New Obama Foreclosure Plan Shifts Fraud Liability From Wall Street To Taxpayers
Photo - Obama and Jamie Dimon see eye to eye...
WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration is introducing a new program on Monday designed to lower monthly mortgage payments for more troubled homeowners.
But a key new condition in the plan would shift the financial liability for refinanced loans from Wall Street banks to the American taxpayer. And by focusing on lower payments, the program does not confront what housing experts view as the core problem in the foreclosure crisis -- borrower debt that exceeds the value of one's home.
Faced with the weak response to the Home Affordable Refinance Program, the Obama administration is planning to open up the program to all borrowers who owe more on their mortgage than their homes' worth, commonly dubbed being underwater, and have not missed a mortgage payment. HARP had been limited to borrowers who owed up to 25 percent more than their home is worth. More than 22 percent of all home mortgages -- or 10.9 million homes -- are currently underwater, according to CoreLogic data. Fewer than 900,000 borrowers have elected to go through HARP to date.
The revised program also eliminates several fees associated with refinancing that can make the decision to refinance uneconomical for borrowers. But the potential benefit of the eliminated fees could be relatively small: If a few thousand dollars worth of fees made refinancing a bad deal for underwater borrowers, the ultimate benefits that refinancing can pose would remain limited.
On a conference call with reporters, White House National Economic Council Director Gene Sperling referred to the HARP expansion as "a win-win policy" that will result in "less defaults" and "fewer foreclosures." But one of the program's new terms will benefit private-sector Wall Street banks, potentially at the expense of taxpayers.
The newly expanded program would expunge legal liabilities associated with mortgages refinanced through the program for the original lenders of the mortgages. Each time a bank sent a loan to Fannie and Freddie, it certified that the loan met Fannie and Freddie's safe lending criteria. But many loans sent to the mortgage giants did not, in fact, meet those criteria. Currently, when borrowers default on those ineligible loans, the mortgage giants can "put back" the resulting losses onto the banks that pushed the loans.
Under the modified plan, "put back" liability at banks will be erased for any underwater mortgage that is refinanced through HARP, eliminating Fannie and Freddie's ability to sack lenders with losses in the event that the mortgage does not pan out.
If borrowers go through HARP, but decide after several months that the modest monthly savings do not outweigh owing tens of thousands of dollars more than their home is worth, taxpayer-owned Fannie and Freddie will have to take the full loss. Even if the original loan was sent to Fannie and Freddie with false or fraudulent guarantees from the bank -- promises that may directly be tied to the borrower's current financial problems -- banks will be immune from liability. Fannie and Freddie plan to charge banks "a modest fee" to extinguish this liability, but the administration has yet to determine what that fee will be.
While the revised program seeks to lower mortgage payments for underwater homeowners, the program does nothing to address the core problem -- owing more than the home is worth. Though borrowers may save hundreds of dollars a month in lower payments by refinancing, they routinely owe tens of thousands of dollars more than their homes are worth, even after receiving aid.
"In most cases people would probably be better off walking," said economist Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic Policy and Research.
During a conference call with reporters, Department of Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan acknowledged that negative equity is a problem, and said the administration hopes to address the issue on other fronts. Donovan cited settlement negotiations with big banks over widespread allegations of foreclosure fraud and initiatives under the Home Affordable Modification Program, a separate Obama foreclosure-relief plan administered by banks, as key initiatives.
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman and Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden have both objected to the foreclosure fraud settlement talks on the grounds that they give away too much to banks without investigating the scope of fraud problems in the system. The Home Affordable Modification Program has been a hotbed for the kind of borrower abuses that the administration is pressuring lenders to settle over.
Reader Comments (20)
The longer housing isn't fixed, the bigger its drag on the rest of the economy. If they had let the whole thing collapse, at least renters would have gotten a windfall and more young people could have afforded to buy. Heck, even people underwater could have re-purchased their houses. It wouldn't have been pretty, but one day it would have been over instead of this ongoing impending doom and serial wealth transfers to the alligators.
Namely...
1) When folks participate in these asinine programs the loans change from nonrecourse to recourse. That means that these bastards that jacked up the prices of housing fraudulently with all their securitization schemes in the first place, now instead of just taking the house back as collateral can come after the homeowner forever for anything and everything they have. Bloody brilliant!
2) The other dirty little piece of this - if a homeowner goes for this refi/mod, specific language is placed in the new docs that the homeowner cant or wont sue the banks/servicers. There is a BIG reason for this that most of us who have been following this whole housing debacle are aware of- the banks cant produce the notes as they were separated from the security instrument during the securitization process violating hundreds of years of contract law!
So uh huh getting new paperwork with this clause inserted therefore eliminates the biggest problem these douchebags have-- given they cant remarry the two essential documents--- and therefore even prove they have the right to foreclose or even collect payments given the broken chain of title-- so folks are unwittingly giving them a pass (letting them paper over the original fraud) if they sign up for a program like this ....
Welcome to lawlessness, pure and simple.
http://630wpro.com/sectional.asp?id=18073
Tired of the banks that run America?
November 5th its time to Run the "Too Big" Banks
I read obviously involved people commenting on particulars of the world of finance, but nobody raising their eyes to see the main beneficiary to this looting. The barbarians are within the walls.
Not a chance!!!!
First their pension retirment age is 55, and compared with My ret.age that is 65, is due to average working Time during a year.
The Greeks works 2150 hours, while I have 1750 hours.
So it explains its self I hope.
The notion of lazyness is somwhat weird, and comes from a coplet missunderstandings of sosialsystem practising.
The major difference in some European counrtys, basicly Nothern is that Health and Scools are free. Thats payed for thru Tax, a Tax that is, contradictoring whats the average American viue, same as in USA.
And our goverment usess Less than USA pr. inhabitant than the USA do, and still its free.
huh
Thats not fu.. comunism, its what we expect to gett back from the fu.. Tax money.
You are the one been Fooled.
But in every other aspect, the monopolyism and goverment incompetance, crappy preformances and utter stupidity, we have the same problem, a elite that do what It wants and their sponsores want, and dont even care what the People want and belives(AGW etc). Even wars that we dont aprove, they are involved.
Democracy anyone.
Its a western hemipher problem, the old rule of robberbarons are fading.
The only problem is that they wont give up without a fight, the only consern I have.
Just follow the Money, it always, always ends up some where.
and - Delaware AG Biden talking about his lawsuit against MERS: "NY and MA Attorney Generals are also working on the central issue of the mortgage securitization/foreclosure crisis which is: MERS and robosigning. The issue is criminality - blessing the conduct and making it very difficult to prosecute that conduct; deceiving the homeowners about who owns their mortgage..."
http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/318385-treasurys-latest-housing-plan-demolishing-houses
[snip]
A federal housing program originally designed to help keep people in their homes is increasingly being used for a dramatically different purpose — the demolition of vacant homes that keep property values from rising.
But the move has been criticized by some who say the Obama administration should not be spending money to destroy buildings that could be used as homeless shelters.
The Treasury Department this week agreed to let Ohio use $60 million in federal money to demolish abandoned properties. That followed a June decision to allow Michigan to spend $100 million in federal funds on demolition efforts.
The funding comes from Treasury's Hardest Hit Fund (HHF), a initiative born of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) that gave 18 states and the District of Columbia a total of $7.6 billion in housing aid. Until this summer, the money was used by states to help homeowners stay current on their mortgage payments or make insurance or property tax payments.