Quantcast
Feeds: Email, RSS & Twitter

Get Our Videos By Email

 

8,300 Unique Visitors In The Past Day

 

Powered by Squarespace

 

Most Recent Comments
Cartoons & Photos
SEARCH
« Ed Schultz, ignorance personified: "I'd cheat to keep Brown from winning, anything to keep the bastards out!" | Main | Daily Bail Radio Appearance: Stephen Friedman Gets Annihilated -- Where Is The SEC? »
Tuesday
Jan192010

This Is Getting Ugly: Olbermann Says Scott Brown Is A Homophobic, Racist Teabagger (VIDEO)

Video:  Keith Olbermann on Massachusetts GOP Senate candidate Scott Brown -- Jan. 18

  • “In short, in Scott Brown we have an irresponsible, homophobic, racist, reactionary, ex nude model, teabagging, supporter of violence against women, and against politicians with whom he disagrees. In any other time in our history this man would have been laughed off the stage, as an unqualified, and a disaster in the making by the most conservative of conservatives. Instead the Commonwealth of Massachusetts is close to sending this bad joke to the Senate of the United States.”

-----

Featured comments:

I've lived in Mass off and on for over 12 years, now, and I think Coakley has always had some kind of govt. job or other in Boston.  She's worse than an incumbent.  She's like bad plumbing -- been there forever, can't be fixed.  Better to just rip it out and start fresh.

I hope Brown wins, but Scott Brown is not going to breathe new life into anything, least of all the Constitution.  He's nothing more than a country-club Republican who voted for the disastrous Romney-care program in Mass.  Moreover, check out his idiotic stance on the bank tax -- he talks as if the banks just took out a little loan, dutifully paid it back, and are now being picked on by socialistic Democrats. As if.

By all means, root for a Coakley loss and a finger in Obama's eye, but I hope we will be tarring and feathering Scott Brown this time next year.

James H

-----

 

 

 

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (69)

I never liked totally biased, socialist, not in touch with the real world, cry in my beer Keith Olbermann.
This vicious vent from him exposes the true person he is!
It's okay to have an opinion as a media frontman, but unabashed personal bashing is not professional - get off the air!
Jan 19, 2010 at 11:33 AM | Unregistered CommenterRonnie Musacchia
I cannot believe the vile garbage and lies I heard coming out of Obermann's mouth. How can such a vile badmouthing character be on the airwaves? I had never heard him before and I will never listen to him again if all he can do is meanmouth someone he doesn't happen to agree with. His lies and garbage he spouts are just w hat we have heard since the last election and in the campaigning before the election. All we have heard is lies coming from congress and Obama. If this is the way of most of the demoncrats I would gladly vote for Mr. Brown if I lived in Mass. HE SEEMS TO HAVE SOME DECENCY AND COMMON SENSE WHICH IS MORE THAN I CAN SAY FOR Obermann. GOOD LUCK MR. BROWN AND I HOPE YOU WIN THE ELECTION AND BEAT THE SOCKS OFF THE demoncrats. Some one as vile mouthed as Obermann needs to be taken off the air. THAT IS AIR POLUTION!!!
Jan 19, 2010 at 12:05 PM | Unregistered CommenterJeannie B
It is a shame most of the comments come from people who do not or cannot deal with the facts. It is also a shame the people doing the comments place themselves in a labeled group against another label group. We are not members of a group. We are individuals! All memebers of groups are not the same! The labeling of groups is how the handful of elites running the country keep us divided, while they rape pillage and plunder our country! As for Ronnie Mussachia comment about socialism, he obviously does not take the time to either know what the word means or the fact we are a combination of a socialistic republic! What does he call the health insurance provided to our congressional memebers? What does he call our defense department? What does he call medicare and medicaid? What does he call public education? What does he call our law enforcement agengies? The are all organizations where the people have decided we need for the good of the people and country! These are all socialistic! As forJeannie B., she spouts hate with no facts to back up what she states. Then she is more interested in beating the other group then what the facts are and what is best for the country! She is a pawn of the elites and speaks and eats their lies like candy! Quit thinking it is them or us. Good citizens take the time to find out the facts, before they speak! We are all Americans and should take the time to find out what the truth is and what is best for the country, not our so called group! As for lies, where were these people when our goverment was lying to get us to go to war? Where was Jeannie B. and Ronnie Mussachia then? Where were you when the goverment lied about toture? Where were they when the goverment lied about the bank bailout? Where were they when the goverment, under their lies of terroism, took away most, if not all of our rights in the quote unquote Patriot Act? Where were these commentators when the goverment began to spy on all Americans telephone, e-mail and internet? Do these commentators even know this stuff? How about the hospitals and pharmeceutical companies killing about 100,000 people every year! What about the doctors all owning a piece of the hospital and the hospitals paying no taxes? What about the billions stolen in no bid contracts given to their cronies for the fake wars! Did the commentators know Halliburtan and the Carlyle Group are Cheney and Bush companies? Where were these commentators when the last administration signed an excutive order allowing them to break the Constitution, once again and arrest and lock up anyone they wanted for no reason and keep them hidden and locked up forever, wiyh out even telling anyone? Well boys and girls wake up and smell the roses! Labels and groups are the work of the elites to keep us divided and them in control! Dig the facts people and quit living in the elites matrix!
Jan 19, 2010 at 12:41 PM | Unregistered Commenterjustice
Liberalism, and its associated politically correct discourse, has evolved over 300 years from the theology of the original Puritan theocracy established in New England in 1620.

