John Cusack: 'Obama Is A Regressive Corporate Warlord'
John Cusack battles a legion of braindead Obama drones and shows support for Rand Paul's filibuster.
---
dems ? Do U have any thoughts on Obama's transition from a progressive academic humanist 2 a regressive corporate warlord?
— John Cusack (@johncusack) March 6, 2013
Cusack has been a consistent critic of unmanned drones no matter who occupies the Oval Office, and while thousands are tweeting today that they #StandWithRand as the senator demands answers on the Obama administration’s drone policy, Cusack is wondering where progressive Democrats are standing.
For gods sake where are democrats ?? “@democracynow: Rand Paul: Obama Admin Response Drones "More Than Frightening" owl.li/itdHI”
— John Cusack (@johncusack) March 6, 2013
Good question“@cenkuygur: Up to 8 Senators now joining the Rand Paul #filibuster. Where are the so-called progressive Democratic senators?”
— John Cusack (@johncusack) March 6, 2013
@johncusack My gut was that u would b more liberal, I don't know why; but I sense a real disdain for this admin?
— Christa Perone (@MyPerone) March 6, 2013
i AM more liberal -- thats why i bring this up...whats in a name i suppose - branded liberal? by msnbc or the real thing?@myperone
— John Cusack (@johncusack) March 6, 2013
@johncusack Is it poss. to be disappointed/disgusted at drone program & cont. eroding rights without calling Pres a regressive corp warlord?
— Lisellecae (@Lisellecae) March 6, 2013
when ukill innocent people without trial - i mprison them with no trial what would u call it?-used bush powers & exanded them@lisellecae
— John Cusack (@johncusack) March 6, 2013
---
Bonus clip:
Ouch. Hypocritical DEM assassins run for the exits.
Gawker asks the DNC: "Can Americans trust Mitt Romney to make the right call on which U.S. citizens to assassinate?"
John Cusack: 'Obama Is Just Another Ivy League Asshole'
Mar 22, 2013 at 1:20 AM
Reader Comments (11)
Regards,
RJ O'Guillory
Author-
Webster Groves-The Life of an Insane Family
http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/did-the-planners-of-rand-pauls-filibuster-forget-to-tell-him-about-stadium-pal/37127/
Neo-Cons...Zionists...TERRORISTS of the "Jewish" persuasion need to be DNA tested...& Quarantined...NOW !!
http://www.palestine-encyclopedia.com/EPP/TOC.htm
seriously...how long have the Zionist Terrorists been torturing and murdering Women & Girls ....
IN PALESTINE...?
talk about straining a GNAT and swallowing a CAMEL....
By Robert Reich, former head of the Labor Dept. under Bill Clinton.
http://www.businessinsider.com/none-dare-call-it-treason-2013-2?pundits_only=0&get_all_comments=1&no_reply_filter=1#comment-51310d096bb3f7c210000006
[snip]
Imagine a plot to undermine the government of the United States, to destroy much of its capacity to do the public’s business, and to sow distrust among the population.
Imagine further that the plotters infiltrate Congress and state governments, reshape their districts to give them disproportionate influence in Washington, and use the media to spread big lies about the government.
Finally, imagine they not only paralyze the government but are on the verge of dismantling pieces of it.
Far-fetched? Perhaps. But take a look at what’s been happening in Washington and many state capitals since Tea Party fanatics gained effective control of the Republican Party, and you’d be forgiven if you see parallels...
...I suggest the President forget about a “grand bargain.” In fact, he should stop talking about the budget deficit and start talking about jobs and wages, and widening inequality – as he did in the campaign. And he should give up all hope of making a deal with the Tea Partiers who now run the Republican Party.
Instead, the President should let the public see the Tea Partiers for who they are — a small, radical minority intent on dismantling the government of the United States. As long as they are allowed to dictate the terms of public debate they will continue to hold the rest of us hostage to their extremism.
Look at the comments in the article he cites; there is an inordinate amount of asinine, dumbed-down comments from a liberal stooge who has "john" in the screen-name there as well.
Look over the comments and figure it out for yourself. No can do? (See how I used the question mark there?)
There are some cues and keywords that may eventually sink into that soupy grayish muck that passes for your brain: Robert Reich; laughably absurd leftist twat; Obama-cultist posting a link in these here comments, to an article from this useful idiot twat, an article that's not remotely applicable to the topic of Cusack's cut-to-the-chase query about your Dear Leader.
Even for a dimbulb such as yourself, it should be remotely feasible for you to piece together the gist.