Quantcast
Feeds: Email, RSS & Twitter

Get Our Videos By Email

 

8,300 Unique Visitors In The Past Day

 

Powered by Squarespace

 

Most Recent Comments
Cartoons & Photos
SEARCH
« Peter Schiff On Occupy Wall Street: "They Aren't Protesting Capitalism, They Are Protesting A LACK Of Capitalism" | Main | Yes, That's A Banker Hanging From A Phone Line Along I-95 »
Wednesday
Oct262011

Michael Moore's Mistake: "Keep The Fed, End Capitalism"

Moore is cluelessly deranged regarding bailouts, the Federal Reserve and capitalism.  The problem is not unfettered capitalism; the problem is that favored industries were spared from the market by government assistance.

Capitalism does NOT exist on Wall Street.

Every single over-leveraged, fraudulent financial institution that was saved by TARP and Bernanke and Geithner's trillions in stealth bailouts should have been allowed to fail.  We are talking about investment banks, after all, not your grandmother's church choir.  

Investment banks take risks by nature.  And they should face dissolution and bankruptcy when those bets don't work out.

We've said it from the beginning, against the ignorant and misinformed current of status-quo talking heads and wannabe financial experts, including Inside Job director Charles Ferguson and over-hyped author Ellen Brown, allowing Lehman Brothers to fail was the only thing Bernanke and Paulson ever got right.

The market spoke and the government didn't intervene.  That is capitalism.  And not coincidentally we learned later that Lehman was an over-leveraged cesspool of fraud and criminal malfeasance with a $600 billion crater in its balance sheet, despite assurances from Dick Fuld that $20 billion from taxpayers would have saved the company.  Complete and utter nonsense.  And there is little reason to believe that Lehman's fraudulent financials were any different than what we would have found at Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup or Bank of America.  

Each and every major investment bank was then, and to this day, remains MASSIVELY insolvent.  It's not even a close call - with 30:1 leverage on inadequate capital, assets need only decline 4% in value to wipe out the balance sheet, and assets have declined 30-40% on average.  We are talking about insolvency by orders of magnitude.

Only in the Bernanke-Geithner, CNBC-promoted, 'can-kicking' world of purple unicorns and psychedelic money printing, can any other conclusion be reached.

 

---

In just 15 seconds this clip perfectly encapsulates the madness of bailing out Wall Street millionaires and billionaires.

 

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (31)

@ DB

The above is brilliant! We need a summary reminder of the critical, and really only point from time to time amongst all the noise...
Oct 4, 2011 at 12:49 PM | Unregistered CommenterJosie
Thanks Josie...I took a few minutes and spit out some anger.
Oct 4, 2011 at 1:08 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Occupy Wall Street Protests Full Of Useful Idiot Communists And Socialists

http://www.blacklistednews.com/Occupy_Wall_Street_Protests_Full_Of_Useful_Idiot_Communists_And_Socialists/15972/0/38/38/Y/M.html

This is harsh in parts but very correct in other parts. It's a fine line. We applaud the protests for pointing out the absurdity of the bailouts, and the protesters are a diverse bunch, some of whom have politics that are wrong in my view.

But again, the fact that we have protests is a GOOD thing and we can find common ground on some very important issues.
Oct 4, 2011 at 1:20 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Moore is a brainless trouble maker! He is a socialist. I would not listen to any of his rantings.
Oct 4, 2011 at 1:23 PM | Unregistered CommenterDen
Let's let come out of the protests what will. That's a free market. Chips fall where they do, tearlessly.

