Thursday
Aug182011
Jim Rogers: "Geithner Is Incompetent, He Hasn't Done Anything Right For 15 Years, He's ALMOST As Bad As Bernanke" (VIDEO)
Reuters Video - Jim Rogers holds court - Aug. 9, 2011
Thought this was entertaining. Runs 3 minutes, and the Geithner-Bernanke comparison comes 1 minute into the clip.
Reader Comments (18)
First there was Washington state's suit against Recon Trust for illegal foreclosures:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-08-05/bofa-s-recontrust-unit-sued-by-washington-state-over-foreclosure-practices.html
Now it's New York's turn (via MBIA):
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-08-18/bofa-mortgage-risk-may-rise-9-billion-if-new-york-judge-sides-with-mbia.html
Is BofA the 2011 meltdown's answer to 2008's Lehman Brothers, or will Turbo Timmay and Benny Bananas step in with more bailouts?
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2-million-bet-bank-america-will-be-4-november
Stay tuned, I guess.
Europe is so completely, undeniably fucked.
At some point bond-holders somewhere will eat a credit write down. Just ask so-called unsubordinated bond holders of our good buddy General "Evil Knievel" Motors. It's hard not to see that happening in Germany, what with those rioting, Benz-destroying Krauts.
People are seriously fed up with this shit. We're back to Nixon-era anger, Tricky being the last president who truly responded to the people. (Look up Royko's column the man without a face.) I believe the last constitutional amendment passed on RMN's watch, and passed quickly and grass-roots style.
This is a prolix way of saying the financial crisis is turning political, and it is turning so fast. It's just hard for me to see a charlatan loser pig bank from Charlotte surviving this calendar year of banker bloodlust.
---
That would be the best outcome. The hole in BofA's balance sheet would be similar to Lehman. Maybe $500 billion of real losses, considering the HELOC issue you mention. You also said once that Yves told you about BofA asking mortgage holders to make a $1 dollar payment so that could claim that the loans were not delinquent, or some absolutely crazy shit like that. I would think there are a lot of bodies buried in that sheet.
"On a home equity loan, or on a second mortgage, unlike a first mortgage, the bank would call you up literally on Day 89. If it’s Day 90, they have to show it as delinquent. The could literally call you up on Day 89 and say, 'Pay me a dollar.' I’m not kidding you. They’re permitted to do negative amortization. If somebody literally pays you a dollar on Day 89, they can declare it current. So they go out to the media saying, 'Oh, you know, our book is fine; people are still paying.' They can maintain the fiction. And the regulators are giving them a free pass on this because the regulators don’t want to admit—don’t want the banks to look as bankrupt as they are because Timothy Geithner and Company went through all these stress tests and said the banks are healthy. God forfend, after going through this charade in 2009—the banks are great—and not making them raise more equity, that they’re revealed to be insolvent. Can’t have that."
She has her shit in one bag and is ultra-credible.
Right now we're working on the 90-minute version, which kinda boils down to the Sesame Street version of the crisis. Which needs to be done, I think, you know, really lay it out and not leave it at Wall-Street-bad-bad-bad-bad. No. Explain to people how 3-card monte works at the top.
Crazy story. I'm chatting with Yves, camera off. We're bullshitting about her role in Inside Job (ltd to deleted scenes). She says Ferguson told her you can only have 30 experts. We've got 7 tops depending on your count.
"You hear that, Sean [the director]? We can only have 30 witnesses."
We laugh 'cuz Ferguson had Sony behind him and the budget is $2 million. We're a respectable fraction of that, but way less. We trudge on. It's all good.
---
But it's a strong 7. Ratigan, yves smith, whalen, denninger, and the guy who got so pissed about the fucking bailouts that he gave up his life and started a website.
And that's about it, really. And that's okay. In all the industry screenings we've done, not one person has questioned our "experts." Why not? Because (1) they know what they're talking about, (2) they talk about it passionately, (3) they back up what ordinary Americans feel but maybe can't articulate right, and (4) they all have a sense of humor that distinguishes them from their compadres.
I'm having the time of my life.