Madoff Emails CNBC From Prison, Accuses JPM Of Fraud
Update - Madoff Sends Email To Fox News Accusing JPM
Madoff is now second guessing his guilty plea.
Scott Cohn on Madoff's missives from prison.
'Frustrated' Madoff Now Second-Guessing His Guilty Plea
Quote:
"You should be aware that I have continued to offer Picard information concerning the complicity of the banks. I was the only person in my firm that dealt with the officers that handled my account. Not Frank (DiPascali, a Madoff lieutenant who has pleaded guilty to fraud charges) nor anyone else. I have little doubt that the information I could provide would clearly demonstrate the vital role JPMorgan and other major banks played in carrying out my fraud, including their role in handling the accounts of my major customers. The ball is in his court."
---
The interview that set the chain of events in motion:
Madoff and big banks complicit in fraud.
Update - Madoff Sends Email To Fox News Accusing JPM
Background
Madoff: Banks Knew I Was a Crook (NYT Interview)
Madoff Trustee Sues JPMorgan: "They Were At The Very Center Of Madoff Fraud"
Bernie Madoff, Allen Stanford Tried To Ensnare Libya's Gadhafi In Ponzi Scheme
The Madoff Liquidator - 60 Minutes
Citigroup Saw Warning Signs, Knew Of Madoff Fraud; Picard Suit Wants $430M
Harry Markopolos On 60 Minutes
Harry Markopolos: “Don’t Trust Your Government”
JPM Did A Cost-Benefit to See If It Was Worth Keeping a Ponzi Schemer As a Client
Reader Comments (21)
http://dailybail.com/home/chasing-bernie-madoff-film-trailer-for-new-documentary-starr.html
........
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/02/21-6
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2281769/Parents-fury-TSA-detains-wheelchair-bound-daughter-3-theyre-trying-fly-Disney-World-family-vacation.html
"You should be aware that I have continued to offer Picard information concerning the COMPLICITY OF THE BANKS," Madoff wrote. "I was the only person in my firm that dealt with the officers that handled my account. Not Frank (DiPascali, a Madoff lieutenant who has pleaded guilty to fraud charges) nor anyone else. I have little doubt that the information I could provide would clearly demonstrate THE VITAL ROLE THE MAJOR BANKS... PLAYED, IN CARRYING OUT MY FRAUD, including their role in handling the accounts of my major customers. The ball is in his court."
So Madoff is complaining that Irving Picard, the trustee, is in possession of information implicating "major banks" in the fraud, but is not acting on it. Why is this? The article provides a big fat clue:
"Picard and his firm, BakerHostetler, have billed more than $600 million in fees and expenses, money that is paid by Wall Street firms through their dues to the Securities Investor Protection Corporation."
$600 million. Really? That sounds like an awful lot for a law firm that's paid out only $5 billion to victims of Madoff's fund. By way of comparison, the largest bankrupty in U.S. history was Lehman Brothers. In that case, "Jenner & Block LLP, the law firm chaired by Lehman examiner Anton Valukas, earned $42 million for a year’s work producing a 2,200-page report on the bankruptcy that was published in a Manhattan bankruptcy court last week."
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2010/03/17/lehmans-bankruptcy-bill-hits-678-5-million
So in comparison to the $40 million in legal fees for the biggest bankrupty ever, the $600 million in services for the Madoff case--which, as the CNBC article states, "is paid by Wall Street firms"--looks a lot more like hush money than straight legal fees.
Strange that Cohn and CNBC aren't interested in checking out Madoff's allegations when there is so much verifiable information in them, no?
http://dailybail.com/home/madoff-trustee-sues-jpmorgan-for-64-billion-they-were-at-the.html
Here's another piece.
http://dailybail.com/home/tales-from-the-banking-cesspool-madoff-the-unethical-jpmorga.html
The upshot here: after buying Bear Stearns in March of '08 (where Madoff had a long trading relationship), JP Morgan execs smelled a rat and pulled all their funds from Madoff accounts. However, they allegedly failed to tell any of their clients to pull their funds, and these were clients who had invested with Madoff at JPM's recommendation. Not to mention that they didn't contact the SEC to report their suspicions.
