Feeds: Email, RSS & Twitter

Get Our Videos By Email


8,300 Unique Visitors In The Past Day


Powered by Squarespace


Search The Archive Of 15,000 Videos




Hank Paulson Is A Criminal - Pass It On

"The Federal Reserve Is A Ponzi Scheme"

Get Our Videos By Email


Bernanke's Replacement: Happy Hour In Santa Cruz

Must See: National Debt Road Trip

"Of Course We're Not Going To  Payback the Chinese."

Dave Chappelle On White Collar Crime

Carlin: Wall Street Owns Washington

SLIDESHOW - Genius Signs From Irish IMF Protest

SLIDESHOW - Airport Security Cartoons - TSA

Most Recent Comments
Cartoons & Photos
« VIDEO: Marine Vet At Occupy Wall Street Tells Sean Hannity To "F*CK OFF" For Saying Protesters 'Hate Liberty' | Main | Fed Governor Who Resigned Over QE2: 'Bernanke Went Big' »

JPMorgan, BofA Face Federal Money Laundering Probe

More bad news for Jamie.


JPMorgan, BofA Face Federal Money Laundering Probe

New York Times

Federal and state authorities are investigating a handful of major American banks for failing to monitor cash transactions in and out of their branches, a lapse that may have enabled drug dealers and terrorists to launder tainted money, according to officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

These officials say they are beginning one of the most aggressive crackdowns on money-laundering in decades, intended to send a signal to the nation’s biggest banks that weak compliance is unacceptable.

Regulators, led by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, are close to taking action against JPMorgan Chase for insufficient safeguards, the officials said.  The agency is also scrutinizing several other Wall Street giants, including Bank of America.

The comptroller’s office could issue a cease-and-desist order to JPMorgan in coming months, an action that would force the bank to plug any gaps in oversight, according to several people knowledgeable about the matter.  But the agency, which oversees the nation’s biggest banks, has not yet completed its case.  JPMorgan is in the spotlight partly because federal authorities accused the bank last year of transferring money in violation of United States sanctions against Cuba and Iran.

In addition to the comptroller, prosecutors from the Justice Department and the Manhattan district attorney’s office are investigating several financial institutions in the United States for criminal activity, according to law enforcement officials.

In April, the regulator issued a cease-and-desist order against Citigroup for gaps in its oversight of cash transactions. The order cited “internal control weaknesses including the incomplete identification of high-risk customers in multiple areas of the bank.”  A person close to the bank attributed part of the problem to an accident when a computer was unplugged from anti-money-laundering systems.

Any regulatory action against JPMorgan would be another black eye for its chief executive, Jamie Dimon, and the bank, which was rattled this spring by a $5.8 billion trading loss. That misstep brought additional scrutiny of the bank’s risk controls and compliance efforts.

Last year, JPMorgan agreed to pay $88.3 million to the Treasury Department, which had accused the bank of thwarting United States sanctions by processing roughly $178.5 million for Cubans in 2005 and 2006. Even after bank officials spotted the questionable transactions in 2005, the Treasury said, they failed to report the problem to federal authorities. JPMorgan also made an improper $2.9 million loan in 2009 to a bank tied to Iran’s government-owned shipping line, according to the Treasury Department.

In a 2011 statement, Treasury officials called the bank’s actions “egregious,” adding that JPMorgan’s “managers and supervisors acted with knowledge of the conduct constituting the apparent violations and recklessly failed to exercise a minimal degree of caution or care.”  At the time, JPMorgan said that it had not dealt directly with institutions in Cuba and Iran and that it had merely acted as a middleman.

Earlier this summer, British bank HSBC Holdings Plc set aside $700 million to cover investigations that could result in one of the biggest ever settlements or fines. A U.S. Senate report criticized a "pervasively polluted" culture at the bank. The Senate panel examined transactions tied to Mexico, Iran, the Cayman Islands and Saudi Arabia.

Last month, New York's banking regulator reached a $340 million settlement with British bank Standard Chartered Plc after the regulator investigated transactions tied to Iran.

Continue reading...


