Who's Afraid Of Elizabeth Warren, And Why? Examining Her Opposition (Ultimate Viewers Guide)
Video - Obama introduces Warren as interim Chairman
Warren told to quit now because "The banks always win. Always."
Eight short clips below including Geithner, Obama, Gibbs, Norquist, Merkley, Dodd and Pete Peterson.
Here's something I just found:
---
Now Geithner, which we've covered previously here:
Yet surprisingly, in this clip (1 minute), Warren praises Geithner.
---
In my last post, I discussed Chris Dodd's opposition:
---
Grover Norquist and the rest of the Wall Street captured don't like her because she called for the nationalization of the banks. He claims this view represents the 'extreme Left' of American politics.
Perhaps he forgot that Alan Greenspan also called for nationalization, and others from the so-called Right. It's clear that opposition to Warren's candidacy is being pushed and funded by Wall Street, credit-card companies and banks. Those you see speak out -- Dodd, Norquist, Fiscal Times, Geithner, et al -- are merely their paid Washington shills.
Also, Republicans Bill Seidman, Federal Reserve President Thomas Hoenig and Nassim Taleb all voiced their support for bank nationalization. Read one of my first columns on this subject, which was picked up by the NY Times:
---
Now it's Pete Peterson's turn, via his website Fiscal Times:
---
Now Obama...
Video: Obama talks about his former Law School Professor Elizabeth Warren and her possible appointment to lead the CFPB.
---
Video: On the other side, take a look at Oregon Sen. Jeff Merkley as he speaks in support of Dr. Warren.
---
Finally, watch this awesome clip of Warren vs. Geithner and decide for yourself whether you want her in Washington fighting the banking oligarchy.
Video: Warren makes Geithner very uncomfortable with questions about AIG and Goldman Sachs:
- "Where did the money go?"
Reader Comments (58)
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/08/prweb4409724.htm
http://www.businessinsider.com/greenspan-2009-2
http://dailybail.com/home/2009/2/23/the-bank-bailout-verdict-we-are-a-nation-led-by-idiots.html
Battling stomach pains and fatigue, JoAnn Chiakulas would take the train into the city each morning knowing that her resolve was disappointing some people and infuriating others.
But the 67-year-old grandmother said she also knew that as a juror in Rod Blagojevich's corruption trial, she had a responsibility to follow her conscience and the law. She said she did not believe he or his brother committed a crime with their actions to fill Barack Obama's Senate seat, so she would not find them guilty despite what other jurors, prosecutors and, perhaps, the general public wanted.
If it was going to be 11-1, so be it.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-blagojevich-jury-20100827,0,1393639.story?page=1
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/money/real-estate/desperate-homeowners-line-up-for-mortgage-modification-marathon-882338.html
http://www.executivegov.com/2010/08/mullen-national-debt-is-a-security-threat/
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iadyD5XKmEBG9rKT1EOkoaeIUPwwD9HRMPH01
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/08/26/does-obamas-aide-valerie-jarrett-give-elizabeth-warren-the-inside-track/
Something I just found...
And I agree with John P.
My hope is that the left and right can each purge itself of its own brand of insanity and come together.
Not likely but possible.
Elizabeth Warren would be an extraordinary first step.
You can let a very large corporation go bankrupt, such as GM, but if you let a large finance insurance company go bankrupt then the financial repercussions could shake down the entire system. That is what they tried to prevent. The only other option they had was to nationalize and Geithner seemed to hint that they simply didn't have the tools to "restructure" such a large financial institution (i.e. nationalize it.)
But he hinted that they might have the tools in the future, mostly by tone of voice and choice of words.
You have to do a lot of reading between the lines to know what either one of them believes possible and/or desirable or necessary in the future.
As most people on this site know, nationalization doesn't work as well as socialists wish it did, as recent European history proves.
It was criminality, venality, arrogance, greed and sheer stupidity that almost brought the system down and might yet bring it down.
It might be that there is no solution short of collapse and slow recovery for that, if possible.
I can't imagine Sailer, with his explosive, anarchic personality, attracted to a regulator like Elizabeth Warren, that's all.
James Street, what the heck are you talking about? We nationalize banks every goddam Friday. Of course we can, and could, do it. Chris Whalen has explained this ad nauseum. And remember, Lehman's failure did not bring down "the entire system." In fact, it had very little impact on the real economy at all. That's the dirty little secret. Bailouts had virtually NOTHING to do with the real economy. And no, scare tactics do not an argument make.
I have NO IDEA what you are talking about...i had never even heard of Steve Sailer or whatever his name is...you are confused....you were talking to Z...and Z said that he liked steve sailer...why in god's name would you think that was me...go back and read the thread again...