Moore makes terrific films but is DEAD wrong about capitalism. The pussies running the fascist show now know full well they don't stand a chance on a field of real competition.
Oct 4, 2011 at 1:40 PM | Unregistered CommenterCheyenne
Moore is a charlatan, or worse- beginning to wonder... I worked on TV Nation and this man who exploited rage against how the corporations swindle the workers to destroy unions- DIDNT WANT TO PAY HIS WRITERS UNION SCALE WAGES. There was a long disagreement between Moore and the writers guild writers over that, and why many who work with him cant stand the guy. Now he just hires interns for volunteer or slave $$, not fair wages at all. Typical limo liberal who forgets where he came from, while using what he got where he came from to make money. His agent is Rahm Emanuel's brother so of this shouldnt be a surpirse.
Oct 4, 2011 at 5:03 PM | Unregistered Commenterclauz
Jct: Schiff calling MIchael Moore a hypocrite for being successful is a cheap shot. Of course, he's wrong for not realizing that the flaw with capitalism is the monopolizing tendency of interest by the FED to pool resources in the hands of the survivors of the mort-gage death-gamble contract of musical chairs with not enough money (Principal borrowed) to match the debt (Principal+Interest).
Oct 4, 2011 at 6:27 PM | Unregistered CommenterKingofthePaupers
Moore's manager is Rahm Emmanuel's brother. No more needs be said about Michael Moore's integrity.
Oct 4, 2011 at 6:38 PM | Unregistered CommenterPaul
Maybe you should stop calling people like Moore misinformed/ignorant. This guy makes political documentaries for a living and if someone is trying to convince me that he doesn't know that the Fed is THE main problem, I'm not buying.

He's more likely someone who is trying to misinform than someone who is misinformed.

Moore will gain people's trust by going to Wisconsin and yelling out that the top 1% have more money than the "bottom" 95% and use that trust to look like one of the good guys when the shit hits the fan like right now. Most already knew that so he didn't break any news to most people.

I trust him about as far as I could throw him.

He's a straight up liar. Period.
Oct 4, 2011 at 7:04 PM | Unregistered CommenterTom
Tom--

I respectfully disagree with you. Moore presents facts, on camera. He's not doctoring his films, which are terrically informative. Did you see MM's interview of Rep. Kaptur on the steps of the Capitol? That's fucking dynamite, dude. And there's no WAY to disagree with me on that.

I disagree with Moore's conclusions based on his own base of facts, but that base is powerful because it is raw and it is fact.
Oct 4, 2011 at 8:09 PM | Unregistered CommenterCheyenne
Cheyenne-

I never said he doctored his films and Marcy Kaptur is dynamite on her own without Moore.

We are talking about here and now and IMO this guy is taking the trust he's "earned" and the fanbase he's created and using it to divert attention away from the ultimate problem which is the FED.

He's exactly like a politician in this instance: Take a stand against social injustices in your work and use that "currency" to take a different stance when you need to.

Do you honestly believe he isn't aware of what the FED is all about?

If he isn't, he should refrain from saying "We have bigger issues than the FED to deal with" or "Capitalism is the real problem".

Utter nonsense. The FED is THE issue.

And if the poster above who said that Moore is somehow tied to Rahm Emmanuel interests, that's all the proof one needs to know what side he's on.

A couple more examples: Democracy Now's Amy Goodman. Supposedly an Alt news outlet to get the message out yet she's a gatekeeper for the 9/11 myth.

Or George Noory who, on his radio show Coast to Coast AM keeps spewing the "Iran wants to wipe Israel off the map" nonsense when Juan Cole translated that speech and it actually says: "The Zionist regime occupying Israel shall be removed from the page of time" ( loosely quoted). That's the government of Israel he's talking about, not the people or the country and they are actually the words of one of the Imams.

But I digress.

The guy's not trustworthy when he spews this nonsense.

It isn't any different than how the Tea Party has been co-opted by Israel-firsters like Palin.

Same exact thing, actually.
Oct 4, 2011 at 10:34 PM | Unregistered CommenterTom
One thing M Morre is not, is Stupid...........Just as the last thing a Crazy Person aint, is Crazy...................They know what their doing, trust me. We came close to losing our life's from "JR's" girlfriend.