Here's the best analysis we've seen of this story:

When I first read that the government was going to investigate JP Morgan Chase for money laundering, I thought this was another case where the government continued to give wrist slaps–in the form of softball fines–to banks for behavior that never really changed.  And to some degree that will be the case.  After all, little more than a year ago Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control accused Jamie Dimon’s company of a whole slew of things, including sending Iran a ton (literally) of gold bullion.  And in spite of the fact OFAC said JPMC substantially cooperated with their investigation so they could give it a softball fine, the settlement actually made it clear they had done anything but.  Though the softball fine may have also had something to do with what I suspect was cooperation on setting up the Scary Iran Plot.

Read the rest at Empty Wheel...



Photos by William Banzai

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (7)

(Reuters) - JPMorgan Chase & Co's compliance with U.S. anti-money laundering laws is being reviewed by a banking regulator, a source said, making the largest U.S. bank the latest target of a wide investigation of how banks prevent transactions involving drug money and sanctioned countries.

Sep 17, 2012 at 10:19 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Sep 18, 2012 at 12:28 AM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
The statute of limitations will be up before anybody notices how to correctly spell Dimon's name for the docket. This is your standard hostile corporate takeover, with the corporate identity of the United States of America being handed over to (corporate)The English Crown as another FINAL step of recolonization. It does not have to be, and many are aware and waiting for pussy mewling CFRtv poodle Americans to wake up and bitch-slap their congressmen into obedience. Or lose their way of life indefinitely because the military is about to make a rough transition back to constitutional normalcy.
It is to the strategic economic advantage of The English Crown to financially destroy the U.S. as economic competition. Economic competition is a relatively new idea to the Brits without slaves. So they must utilize treachery and back-stabbing with 'plausible deniability.
Sep 18, 2012 at 11:04 PM | Unregistered CommenterHoward T. Lewis III
Hey DB, Here is an interesting piece that seems to recirculate around the news once a year or so. If you all have gold check em out. http://www.myfoxny.com/story/19578206/fake-gold-bars-turn-up-in-manhattan
Sep 19, 2012 at 4:13 PM | Unregistered CommenterSKINFLINT
I saw that Skin, thanks. I have a post coming up.
Sep 19, 2012 at 8:08 PM | Unregistered CommenterDailyBail
Here is an ad that ran for this event at Fordham University today...

Government, Secrecy, and National Security: The Government’s Need for Secrecy vs. the Public’s Right to Know

Hosted by: The Center on National Security at Fordham Law School

Tuesday, October 16, 2012

9:30 A.M. – 4:30 P.M.

McNally Amphitheatre
Fordham Law School
140 W. 62nd St, New York, NY 10023


9:30 A.M. – 9:45 A.M. - Breakfast Reception

9:45 A.M. – 10:00 A.M. - Introductory Remarks by Karen Greenberg

10:00 A.M. – 11:15 A.M. - Panel One: Government and the Need for Secrecy. Kenneth Wainstein, Judge James Robertson (Ret.), Neil MacBride, Moderator: Andrew Kent

11:15 A.M. – 12:30 P.M. - Panel Two: Secrecy and its Many Meanings. Steven Aftergood, Genevieve Lester, Ben Wizner, Moderator: Marty Lederman

12:30 P.M. – 1:15 P.M. - Lunch Break

1:15 P.M. – 2:45 P.M. - Panel Three: Leaks and the Public’s Right to Know Scott Shane, David Pozen, Scott Horton, Moderator: David McCraw

3:00 P.M. – 4:30 P.M. - Panel Four: Secrecy versus Transparency: Future Considerations. Glenn Fine, John Rizzo, Stephen Vladeck, Moderator: Karen Greenberg

RSVP by emailing nationalsecurity[at]law.fordham.edu with “Secrecy” in the subject line.

The Center would like to thank our conference sponsors: JPMorgan Chase & Co., the William C. Bullitt Foundation, and Friends of Center on National Security at Fordham Law.

Source: Cryptome.

Note the sponsors.
Oct 16, 2012 at 6:31 PM | Unregistered Commenterjohn

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.