The evolution from theocracy to secularism in America was a very long process in America which finally resulted in the United States Constitution and the wall it erected between church and state.

Our real assurance that this wall will never disappear, is the extreme religious pluralism in America. Conservative Jews, Muslims and Christians such as Catholics and Mormons, would love to see the return of theocracy to America, their OWN theocracy. Lucky for us, each theocracy is hostile to all the others and so they cancel each other out.

20th century Liberalism developed in the 19th century from the same Puritanism, and produced the anti-slavery movement, the right of women to vote, prohibition and the Civil Rights movement.

After World War II, liberalism was refined by theologians such as Paul Tillich, Karl Barth and Bishop Pike but the political radicalism of the 1960's rejected Liberalism as at best irrelevant and at worst an embarrassment to enlightened thought.

Theologians have gone underground but they are still active as Liberals.

Cardinal Spellman, Reinhold Niebuhr and many other religious thinkers became reactionary conservatives in the same manner as the apparently orthodox Jewish talk show host, Dr. Laura Schlessinger.

It seems clear that conservative theocracy can never become dominant in America again but Liberalism is more insidious because it is a disguised, hypocritical form of (secularized) religion that tries to persuade, not with reason and facts but, just as other religions to, by repetition of slogans and formulas and by labeling dissenters as heretics:

"homophobic, racist, reactionary, ex nude model, teabagging, supporter of violence against women" ...

Liberals do not think, but push politically correct agendas decided on by various theological authorities, who pontificate from (in the case of Liberalism) universities, liberal religious organizations and think tanks.

It's clear that we need to create a discourse that is free from the distortions of our superstitious, doctrinaire past. The Internet is one of our great hopes.

The 1960's were loud and raucous but the Internet revolution taking place today is more profound and significant.

Don't allow the dinosaur, mainstream media, to dominate your thought and perceptions. You are creating a new world. Succeed in it. Kieth Olbermann is successful in the old one.
Jan 19, 2010 at 12:43 PM | Unregistered CommenterJames Street
I can't believe Oberman holds a spot on a t.v. station. What a joke. Have you looked into his family's background?
Jan 19, 2010 at 12:57 PM | Unregistered Commenterkenandvic
If Barack Obama could make it to the presidency of this country with his lack of qualifications, experience or even love for this country...if he made to this the highest office in the world without showing appropriate documentation of his eligiibilty and instread fighting that demand with millions of likely tax-payer dollars...I say GO SCOTT BROWN... breath new life into the Constitution and soul of Americans.
Jan 19, 2010 at 1:01 PM | Unregistered Commentervalerie eggers
"I say GO SCOTT BROWN... breath new life into the Constitution and soul of Americans. "

I hope Brown wins, but Scott Brown is not going to breathe new life into anything, least of all the Constitution. He's nothing more than a country-club Republican who voted for the disastrous Romney-care program in Mass. Moreover, check out his idiotic stance on the bank tax -- he talks as if the banks just took out a little loan, dutifully paid it back, and are now being picked on by socialistic Democrats. As if.

