Quantcast
Feeds: Email, RSS & Twitter

Get Our Videos By Email

Powered by Squarespace

 

 

Search The Daily Bail Archive Of 15,000 Videos

SEARCH THE DAILY BAIL

SPONSORED BY  

 

Hank Paulson Is A Criminal - Pass It On

Bernanke's Failures Caught On Tape

"The Federal Reserve Is A Ponzi Scheme"


Get Our Videos By Email

THE FED UNDER FIRE: Must See Clip

Bernanke's Replacement: Happy Hour In Santa Cruz

Must See: National Debt Road Trip

"Of Course We're Not Going To  Payback the Chinese."

Dave Chappelle On White Collar Crime

Carlin: Wall Street Owns Washington

SLIDESHOW - The 11 States Most Likely to Go Bust

SLIDESHOW - 7 Really Big Holes - Don't Miss #7

SLIDESHOW - Molotov Cocktails In Greece

SLIDESHOW - The Sights, Sounds & Women of Texas

SLIDESHOW - Genius Signs From Irish IMF Protest

SLIDESHOW - Egyptian Revolution - Graphic PICS

SLIDESHOW - U.K. Student Riots

SLIDESHOW - Airport Security Cartoons - TSA

Most Recent Comments
Cartoons & Photos
SEARCH
« BOMBSHELL REPORT - European Central Bank Risks Being 'Bankrupted' By Bailouts: "If Assets Fall By Just 4.23%, Its Entire Capital Base Would Be Wiped Out" | Main | Jack Cafferty: GE Paid No Taxes For 2009 & 2010: "Corporations Own The U.S. Government" »
Thursday
Jun092011

"Less than a 3 percent drop in asset values could wipe out Wall Street" - Crisis Panel Says In Final Report

It's all about leverage.  We've been waiting for this public quote for 2 1/2 years. It's very simple math.  And it's also the key to understanding the crisis and why all of the banks are so deeply insolvent.  You've heard it several times here before. Henry Paulson, when he was still CEO of Goldman in 2004, successfully lobbied the SEC to change the rules on capital ratios.  Leverage exploded from a previous limit of 12:1 to beyond 40:1 for all 5 firms, and when you consider that a substantial portion of the assets were synthetics then the real leverage numbers were much higher.

---

Ratigan details Paulson's rarely mentioned role in the crisis...

Watch this from Dylan Ratigan and read the story below from the NY Times on Henry Paulson:

By the way, reinstating the pre-2004 rules of 12:1 would go a long way toward a financial fix and yet it was left undone by Dodd-Frank, which only required that the Federal Reserve undertake a study of capital ratios and report findings to Congress.  That will certainly solve the problem.

Back to the math.  In a world of 40:1, assets don't have much downside.  Consider what this means in a simple example.

  • If your collective assets drop in value from 100 to 97, you're done.  Toast.  Game over.  At least that's how it's supposed to work.

Here's a further illustration.

Goldman Sachs could have $1 trillion in assets anchored by just $25 billion in capital.  Assume Goldman's asset base loses 30% in value as happened in 2008, creating a paper loss of $300 billion, which if they were forced to mark honestly, would leave them insolvent to the tune of approximately $275 billion.  This is what I mean when I've written before that the banks aren't just a little bit insolvent, instead their insolvency depth is a multiple (in this case 6x) of their original capital.  

Adam Levitin testified last month to Congress that an honest accounting of JUST second lien loans - helocs and nothing else - not CMBS, not RMBS - just home equity loans - that this would instantly wipe out the entire capital base for each of the 4 largest banks - Citigroup, JPMorgan, Wells Fargo and Bank of America. Poof, and gone.  And I'll say it 1 more time - that's just for helocs.  

Now remember 'insolvent by multiples' as you consider the $144 billion paid out in bonuses in 2010 by a collective of bailed-out, bankrupt banks.

But none of that matters anymore, not since the FASB rule change.  Now it's a game of super-galactic Texas bullshit as each and every bank survives by the foreskin of their mismarked assets, all with the blessing of Congress, CNBC, accounting regulators, Sheila Bair, Tim Geithner, Obama and the Ber-nank.