All I said to you was that I didn't know that Z had a website...then you posted the steve sailer links and then Z said that he liked the guy...again...how did you get so confused as to think I was saying that..
Now onto your other comment...
You really are new to this subject matter...what EW was arguing with Geithner about was payment at PAR to AIG counterparties...i've written piece after piece on this subject...without letting AIG fail we could have negotiated payments...in fact AIG was attempting to negotiate payments...then the FRBNY stepped in and Dan Jester, a former Goldmanite working for Geithner and Paulson, got the ball rolling for payouts at PAR...the entire thing was an orchestrated attempt to funnel cash to goldman...
You are mistaken to think that what we did with AIG-Goldman was right and fair...start reading these links...and these are just a few of the stories...
How The NY Fed, Under Stephen Friedman & Tim Geithner Pressured AIG Officials To Withhold Details Of Payments To Goldman Sachs, Other Counterparties
http://dailybail.com/home/how-the-ny-fed-under-stephen-friedman-tim-geithner-pressured.html
___
COVER-UP: New York Fed Officials Pressured the SEC to Grant 'National Security' Status To Hide AIG's $62 Billion Gift To Banks »
http://dailybail.com/home/cover-up-new-york-fed-officials-pressured-the-sec-to-grant-n.html
http://dailybail.com/home/watch-live-video-the-new-york-fed-aig-cover-up-hearings-geit.html
---
Is Stephen Friedman Guilty Of Insider Trading? »
http://dailybail.com/home/is-stephen-friedman-guilty-of-insider-trading.html
Janet Tavakoli Wonders: Did Friedman, Paulson & Geithner Conspire To Hide Goldman's Role In The AIG Crisis? »
http://dailybail.com/home/janet-tavakoli-wonders-did-friedman-paulson-geithner-conspir.html
---
A 25 Billion Dollar Secret: The NY Fed, Goldman & The AIG Cover-Up »
http://dailybail.com/home/a-25-billion-dollar-secret-the-ny-fed-goldman-the-aig-cover.html
---
Who Is Dan Jester And Why Did Tim Geithner Call Him 103 Times During The Financial Meltdown Of 2008?
http://dailybail.com/home/who-is-dan-jester-and-why-did-tim-geithner-call-him-103-time.html
---
How Paulson Appointees & Former GS Employees Dan Jester & Ed Liddy Colluded To Destroy AIG And Secure A Secret Bailout For Goldman Sachs »
http://dailybail.com/home/how-paulson-appointees-former-gs-employees-dan-jester-ed-lid.html
http://dailybail.com/home/subpoenaed-documents-show-goldman-sachs-offered-to-tear-up-a.html
---
This is the last one...but i've written dozens more...at a minimum, please take the time to skim/read all the links...they are quick...you will have a much better understanding of the AIG bailout and why EW went after Geihtner's ass...he was acting on behalf of Goldman not taxpayers...
Mark was talking about Blago.
Who the fuck knows what James keeps going on and on about. He keeps mixing up what you say and what I say.
Pitch was calling Geithner names (maggot shit I think).
Gomp was egging on James and going on and on about the herd.
You posted other stories.
What the fuck did I miss? Oh please, wtf???
as for obama being a fraud...fine i agree basically...next issue...the elections are in november.,..throw out all incumbents except ron paul...
Obama is "The Illegitimate President", I can only see it as the biggest story of my lifetime.
I understand what you are saying DB, I will try.
The BC issue is something different...yes it would be a big story if it were proven he was not born here...i agree...so can we now go back to discussing EW and Geithner and AIG...
As I said, power listens to power, not reason and evidence stated by non-entities, no matter how well packaged and presented. I'm not even a professional economist, not to mention a well-respected or tenured professor in a respected university, or any university or think tank for that matter.
Even economists and professors of finance, from the most respected American universities and think tanks, are almost completely ignored by politicians who only listen to their big money corporate contributors and their pollsters.
It would be the path to lunacy to try to convince any politician of anything since none of them is listening.
My essays are well-reasoned, fact-based observations about the real world. I don't expect to make money from them or to gain recognition. They help me organize my own thoughts and those of other interested people whose sole purpose is to try to gain a little insight into the truth of economics, history, philosophy, science and other human matters.
Also, while I enjoy trying to bring some light and sanity to places such as this, I've lost any illusions that I am talking to more than one person.
I don't accuse DB of being a paranoid schizophrenic ventriloquist. Far from it. But he doesn't even identify himself anywhere on his site and no other contributor, to my knowledge does here either.
So why should I take a bunch of insulting, uncouth and uneducated nonentities hiding behind anonymity, seriously? Or should I be more generous and call you clowns?