By all means, root for a Coakley loss and a finger in Obama's eye, but I hope we will be tarring and feathering Scott Brown this time next year.
Jan 19, 2010 at 1:33 PM | Unregistered CommenterJames H
Sorry to double post this....

The Boston Globe reported the final results of the election at 12:45 P.M.

I'm not making this up:

http://bostonist.com/2010/01/19/martha_coakley_wins_with_100_of_pre.php?gallery0Pic=2#gallery
Jan 19, 2010 at 2:15 PM | Unregistered Commentermark mchugh
DB promised not to be fair and balanced. You keep your promises better than Barry Soetoro.
Jan 19, 2010 at 2:53 PM | Unregistered Commentergobias
I had to Wikipedia DailyBail and this is what I found...

A libertarian Democrat is a person who generally supports and upholds a libertarian philosophy while being a member of the Democratic Party of the United States,[1][2][3] and may be referred to as a "libertarian progressive" or "classical liberal." The opinions of libertarian Democrats may differ on some issues from those of members of the Libertarian Party of the United States.
Jan 19, 2010 at 2:56 PM | Unregistered Commentergobias
I know it is a difficult quetion but...Hey DB, who do you think made the decision to pay out at 100 cents on the dollar? Was it Bush? Was it Bernanke? Was it Tim? Was it Volcker? Was it Paulson? Was it the boogeyman? Who do you think made the ultimate decision? Where did the buck stop?
Jan 19, 2010 at 2:59 PM | Unregistered Commentergobias
gobias...jeez...your bull shit detector must be perpetually set at 0...

you don't think it's obvious that i support scott brown in this race...

i posted the olbermann clip because it was complete b.s....and i wanted others to see it....not because i support olbermann's views...
Jan 19, 2010 at 3:27 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
ultimately i think the decision was made by paulson...

read this carefully...

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/09/business/09paulson.html?pagewanted=1&_r=2&ref=business
Jan 19, 2010 at 3:31 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Anyone have any theories why Gobby can't calibrate his BS Detector?
Jan 19, 2010 at 3:46 PM | Unregistered Commentermark mchugh
@ Justice...

It was in impressive post you made...i think you would find that most of us here believe ALL POLITICIANS lie...regardless of party affiliation...we tend to be a skeptical group by nature...
Jan 19, 2010 at 4:13 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
ken and vic wrote...

Have you looked into olbermann's family's background?

-------------

what do you have?
Jan 19, 2010 at 4:15 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Anyone have any theories why Gobby can't calibrate his BS Detector?

------------

he is blinded by love for martha coakley...?
Jan 19, 2010 at 4:16 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
DB, that might work on your devotees (especially Gomp who is easily confused by sarcasm - yours and mine) but you of all people know where I stand.

DB says…you don't think it's obvious that i support scott brown in this race...
Gobias says…I am always one step ahead of you because I know what you are and what you stand for. The idea that you posted this to make fun of a complete leftist idiot like Olbermann is ludicrous. DB, in order for anyone to think you were even slightly making fun of Olbermann’s idiocy, you first have to show a track record of not always supporting the left. Do you think I buy that you posted the video of Sarah Palin as a newscaster because you thought she did a good job. You might be so deluded by the left and its message that even when they hand you shit, you think it is strawberry ice cream. DB, come out of the closet. Is that the first time you have heard that? Sorry, bad joke.

DB says…i posted the olbermann clip because it was complete b.s....and i wanted others to see it....not because i support olbermann's views...
Gobias says…Beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeep, that is my detector going off. U of V really did a number on you. Was it watching all your lib buddies beating the honor code to a pulp that made you so cynical and obvious?

You have the nerve to show me a NYT article. What did John McEnroe say, oh right, YOU CAN’T BE SERIOUS! Published August 2009 (revising history for the left) by Gretchen Mortgenson. Wow, to think that Gretchen is going to continue to bash Bush and pin this on Paulson. Gretchen must have gotten the talking points memo from Rahm. Gretchen has been writing Bush bashing articles since the dawn of time. DB, you would have a thing for her. The only reason that the media is looking back still is because they can’t stand to report on what’s happening now. Obama is a miserable failure. They don’t know what to do. They know that the shit is hitting the fan.