She is now locked behind bars, but Carol was out to take me down, and our son was going to do the Dirty Work..............Trust me, crazy people know what they are doing...........MM & GS, is on site........................
Oct 4, 2011 at 11:04 PM | Unregistered CommenterTexas Dar
I watched F911 when it first came out, MM interspersed a lot of truth in the movie and lead everyone exactly in the wrong direction as to who was responsible for it. It took me some time to figure out a more realistic scenario as to who was behind the attacks, but all you have to do is watch MM refuse to acknowledge the "fed needs to end" and it should be plain as to what side he is actually on. A little hint it sure is not with the 99%.
Oct 4, 2011 at 11:30 PM | Unregistered CommenterFred
I shake my head at the ignorance. The brainwashing is so intense that no one here seems to be able to honestly look at the glaring problems with capitalism and have been conditioned to spit out the word socialist as something worse than child molester.Not a socialist? Then I guess you you won't accept your pension, using public roads , getting the fire departments assistance in an emergency etc. Idiots
Oct 4, 2011 at 11:49 PM | Unregistered Commenterpaul
Tom et al.--

Thank you for the thoughtful insights. I guess as a member of the bar and a wannabe jurist, I'm very reluctant to judge folks on their intentions. I'm far more comfortable judging bodies of work. Moore's films are solid, though I frequently find myself shaking my head at his conclusions, e.g., capitalism is bad.

On that note, if it is true that Moore says ignore the Fed and focus on capitalism, then he is not only wrong but a fop: the Fed is an identifiable institution that carries out measurable acts, whereas capitalism is a construct, an idea.

It is a good thing that we still have spaces like this for real debate, as opposed to the meaningless sideshows that are so common seemingly everywhere else.

What the Fed has done is wrong and calls for correction and punishment. It is the corrosion of justice that I find most worrisome. For without that, we are due for a world of hurt, a place that chills my marrow. In that light, the maybe or maybe not nefarious intentions of artists and filmmakers strikes me as quaint luxury.
Oct 5, 2011 at 10:45 AM | Unregistered CommenterCheyenne
Moore has just become the King of Idiotville.
Oct 5, 2011 at 12:43 PM | Unregistered CommenterS. Gompers
.................@...Cheyenne ..........

I have said it way back in 2007, if it wasent for A Gore, and the internet, None of this Crap would be happening today. No wonder the goverment wants to shut it down........

Lickin Them Stamp's, aint nothin compared to hand writting that letter. Thank God for the typewriter, and that little "IBM Ball"...........

I have had 2 puters "Locked Up" becouse of the Freedom of Information Ack, and digging whAre no Smart People, should of went................

God, I love the internet............................................................................................Keep Up the Good Work...
Oct 6, 2011 at 12:08 AM | Unregistered CommenterTexas Dar
T-Dar:

But, but, but... Al Gore says he "took the initiative in creating the Internet."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnFJ8cHAlco (queue to 0:50)

Thus, like a true god, he not only invented (i.e., conceived of the invention known as) the Internet, but reduced it to practice as well. But in his infinite beneficence, he didn't even care about getting any patents on it. He was content to turn the other cheek, not so much as giving a single fuck, as thousands of sham inventors roam the earth taking credit for Big Al's creation.
Oct 7, 2011 at 5:05 PM | Unregistered CommenterCheyenne
A lot of this is semantics and misunderstanding. I doubt Moore has spent much time really researching the Fed, and both he and Schiff agree as far as ending socialism for corporations. That's enough common ground to move forward, and only split once we've ended corporate socialism.
Oct 7, 2011 at 7:34 PM | Unregistered CommenterBenjamin
Looks like all or most of the rantings here come from 'libertarian republicans' blaming the government for republican deregulation.. There wouldn't of been bailouts to begin with because there wouldn't of been a 2008 economic crash if every Republican Senator in a republican majority Congress during the Clinton Admin in 1999 had not voted for the GLB Act rending the Glass Steagall Act powerless to provide the proper oversight and entity separation that would of prohibited banks and other financial companies from merging into giant trusts (conflict of interests) when the 21st century hit once again allowing banks to merge with insurance companies and investment houses.