Now onto the story from Reuters, who got an advance look at the report from Phil Angelides and the Financial Crisis Commission due to be released later Thursday.

 

----

Source - Reuters

Financial Meltdown Was 'Avoidable,' Crisis Panel Finds

The financial crisis could have been avoided and was the result of poor decision making both in Washington and at top financial firms that fostered a culture of excessive risk taking, according to a draft report written by Democrats on a panel that investigated the meltdown and obtained by Reuters.

The Democratic majority of the 10-member Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission spreads the blame widely to regulators, politicians, financial firms and credit rating agencies.

The report will be officially released on Thursday but it has been endorsed only by the congressionally appointed panel's six Democratic commissioners. Three Republican members will release a separate minority report and a fourth Republican plans to unveil a report of his own that will focus on government housing policies.

Among regulators the report singles out former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan and his successor Ben Bernanke. The report faults Greenspan and his allies for pushing the idea that financial institutions could "police themselves."

Bernanke and former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson were criticized for not seeing the problems in the subprime mortgage markets earlier.

Clinton administration officials were rebuked for pushing to shield over-the-counter derivatives from regulation.

As for the corporate chieftains at the large financial firms that were either toppled or brought to their knees by the crisis, the panel says its examination found "stunning instances of governance breakdowns and irresponsibility."

Among those singled out are American International Group, mortgage giant Fannie Mae and Merrill Lynch.

The report faults investment banks Bear Stearns, Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley for "operating with extraordinarily thin capital" in 2007.

  • "Less than a 3 percent drop in asset values could wipe out a firm," according to the report.

The report criticized credit rating agencies such as Moody's Corp, McGraw-Hill Cos' Standard & Poor's and Fimalac SA's Fitch Ratings for giving "their seal of approval" to securities that proved to be far more risky than advertised because they were backed by mortgages provided to borrowers who were unable to make payments on their loans.

The report also discussed the role played by "shadow banking," or unregulated financial firms, the securitization of private mortgage debt and over the counter derivatives.

Continue reading...

---

 

 

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (4)

Time to say FUCK THE IRS? If there's no room in America's jails for multi-billion dollar sociopathic criminal extortionists I'm sure we can fit 275 million middle class tax evaders in there. Then we can all finally be employed at 100% capacity and instead of stealing a percentage of free market income, we can all team up and Simonize the Rothschilds Rolls Royce collection.

I guess we all need to accept a little slavery to preserve the illusion that we're free, but if we all said FUCK YOU to the IRS ... just how many debt slaves does it take to pedicure the first ladies of Wall Street royalty? And if you have to house us, and feed us, while our homes continue to devalue and the mortgage interest doesn't get paid, where's the profit in that?

I think the intellectual elite and world bankers may need look twice before they squat and pinch one off, as their soup tureens appear to be edging ever closer to their own chamber pots. I know you think it doesn't stink down there, but are you really willing to eat it?
Jan 27, 2011 at 12:50 PM | Unregistered CommenterWil Martindale
Wil,

Let's just say you have a way with words.

Of course, there aren't 275 million taxpayers, are there? Maybe 150 million. Roughly half the country are what Calhoun would call "tax eaters." Then at the top we've got the cheaters. We're still outnumbered, but I've been fantasizing about a tax revolt since about Jan./Feb. 2009.

I wonder, though, if it wouldn't be cathartic (and fun) to actually write the IRS to literally say "FUCK YOU". As in, "Yes, mof-ers, I'm going to pay my taxes, but only because I don't want to go to jail. And I resent the hell out of having to write this check to support the likes of Lloyd Blankfein, but I especially resent having to support the salary of fuckers like Tim Geithner. So FUCK YOU."

For example.
Jan 27, 2011 at 1:12 PM | Registered CommenterDr. Pitchfork
Actually Pitchfork, I have this technology called an "HP Laserjet 4000" and I'm planning on printing my tax payment with that over the weekend ...

Paa ha-ha-ha-haaaa....
Jan 27, 2011 at 3:31 PM | Unregistered CommenterWil Martindale
Crash JP Morgan - Buy Silver
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wN0rcNJXFfI
Jan 27, 2011 at 7:33 PM | Unregistered CommenterAnonymous

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.