DB, I know what you are, where you stand, what you find funny, and even where you came from. When you post crap, I am going to call you on it. The Olbermann clip, my guess, any Obermann clip is going to be crap. This one was just sad and pathetic. Olbermann is being a dick and a crybaby but it is definitely not on purpose. You know that, he is having a liberal meltdown. Maybe that is too close to home for you and you don’t recognize it. I do enjoy watching the meltdowns, the fact that they are happening so soon is thrilling. We may be done with Barry sooner than even I imagined.

DB, don’t try to sell ice to an Eskimo. If you want to pander to your devotees, great job. I thought you wanted more than that, apparently you don’t.
Jan 19, 2010 at 5:26 PM | Unregistered Commentergobias
gobias...you are wrong on basically every count...and i'm tired of explaining myself...

in fact you are close to delusional...

i'll respond later after i eat...

i am a fiscal conservative who could care less about anything less...if that makes me a leftist in your book so be it....i'm tired of arguing with you...

no one thinks of bush when paulson is mentioned except you...and gretchen morgenson was writing about aig and paulson's role in the decisions...

she wasn't writing about bush...i don't read political articles as you do...politics is a waste of time...but you are obsessed with all the machinations...

you don't see what is obvious to the rest of us...namely that republicans and democrats are exactly the same and both worthless...get a fucking clue...

the rest of us aren't so politically indoctrinated...

bernanke, bush, paulson, mccain, obama, rubin, geithner, friedman, pelosi, reid.,...they are all the same to me..corrupt scumbags..no party affiliation in my mind...

and one last thought, since you think you know the motives behind my every post, if i'm a liberal as you imagine, why do i use every opportunity to destroy nancy pelosi...

several times i put up the cartoon of her smoking weed...i put the hilarious song up earlier in the week where she is annihilated...how does this fit into your delusion about knowing all my motives...i can't stand fiscal spending liberals..i can't stand fiscally liberal republicans...

i want real change...i think the fed gov't should shrink by 50%...how in the hell could any of these beliefs make me a leftist?...


the only answer i can come up with is that you have a serious personality disorder...

i'll ask for the umpteenth time, wtf is your problem?
Jan 19, 2010 at 5:33 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
one last thought...you act like you know me and i know you...i haven't the slightest idea who the f*ck you are and based on your assessment you sure as f*ck don't know anything about me...

it's gotten to the point where i would prefer you leave this site...i will ban your IP if you continue wasting my time with these bullshit attacks...

i want 1 question answered...you support giuliani who is a free spending republican war monger...

i supprot ron paul who would shrink the fed gov't by 50% and end all the wars..

how in the f*ck does that make me a left-leaning liberal...?
Jan 19, 2010 at 5:36 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
and one more thing to show your continued ignorance...you wrote:

U of V really did a number on you. Was it watching all your lib buddies beating the honor code to a pulp that made you so cynical and obvious?

----------------

UVa is a conservative college campus...at least when i attended...i've never heard UVa called a liberal bastion...young republican dominated young democrats 3:1 in campus groups when i was there...

lastly i graduated from uva...u of v is the university of vermont...you have made this mistake repeatedly...
Jan 19, 2010 at 6:00 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
For the record, it''s UVA and UVM (Universitas Viridis Montis).
Jan 19, 2010 at 6:15 PM | Unregistered CommenterJames H
And obviously, the troll is just hungry. It has nothing to do with anything, least of all what this site is about.
Jan 19, 2010 at 6:16 PM | Unregistered CommenterJames H
Too funny, thanks James.
Jan 19, 2010 at 6:18 PM | Unregistered Commentergobias
UVA Alumni -- Tina Fey, Woodrow Wilson, Katie Couric, Laura Ingraham...

Can you guess which one is my favorite?
Jan 19, 2010 at 6:36 PM | Unregistered Commentergobias
You are your favorite, do you touch yourself when you think of how great you are?
Jan 19, 2010 at 6:51 PM | Unregistered CommenterS. Gompers
“(especially Gomp who is easily confused by sarcasm - yours and mine) but you of all people know where I stand.”

I am never confused Gobias, I run a tight OODA loop, and you are simpler than you imagine. Something you and Ken have trouble understanding. Where is Ken anyway, you did not pull a Che Guevera on him to be El Generalisimo Supremo did you?