When the Senate republican majority voted to pass Gramm-Leach-Bliley by a vote of 55 to 44 [all but one Democrat voting against], it reversed what was, for more than six decades, a framework that had governed the functions and reach of the nation's largest banks. No longer limited by laws and regulations commercial and investment banks could now merge. Many had already begun the process, including, among others, J.P. Morgan and Citicorp. The new law allowed it to be permanent. The updated ground rules were low on oversight and heavy on risky ventures. Historically in the business of mortgages and credit cards, banks now would sell insurance and stock.

Dem politicians facing a Clinton era republican majority that introduced and passed the GLB bill on behalf of the banking and financial industry buying their support with $300 million from banking industry lobbyists with over 20 years of bribing republican politicians to repeal the Glass Steagall Act. Republicans rammed the Gramm-Leach-Bliley through with a final vote holding a veto proof majority that Bill Clinton could not veto. Republican politicians and the banking industry that had bought them lock, stock and barrel are fully to blame for the Glass Steagall Act rendered powerless by the GLB Act in 1999 allowing the banking industry, along with full republican support, to become the primary future cause of the 2008 economic crash.
Oct 8, 2011 at 12:54 PM | Unregistered CommenterAdnihilo
It boils down to simple exlanations, and decribes whats going on righ now.

Decades of Privatising Corp. profits(AKA: the bailouts)
Deades of Sosializing Corp. dept(AKA: the bailouts)
Its not even close to Capitalism.
Its plain steeling(MBS, CDS, and the Fed, for money out of the air) form our comon welth, the sweat and blod form our hands.

And on topp of that, scams and downright criminal frauds, and stil the MSM take what They say as The Truth in economics.
Decades of deregulations have brouth us here to day, where the Banks have finaly proven their inability to follow rules and laws. A corrupt regulatory regime, unable to respons to criminal frauds, and a failed monetary system that wil eventualy implode(by printing money).
There is simply no value anymore, the banks are empty shells, wourthless and have thru corporat monpoly and wellfare becomed a finnancial abyss wher one can showel money into, forever.
A bottomless pitt.
Some day it must stopp.
Or.
Soner or later, it wil stopp.

Do it now and you may have control, wait and it wil just exlpode.

"Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer cell."
Edward Abbey.
Oct 8, 2011 at 2:17 PM | Unregistered Commentermikael
He was content to turn the other cheek, not so much as giving a single fuck, as thousands of sham inventors roam the earth taking credit for Big Al's creation. ......@ Cheyenne ......

Then AG realy did have a hand in inventing the internet.....? Guess I had it all wrong all these years. Oh Wait, he need'ed the internet so he could trick the people of the world about his Scam about the warmming thing........

Reamber Waaaaaaaay Back in the early 1970's. The Next Ice Age was gona hit by the turn of the centry. We need to clean up the air or were gona freeze to death.

Next we had "Smog Crap" on our cars and the MPG went down 8-10 mpg. That was right when gas went from 33 1/3 a gal. to $69.9 a gal.

Funny thing I reamber that all the talk of the next Ice Age just disapered over night. No more warnnings on how the Glasher was going to be as far south as Kansas City and St. Louis Mo.

The kids came home with Ice Age home work to learn how the planet is getting colder becouse of what man and the caars are doing to it.....

My how a few years ( "40" ) can realy change peoples minds. Guess its safe to sell my Artic-Cat suit for -30* cuz now I need to get my Blue Foil Thong & Boxers from my boat so I dont over heat from AG's fake warmming crap.........

Holly Crap, a Democrat invented the internet all the wile Pissing On His Shoes, becouse he aint smart enough to take 2 steps forward, becouse its shorter than he thinks......
Oct 8, 2011 at 2:30 PM | Unregistered CommenterTexas Dar
"Then AG realy did have a hand in inventing the internet.....?"

No, Dar. Al Gore couldn't invent his way out of paper sack, much less anything like the Internet. I was really pointing out that his actual quote (I took the initiative in creating the Internet) are far more arrogant than what's attributed to him (merely inventing the Internet). He sounds someone with a God complex and a steering committee under him, just ridiculous.
Oct 8, 2011 at 8:11 PM | Unregistered CommenterCheyenne
Fred is right. What Moore doesn't say is as important as what he does. When I watced F9/11 he brought out some really good issues and steered the entire film away from 'who dunnit' don't trust him a'tall. Again he's misleading people. Capitalism isn't the problem, corporatism is (or Fascism as Cheyenne pointed out).
Oct 9, 2011 at 6:36 AM | Unregistered CommenterCanuck
Again he's misleading people. Capitalism isn't the problem, corporatism is (or Fascism as Cheyenne pointed out).

