WATCH LIVE: Historic Senate Filibuster Over Obama's Assassination Policy
Rand Paul's epic filibuster over civil liberties, Obama's kill list, drone strikes.
'I will speak until I can no longer speak. Are you going to drop a hellfire missile on Jane Fonda? Are you going to drop a missile on Kent State?'
Sen. Rand Paul launches into an old-school filibuster in an attempt to block the nomination of John Brennan for CIA director over concerns related to Obama's drone policy and his authority to assassinate Americans on U.S. soil. Paul was joined by Senators Marco Rubio, Ron Wyden (the lone Democrat), Ted Cruz, Mike Lee and Pat Toomey.
UPDATE - Paul ends Senate filibuster after nearly 13 hours...
---
More Highlights
'Like a modern Mr. Smith goes to Washington.'
Sen. Ted Cruz to Rand Paul during today's filibuster: "My only regret is that there are not 99 of your colleagues here today standing with you in defense of the most fundamental principle in our Declaration of Independence and our Constitution."
---
Cruz reads Victory or Death letter from the Alamo.
During today's 'Obama assassination policy' filibuster.
---
EARLIER TODAY:
Holder Tells Senate It's Legal For Drones To Kill U.S. Citizens On U.S. Soil
---
Filibuster Summary
"I will speak until I can no longer speak," Paul said. "I cannot sit quietly and let [the President] shred the Constitution."
Paul began speaking just before noon, becoming the first Senator to use the "talking filibuster" in more than two years. He was joined several of his Senate colleagues around the three-hour mark, and the group had grown to eight by the sixth hour of the filibuster.
Paul's marathon remarks have focused on violations of civil liberties under the Obama administration, and particularly on a letter sent by Attorney General Eric Holder this week, which claimed that the President has the legal authority to use military force against American citizens on U.S. soil.
“When I asked the president, can you kill an American on American soil, it should have been an easy answer. It’s an easy question. It should have been a resounding an unequivocal, ‘No," Paul said Wednesday. "The president’s response? He hasn’t killed anyone yet. We’re supposed to be comforted by that."
Later, Paul warned about the ambiguity over who could be targeted by drones, suggesting that they could have been used during 1960s campus protests.
"Are you going to just drop a hellfire missile on Jane Fonda?" Paul asked. "Are you going to drop a missile on Kent State?"
After more than three hours at podium, Paul was relieved by Utah Republican Mike Lee and Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz.
"You're standing here like a modern-day 'Mr. Smith Goes To Washington,'" Cruz told Paul admiringly. "You must surely be making Jimmy Stewart smile."
The trio was joined soon after by Kansas Republican Sen. Jerry Moran, chairman of the NRSC, and Oregon Democrat Ron Wyden, a vocal opponent of Obama's drone program.
Florida Senator Marco Rubio, another GOP darling, joined the filibuster briefly around the five-hour mark. Taking the floor, Rubio joked to Paul: "Let me give you some advice — keep some water nearby."
After six hours, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid interrupted the filibuster to try to get a cloture vote on Brennan's confirmation. "I think the rest of the body needs to know if we're going to finish tonight, or tomorrow, or the next day," Reid told Paul.
But the Kentucky Republican dug in, telling Reid he would only end the filibuster if Obama or Holder clarify their position on killing Americans in the U.S. "I'm not in the position to talk to the Attorney General," Reid replied, visibly irritated. "Everyone should plan on coming tomorrow. We're through for the night."
The matter thus resolved, Paul turned back to his filibuster, welcoming Pennsylvania Republican Pat Toomey to the floor.
While other Senators can take the podium to ask questions, Paul is not allowed to leave the floor during the filibuster.
---
Holder says Obama plans to explain drone policy - Wash Po
Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. told a Senate committee Wednesday that he expects President Obama to explain the legal rationale underpinning the use of armed drones to target and kill U.S. citizens overseas. Obama said in his State of the Union speech last month that he would be more transparent about the targeted killing program, and Holder said the administration is struggling with the need to fulfill that pledge.
Rand Paul's Letter To John Brennan About Drone Killings In The U.S.
Eric Holder's Letter To Rand Paul In Response
EARLIER TODAY:
Holder Tells Senate It's Legal For Drones To Kill U.S. Citizens On U.S. Soil
Let's just say Paul's efforts aren't going unnoticed.
Related links:
FAA Releases New Drone List - Is Your Town On The Map?
Original NYT Kill List Article That Sparked The Outrage
Obama Killed A 16-Year-Old American And Didn't Say Anything About It
Kill List Memo Exposes Democrats As Unprincipled Hacks (Glenn Greenwald)
WHOM CAN THE PRESIDENT KILL? - New Yorker
The man whom the administration has put up to head the CIA would not say whether or not the president of the United States has the power to order the extrajudicial killing of a United States citizen within the borders of the United States. And the hearing, remarkably, went on as though nothing untoward had happened.
Obama's Rules For Assassinating U.S. Citizens
Why Charlottesville Is The First City To Outlaw Drones
Reader Comments (17)
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2013/03/06/rand_paul_is_waging_an_epic_mr_smith_style_filibuster_right_now.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/05/us-drone-strike_n_2813857.html
Over 23,000 comments from readers...
http://dailybail.com/home/why-charlottesville-is-the-first-us-city-to-outlaw-drones.html
http://bangordailynews.com/2013/02/28/opinion/editorials/take-it-slow-on-maine-drone-law/
Drones are coming, and Maine needs to be ready. That’s the premise of LD 236, “An Act to Protect the Privacy of Citizens from Domestic Unmanned Vehicle Use,” a bill sponsored by Sen. John Patrick, D-Rumford. The one-year moratorium would protect Mainers’ privacy rights from the rush of surveillance technology, while allowing adequate time to explore fully the legal implications of public and private drone surveillance.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/barackobama/9913615/Barack-Obama-has-authority-to-use-drone-strikes-to-kill-Americans-on-US-soil.html
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-rand-paul-brennan-nomination-20130306,0,257591.story
http://washingtonexaminer.com/rand-paul-filibustering-over-drones-i-will-not-let-obama-shred-the-constitution/article/2523425
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/lists/longest_filibusters/
Meanwhile in Southwest Ohio, the Cincinnati Police Chief is seeking to toughen Ohio gun laws...
Ohio already has tougher laws than Indiana and Kentucky, and coincidently we also have a former Lehman Brothers Governor with two NRA F's on his resume.
http://twitter.com/ggreenwald
It is beyond astonishing that Greenwald's immunity to the mental infection of the red-blue puppet show is so rare. The implications are actually terrifying.
What shocks me is the 2 biggest GOP traitors in history....Graham and McCain opposed this fillibuster
How could anyone with a brain vote for those 2 scumbags?
http://xrepublic.tv/node/2460
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/03/08/mccain-calls-paul-cruz-amash-wacko-birds/
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/03/07/historic-filibuster-renews-bipartisan-focus-on-drones-regulation/#ixzz2MyOXHVor
http://thehill.com/video/senate/286881-paul-blasts-back-at-mccain-graham#ixzz2MyOg1qi7
http://www.infowars.com/what-holder-really-said/
Great find. I had the same thought when I read Holder's one-sentence letter. 'Engaging in combat' can be defined in very broad terms.
SNIP:
Holder selected a carefully qualified question in order to justify a narrowly tailored answer that reserves an expansive claim of executive power to authorize summary executions by the president. That’s how totalitarians operate.