The Left will love you to death, in my world you are nothing more than meat. There are many fine people coming here seeking answers, you are not one of them.

Hank Paulson is a Republicrat, so in Gobias world, that makes him pure of virtue.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Paulson

“Anyone have any theories why Gobby can't calibrate his BS Detector?”

Gobias has freely stated he supports;

Cross dressers (by virtue of Rudy support)
Hookers on their backs (exploitation thing)
“responsible weapon laws” (gun banner by virtue of Rudy support)
Pro choice “so you could talk women out of abortion” (by virtue of Rudy support)
Marrying your relatives (by virtue of Rudy support)
Adulterers (by virtue of Rudy support)
Same sex marriage (by virtue of Rudy support)
Fiscal irresponsibility, as long as it is Republicrat by pure virtue

I researched these parameters carefully as Gobias half heartedly attempted to with DB, based on his own thought process and parameters, deciphered in his previously posts. I came up with this;

http://online.logcabin.org/

I hope I am wrong using your own investigative process Gobias, I would hate to think you are that much left of me. But hey, it is your life, and I will understand, just stay away from my chickens…

"every woman's man and every man's woman"

The Elder Curio, of Caesar


Did I meet you in a bar in Fairbanks Alaska when you were asking two Eskimo’s what it took to be a Eskimo?
Jan 19, 2010 at 7:26 PM | Unregistered CommenterS. Gompers
UPDATE
Boston Globe claims: "For a few minutes earlier today, we inadvertently published an AP test of an election data feed on this Web page. We regret the mishap."

What the hell is "an AP test of an election data feed"? Seriously. Somebody's got some 'splainin' to do. Maybe there's a legitimate answer, but who even knows what "an AP test of an election data feed" is?

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2010/senate_race/
Jan 19, 2010 at 7:46 PM | Unregistered CommenterJames H
They were trying to "guide" the election, many like to say they voted for the winner, no matter who it is...
Jan 19, 2010 at 7:49 PM | Unregistered CommenterS. Gompers
Now, now, that's just conspiracy talk. Professor Sunstein WOULD NOT approve.
Jan 19, 2010 at 7:54 PM | Unregistered CommenterJames H
There is nothing new under the sun...
Jan 19, 2010 at 7:59 PM | Unregistered CommenterS. Gompers
James...start with Barry Acorn Soetoro.
Jan 19, 2010 at 8:09 PM | Unregistered Commentergobias
For the record, it''s UVA and UVM (Universitas Viridis Montis).
------------

damn and i knew that...gob had me so pissed off...
Jan 19, 2010 at 8:16 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
damn and i knew that...gob had me so pissed off...

Hey, save it for Friedman and Geithner ;-) Their special day is coming up.
Jan 19, 2010 at 8:26 PM | Unregistered CommenterJames H
Geithner will be working for Group of Thirty by the end of 2010.
Jan 19, 2010 at 8:30 PM | Unregistered Commentergobias
Wow, this is a fun one. DB, I have never understood anything Gobias writes, but this is a topper. I do know you, and over nearly 40 years, I don't believe I have ever heard anyone accuse you of secret left-leanings. That said, as we discussed on many occasions, it isn't like one side has it all figured out.

Think about this; Vote-them-all-out got a victory of sorts. Granted, it wasn't an incumbent, but then again, wasn't it?

How, on a day when we are witnessing a historic shift in the landscape, can this be happening? Don't take his bait, he/she is an idiot.

Beer, dude. Beer and lots of it!!!!
Jan 19, 2010 at 10:35 PM | Unregistered CommenterOberron4life
BTW, Olberman just sucks. Everything about his pathetic, downward spiraling life and career just suck. Screw him.
Jan 19, 2010 at 10:36 PM | Unregistered CommenterOberron4life
Oberron, I've lived in Mass off and on for over 12 years, now, and I think Coakley has always had some kind of govt. job or other in Boston. She's worse than an incumbent. She's like bad plumbing -- been there forever, can't be fixed. Better to just rip it out and start fresh.
Jan 19, 2010 at 10:40 PM | Unregistered CommenterJames H
I love how none of you have any answers - only your own egos to stroke on how intelligent you think you are. You're everything that's wrong with this country. Just sit back and play political armchair quarterback instead of actually getting out from behind your computers and your endless expounding to actually be part of the solution. Geez....
Jan 19, 2010 at 10:46 PM | Unregistered Commenternoanswers
Ober, yes, historic for the GOP. Thanks for the kind words and helping us celebrate our victory. There are bigger battles ahead for us, the Reagan Republicans. I hope that the libs continue their meltdown and push their failing agenda even harder. Let the games begin. Ober, welcome to the game.
Jan 19, 2010 at 11:09 PM | Unregistered Commentergobias
@ no answers...