Yes, these kids are only repeatting what the teacher has told them. Im sure the ones that know the truth will get them stright. Its like fingers on the chalk board every time I hear that.........
Oct 9, 2011 at 12:31 PM | Unregistered CommenterTexas Dar
re. Texas Dar in "Again he's misleading people. Capitalism isn't the problem, corporatism is (or Fascism as Cheyenne pointed out)."

Yes, what we have in America is corporatism. And that was the essence of what Michael Moore was railing against in his film "Capitalism, a Love Story"
http://michaelmoore.com/books-films/capitalism-love-story

Watch it, ya'll might learn something that doesn't stem from Ron Paul ;-]
Oct 9, 2011 at 12:41 PM | Unregistered CommenterAdnihilo
I have posted clips from that movie several times. Some parts were outstanding. I don't deny this. But he's dead wrong in the clip with this story. If he means crony capitalism, he needs to say it, but he doesn't.
Oct 10, 2011 at 1:08 AM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Capitalism ALWAYS and INEVITABLY leads to corporatism. The most succesful will form corporations that will grow to mega size , that is unless you want to prevent this with regulation. GET IT?
Oct 11, 2011 at 10:42 PM | Unregistered Commenterpaul
Daily Bail linked to this article: http://www.blacklistednews.com/Occupy_Wall_Street_Protests_Full_Of_Useful_Idiot_Communists_And_Socialists/15972/0/38/38/Y/M.html.

DB said it was harsh, he neglected to mention absurdly inaccurate and extremely disingenuous. It's author should read the Communist Manifesto before commenting upon it. But, alas, he knows who reads his tripe, and knows they won't bother to fact-check him.

He should also review the history of the US income tax, but again, why should he bother,...
Oct 26, 2011 at 3:35 PM | Unregistered Commenterdave
Cut Mr. Moore a break.

Things just come out badly, 1.

He may have mistaken capitalism for bullXXXX.

Mr. Moore obviously seek free, equal, happy. He has my vote.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BJyyyRYbSk


I find myself at DailyBail. I think Mr. Ritholtz is philosophy-neutral.

The backstopping of the trillions of derivatives seems a little bigger
than your covering for $112 million in student debts, which
scapegoat radio obsesses over.

The slight - of - hand passing to you the wrongdoer's fraud
kinda speaks for itself.

http://dailybail.com/home/new-obama-foreclosure-plan-shifts-fraud-liability-from-wall.html

This was risk sold. but sold to suckers. shortable.
That's what makes it different from 1930, when the ultra-wealthy
then also ran out of suckers. Suckers because of one slight-of-hand
policy after another, today daily, shafting all but the scapegoaters and the
arrogant.

People scapegoat for profit knowing from their own experience
how to tyrannize. They may have been foreseen per a roadmap.
I am guessing the entire world shares a sense of right and wrong
BUT FOR this CONVEYED twist, that affording a mathematical proof
that does not have too many avenues, does not entail too much data.

People scapegoat to pacify. They would do us a favor by instead
mstrbtg over a toilet.

Transference is all the above pushed onto you. You then fear for
anyone resembling them. That is why you fight in the streets.


There is no substitute for failure but failure. No one should blame someone
else for their own mistakes. Those intractable issues flowing from that
may be not issues at all because of it.

The only losers here are the obnoxious losers who created the problem.


http://holygenes.weebly.com
Oct 26, 2011 at 3:45 PM | Unregistered CommenterMr. Conveyed
I really enjoyed this post. You describe this topic very well. I really enjoy reading your blog and I will definitely bookmark it! Keep up the interesting posts!
Nov 22, 2011 at 3:02 AM | Unregistered Commenterdenver signature limousine

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.