Quantcast
Feeds: Email, RSS & Twitter

Get Our Videos By Email

 

8,300 Unique Visitors In The Past Day

 

Powered by Squarespace

 

Most Recent Comments
Cartoons & Photos
SEARCH
« Fed's Lacker 'Chastened' By 2011 GDP Forecast Error, Admits Fed Policy Effects Inflation More Than Growth | Main | VIDEO - 60 Minutes Edits Out Obama‘s Claim That He’s the Fourth Best President In U.S. History »
Monday
Dec192011

If Ron Paul Wins Iowa It Doesn't Count - Fox News

Video - Chris Wallace Gets Blasted - Dec. 15, 2011

Fox News host Chris Wallace argues that if Ron Paul wins the Iowa caucus, the results become meaningless.  The best line from Cenk comes at the very end of the clip.

 

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (16)

Well that didn't take long. Within hours of the news that Ron Paul had taken the lead in Iowa, MSNBC reports on Rick Perry's attack on other presidential candidates for... supporting TARP:

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/12/19/9560068-perry-blasts-gingrich-romney-calls-tarp-single-greatest-act-of-thievery-in-american-history

The only problem is that Rick Perry himself was a proud advocate of the TARP legislation that he now--for the first time ever--correctly characterizes as "thievery":

http://www.nationalconfidential.com/20110916/rick-perry-wrote-letter-urging-tarp-passage/

Will this be MSM's new tack with Paul? "If you can't beat him, steal his issues?" The media's efforts to undermine Ron Paul are absolutely comical.
Dec 19, 2011 at 5:21 PM | Unregistered CommenterCheyenne
It is VERY clear to anyone with half a brain brain that The Establishment is sacred to death of Ron Paul and all the more reason for him to become our president.

Don't be scared, be prepared vote for freedom and liberty!

And remember freedom and liberty means freedom and liberty FROM government and the essence of that freedom and liberty is the proper limitation of governemnt not the EXCESSES of it.

Ron Paul for president 2012 through 2020 because it is going to take that long just to start fixing all the wrong that has been done.
Dec 19, 2011 at 6:04 PM | Unregistered CommenterRC Andrwes
It is VERY clear to anyone with half a brain that The Establishment is sacred to death of Ron Paul and all the more reason for him to become our president.

Don't be scared, be prepared vote for freedom and liberty!

And remember freedom and liberty means freedom and liberty FROM government and the essence of that freedom and liberty is the proper limitation of governemnt not the EXCESSES of it.

Ron Paul for president 2012 through 2020 because it is going to take that long just to start fixing all the wrong that has been done.
Dec 19, 2011 at 6:05 PM | Unregistered CommenterRC Andrwes
Reject
bloodthirsty AIPAC Neocon control
of both political parties and the media.
The Rethug establishment - you know, those guys who will do ANYTHING to beat Dems (think the stealing of Florida for boosh way back when), are willing to throw under the proverbial bus, their own extremely popular, poll-winning, candidate Ron Paul, rather than allow him to win the nomination. They will sacrifice the presidency to the Dems rather than support the most ethical and intelligent scholar and statesman we have seen running for office in a long long time. Utterly stunning.
Dec 19, 2011 at 7:39 PM | Unregistered Commentert brown
I'll tell you ONE thing about Ron Paul: if he DOESN'T win the upcoming presidential election, America's ONLY viable hope for recovering its moral compass and rule of law shall be thru VIOLENT, ARMED REVOLUTION.

PS: The above is merely a PREDICTION and does not constitute my endorsement of armed revolution. In fact, if Ron Paul doesn't win the next elections, I wouldn't lift a PINKY to try to save this POS country we live in. Not a f'ing P-I-N-K-Y.
Dec 19, 2011 at 9:12 PM | Unregistered CommenterOccupyTheGallows
Ron Paul in the Lead.............


..............great do not get too cocky..............

..............they have stolen election before and they can do it again..............

..............however they can only steal a close race..............

..............if they try to steal a Ron Paul landslide, they will be exposed for the criminal that they are..............

..............Do not be satisfied until Ron Paul wins with sixty percent of the vote..............

..............we may not get another chance for two hundred years..............
Dec 19, 2011 at 9:58 PM | Unregistered CommenterRichard Braverman
In the words of Dr. Paul. "Im alone on stage in the debates but not with the people."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMUZIVYuluc&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Dec 20, 2011 at 6:34 AM | Unregistered CommenterDave
I run into more and more people that are Ron Paul supporters. Dr. Paul expects no less in propiganda of sorts during this election. I do not either. My humble guess is before it's over well hear all kinds of bull.

Bring it!

He's my choice.
Dec 20, 2011 at 7:01 AM | Unregistered CommenterDave
How F*cking childishness. The neocons just can't deal with the rise of traditional conservatism.
Dec 20, 2011 at 10:17 AM | Unregistered CommenterCircus
More Ron Paul hysteria from establishment Republicans:

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/70674.html

The lead quote on a Paul victory in Iowa demonstrates the idiocy at work here:

“It would make the caucuses mostly irrelevant if not entirely irrelevant,” said Becky Beach, a longtime Iowa Republican who helped Presidents Bush 41 and Bush 43 here. “It would have a very damaging effect because I don’t think he could be elected president and both Iowa and national Republicans wouldn’t think he represents the will of voters.”

Becky conveniently ignore's McCain's 4th place Iowa finish in her analysis of Iowa's relevance. Even more amusing is Becky's candid narcissism: a Paul victory would be damaging because I say so.
Dec 20, 2011 at 12:40 PM | Unregistered CommenterCheyenne
What do you expect when you play by the one party rules and still do better...they will not concede till their pick is in the WH....and they have bought and paid for most all front runners....except the one that does not count....B.S. exactly...
Dec 20, 2011 at 2:43 PM | Unregistered Commenterdan
Ron Paul for president 2012 through 2020 because it is going to take that long just to start fixing all the wrong that has been done.

---

Exactly....well said...thanks for the links from everyone...i have a bunch of new posts on the way...i have been busy this afternoon finally closing my mortgage refinancing...it's only taken 2 months...what a pain in the ass...i'll be back around in a few hours with a full evening of posting...
Dec 20, 2011 at 3:08 PM | Unregistered CommenterDailyBail
Why are establishment types loading their diapers over Ron Paul? Well, they probably got a load of some graphs like this one...

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/gop-pres-polls.png
Dec 20, 2011 at 4:24 PM | Unregistered CommenterCheyenne
Im Tellin-Ya's, evan the Ron Paul Bashers, are finding out the truth. What will the MSM do when he takes the next one, and the next one........?
Dec 21, 2011 at 5:56 PM | Unregistered CommenterTexas Dar
In light of the CNN smear against Ron Paul by Gloria Borger, I thought everyone should know who her husband is and what he does...

http://www.powelltate.com/about-us/our-people/lance_morgan/
Dec 22, 2011 at 12:59 PM | Unregistered Commenterjohn

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.