---
It's a ridiculous sum. My jaw dropped when I heard Cohn.
Most damningly, sometime before or after that meeting, JPMorgan did a cost-benefit analysis to determine what would happen IF Madoff turned out to be a ponzi scheme. AND it insured against the chance of Madoff being a fraud.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/42610852
Over billing is a crime, btw...
http://www.foxbusiness.com/business-leaders/2013/02/22/madoff-to-fbn-maintain-scrutiny-on-banks-and-feeder-funds/
"As you know, the popular press has demonstrated considerable interest in the extent to which mortgage-backed securities were sold to investors with the knowledge that their ratings were vastly erroneous. (This presumes, of course, that the mortgage paperwork was properly conveyed to investment trusts in the first place.) By curious contrast, the press has expressed no interest at all in what is a far more disturbing feature of mortgage-backed securities, namely, that many are not backed by mortgages at all. This has been demonstrated in studies and discussed by people such as Abigail Field, Adam Levitin, and Christopher Whalen (the latter in connection with Bear Stearns).
"Unless all of these people have been misinformed, it begs another question altogether: why is Bernard Madoff being singled out in a multi-trillion dollar sea of fraud? I am most interested in what thoughts you might have on this matter."
I think Madoff would make a fantastic addition to a film explaining the soup-to-nuts fraud that is the U.S. financial system and--more fundamentally--the mockery that the U.S. justice system makes of the rule of law. Ever since the Magna Carta was signed, the law must apply equally to all. If what Madoff did was a crime, then 100,000 bankers belong next to him in prison. Failing that rectification, a simpler one comes to mind: Bernie Madoff needs to be set free.
Just sayin.
---
I remember the Grisham novel and then the movie with tom cruise where over-billing was a key plot line. Can't remember the name.
Isn't Bernie jailed somewhere in NC...
In all honesty, I've never felt too bad for Bernie's customers. They missed the warning signs. And before it's over they will get a substantial portion of their principal returned, minus Picard's Lilliputian fee.
I thought Bernie should have gotten 10 years, given his age at the time prosecution. Give the guy a chance to die outside of prison. I think it's ridiculous that no one from any of the complicit feeder funds has been prosecuted. They knew it was a giant fraud, and yet continued to lure customers.
And I also agree with you re: feeder funds. What about these guys? That Ezra guy? That Connecticut family who fled to their private island? Bernie goes down alone, essentially, and that's enough flesh for the DOJ? And I still cannot believe that $600mil number. Picard must have nice places in the Hamptons and Palm Beach now...
You shouldn't. Many invested with him on the belief that his high rate of return was due to insider trading or, like Josie says, "because they thought he was front-running." Madoff was, after all, the former head of NASDAQ.
http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/article/145115/I-Knew-Bernie-Madoff-Was-Cheating--That%27s-Why-I-Invested-with-Him?tickers=%5Edji,&gspc,%5Eixic
There's an interesting article that says every Ponzi schemes require two separate deceptions [with the 3rd layer below it all that is unaware that there's anything wrong to begin with]. In the case of Madoff, the first layer is the Ponzi itself (known to and profitable for only the Ponzi's managers), while the 2nd layer is the insider trading angle that reeled investors in (who know something is wrong, but have mis-diagnosed the problem).
The author says the U.S. financial system is a Ponzi scheme run by the ESF (1st layer), with the 2nd layer being things like the New World Order, UFOs, the Illuminati, etc. [with the 3rd layer believing everything on TV]. Scary, no?
http://www.marketskeptics.com/2011/06/the-structure-of-a-ponzi-scheme.html
"complicit feeder funds"
This would appear to be the contention Madoff is making from the Butner Federal Correctional Facility.
A: Bernie never asked for a Bailout.