i'll give you a pass because i'm in such a good mood....but i can venture that you have spent little time around here and likely none in our discussions...

i'll let you in on a little secret...though we are not great in number, the regulars here are the smartest group you will find anywhere on the vast interweb...

we do have answers...we offer them every day...you just haven't been here listening...

and you probably don't know this either, but just about everyone here is an independent...fed up with both parties...

you want to know how we feel about things in a nutshell...stop the stimulus, stop the bailouts, stop the deficit spending...and stop the wars...

i think i can safely say that we all believe in limited government and fiscal discipline...just about everyone of us is a libertarian...

but we accept any and all who might share our goals on any of these issues...

Jan 19, 2010 at 11:10 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
oberron wrote:

BTW, Olberman just sucks. Everything about his pathetic, downward spiraling life and career just suck. Screw him.

-----------------

and to think that you and i together witnessed the launch of his espn career, and were mesmerized literally, by his writing style and overall approach to sports journalism...

to see him become so often a mouthpiece for bullshit, honestly sucks...because 18 years ago or so he changed sports broadcasting forever...and we both know it...
Jan 19, 2010 at 11:19 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
I love how none of you have any answers - only your own egos to stroke on how intelligent you think you are. You're everything that's wrong with this country. Just sit back and play political armchair quarterback instead of actually getting out from behind your computers and your endless expounding to actually be part of the solution. Geez....
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

You make a great point. I only disagree on one point; there is an awful lot of intelligence on this site, backed by an incredible amount of research and data, (with the exception of gobias who is genuinely stupid.)

But you are right, if this is where it ends, then it is all a waste of time. It doesn't have to end here. Join the cause, vote them all out. Run for office, you might find support right here. Be public, make them listen.

But don't be afraid to start here. Jump on in, the water is fine.
Jan 19, 2010 at 11:20 PM | Unregistered CommenterOberron4life
If you want support in here, think Libertarian Democrat.

-------------

edited by DB...gobias...you're done...your IP is now banned...
Jan 19, 2010 at 11:23 PM | Unregistered Commentergobias
to see him become so often a mouthpiece for bullshit, honestly sucks...because 18 years ago or so he changed sports broadcasting forever...and we both know it...

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

No argument here. Except, was it really 18 years ago? Don't remind me.
Jan 19, 2010 at 11:24 PM | Unregistered CommenterOberron4life
Hey DB, post one of your funny bits, how about zombie Ted Kennedy. Funny stuff, really.
Jan 19, 2010 at 11:29 PM | Unregistered Commentergobias
you got a zombie kennedy movie and i'll gladly post it...hell i liked reagan personally...too much spending though in my book...high deficits/gdp for his era...but still i liked him...

i've hated teddy kennedy since i was 17 and read about Chappaquiddick for the first time ...

-------------

you're an over-sensitive bitch sometimes gobias...can't stand to see anyone you admire made fun of...that's a sign of insecurity...
Jan 19, 2010 at 11:36 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Wow whatever happened to toleranc e ? Olberman is a racist hate filled hetro phobe!!! What ever happened to the people voting for who they wanted without be attacked?
Jan 20, 2010 at 5:31 AM | Unregistered CommenterRev. Darwin
Hey DB,

I'm anti-censorship, but in Gobby's case, I'll make an execption.

Good Riddance!
Jan 20, 2010 at 9:29 AM | Unregistered Commentermark mchugh
MSNBC! You all should be ashamed. I belong to a Tea Party and Scott Brown is a true Patriot if you don't like America then move. I never watch MSMBC because you want are on the wrong path and do not do true reporting. So get off the air because nobody is watching. Do you ever really look at your poll numbers.
Jan 20, 2010 at 1:26 PM | Unregistered CommenterAmanda

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.