Anyone who anonymously vents a huge amount of rage against public figures or known personalities is a coward and potential enemy of the state who is either a craven FBI cover agent and agent provocateur or a potentially dangerous nutcase.
As for a few conveniently ignored facts.
America is very clearly an oligarchy run by a well-established class of businessmen who attend well-known private boarding schools and business schools and who have deep roots in the inherited American plutocracy of the past. They pride themselves on allowing ambitious and intelligent members of the lower orders, such as Hank Paulson, into their ranks.
But without the manure from the lower orders the oligarchy would collapse over night, so there isn't much to be proud about there.
They don't want this system to end and the only way it can end is the way it has ended in every other state on earth. As far as I know there is no exception in history where oligarchies and feudal societies have broken up peacefully and distributed their privileges and power democratically to the majority.
It just doesn't happen.
This time, they sacrificed a few well-chosen sacrificial lambs and saved their friends.
If you knew anything about history and human nature, you wouldn't be outraged. You would be content to watch history repeat itself and sit on the sidelines knowing that you are not players and can't have any influence on the process but only be happy that you have the privilege to understand and observe it.
It's called sanity and good sense.
That being said, you are free to exit stage left and not return...your lack of interest in learning about AIG/Geithner tells me all I need to know.
It's called sanity and good sense.
---
Lastly, James wtf is this..?...I'm a reporter...I cover debt, deficits, bailouts, wall street fraud and corruption...this is probably the wrong site to visit if you wish to sit idly by while you get raped by power...
I would suggest visiting AmericanIdol.com and TMZ in the future so you may be entertained while you do your esteemed observation...
I said:
I don't accuse DB of being a paranoid schizophrenic ventriloquist. Far from it. But he doesn't even identify himself anywhere on his site and no other contributor, to my knowledge does here either.
Why did you take offense?
I stand by my pretty common place observation that power listens to power and its corollary, if you want to have any effect in politics, you have to be a player and be part of a political organization. If that pisses you off so be it.
And what kind of bullshit is this:
Lastly...there is an 'about the author' page above...i've given out plenty of information about myself, in comments and on radio appearances...including my name, where I live, my background as analyst/trader/money manager, my work at cnn, and more...
Stop the bullshit and tell us who you are.
You said,
i have no fucking clue who steve sailer is...i am not z...keep things straight, and stop insulting me...i have worked my ass off for 20 months building this website and providing content and attempting to create awareness among people about these issues...i do not need to waste my time responding to stupid attacks...
I think you can figure out who steve sailer is:
http://isteve.blogspot.com/
http://www.isteve.com/
http://sailerfraud.blogspot.com/
For the last fucking time...I am not z...nor am I Steve Sailer...I had never heard of Steve Sailer until you brought him up...if you had any idea how much z and i have fought over the past 18 months, how he's been banned by me a few times, you would realize the sheer stupidity of your suggestion...
You have seriously worn out my last nerve with this insulting bullshit...you are no longer welcome here...
Fine. If you aren't z then I have no quarrel with you.
---
You're missing the point...it's not about your quarrel with me...it's now about my distaste for you...this isn't your site, you don't make the rules...
Why don't you take some light and sanity to a site that caters to pompous over inflated people who know it all.
It must be demeaning for you to deal with us,
"insulting, uncouth and uneducated nonentities hiding behind anonymity, Or should I be more generous and call you clowns?"
Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out!
It has nothing to do with hiding...
Zero Hedge and the many Tyler Durdens are all anonymous...
Yves Smith of Naked Capitalism...that's not her real name...anonymous again...
Calculated Risk is anonymous....but his name bill McBride is known by some...
I could go on and on....
Do you count when I shortened my names...Zarathustra to Zara to Z? If yes, then there could be six or seven names.
Just curious...
"Crist James...This is why you're getting banned...you wrote "IF you're not Z"...after I spent an hour laying it out for you last night, you still doubt me..."
You didn't spend an hour laying out your identity. You spent an hour laying out your position on AIG.
Now you emerge as the great Larry Doyle who is so far above me that I'm not even worthy of talking to.
Z didn't deny that he is Steve Sailer but I suppose he will shortly.
When he attacked all the commenters here, that was enough for me...then he continued to make the same implication...so I banned him...simple stuff...you have nothing to worry about...things are back to normal...
"insulting, uncouth and uneducated nonentities hiding behind anonymity, Or should I be more generous and call you clowns?"
I have already found my non entity, seek your straw man James…
http://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2010/02/26/killing-your-strawman-the-path-to-freedom/
It is amazing that you feel you are the only educated person out there in the big old world, your process of “educated” deduction sure blew it. When I stated a while back that I was an unabashed redneck of disadvantaged Appalachian descent, I did not mean for you to take it so literally, I am edgeamacated.
I love this place...