Quantcast
Feeds: Email, RSS & Twitter

Get Our Videos By Email

Powered by Squarespace

 

 

Search The Daily Bail Archive Of 15,000 Videos

SEARCH THE DAILY BAIL

SPONSORED BY  

 

Hank Paulson Is A Criminal - Pass It On

Bernanke's Failures Caught On Tape

"The Federal Reserve Is A Ponzi Scheme"


Get Our Videos By Email

THE FED UNDER FIRE: Must See Clip

Bernanke's Replacement: Happy Hour In Santa Cruz

Must See: National Debt Road Trip

"Of Course We're Not Going To  Payback the Chinese."

Dave Chappelle On White Collar Crime

Carlin: Wall Street Owns Washington

SLIDESHOW - The 11 States Most Likely to Go Bust

SLIDESHOW - 7 Really Big Holes - Don't Miss #7

SLIDESHOW - Molotov Cocktails In Greece

SLIDESHOW - The Sights, Sounds & Women of Texas

SLIDESHOW - Genius Signs From Irish IMF Protest

SLIDESHOW - Egyptian Revolution - Graphic PICS

SLIDESHOW - U.K. Student Riots

SLIDESHOW - Airport Security Cartoons - TSA

Most Recent Comments
Cartoons & Photos
SEARCH
« Fannie Mae Posts Record $17B Profit, Still Owes Taxpayers $80 Billion | Main | Boston's JFK Library: Bomb Or Electrical Fire? »
Friday
Apr192013

Boston Police Chief: "There Was No Specific Threat"

From Wednesday's press conference.

Why qualify your response.  Tell us the truth.  Was there a bomb threat before Monday's race?

Boston Police Chief admits police were conducting drills, and we already know there was a huge paramilitary anti-terrorism presence on scene, bomb sniffing dogs at the start and finish lines, spotters on nearby roofs, repeated announcements over the loudspeaker that runners and spectators "shouldn't worry, because this is only a training exercise,"  and more.

In responding to a question about prior knowledge, the Boston police chief says they did not have "specific information that an attack would take place."  Why use the qualifier.  Why not just answer, "No, we didn't have any prior knowledge."  Just the language suggests that something was up.

In any case, if they didn't have any idea, and all the manpower on the scene was just routine, then it's been shown to be a complete waste of time and money.  They probably don't want that meme getting traction, either.

 

---

Why It Matters - Read This

Coach Saw Bomb Sniffing Dogs, Roof Spotters, Police Drills Before Explosion

University of Mobile’s Cross Country Coach, who was near the finish line of the Boston Marathon when a series of explosions went off, said he thought it was odd there were bomb sniffing dogs at the start and finish lines.

"They kept making announcements to the participants do not worry, it's just a training exercise," Coach Ali Stevenson told Local 15.  "I don't believe they were just having a training exercise.  I think they must have had some sort of threat or suspicion called in."

Stevenson said he saw law enforcement spotters on the roofs at the start of the race. He's been in plenty of marathons in Chicago, D.C., Chicago, London and other major metropolitan areas but has never seen that level of security before.

Watch the interview here:

Why Were Bomb Sniffing Dogs At Start & Finish Lines?

 

 

 

Latest updates, links, video and photos are here:

Code Red Declared In Boston

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (5)

My sympathies are with the victims of this tragedy, other than that, I will reserve comment on this subject till I have more facts.
Apr 18, 2013 at 2:02 AM | Unregistered CommenterS. Gompers
I think he's lying. I think there was a credible threat, and that could be why the Navy Seals were there.
Apr 18, 2013 at 4:25 AM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Posse comitatus is still the law of the land: It is against the law for the military to be used to police the U.S. The SEALS had no business being there (other than as off-duty spectators).

In the last ten years there have been numerous bombing attempts across the U.S., nearly all of them subsequently revealed to be the work of the FBI, ginning up patsies to the point of no return, and then arresting them. Maybe this patsy got away from them.
Apr 18, 2013 at 3:52 PM | Unregistered CommenterTanya
NDAA says otherwise.
Apr 18, 2013 at 3:57 PM | Unregistered CommenterSKINFLINT
You asked questions, yet ended them with periods (.) instead of question marks (?). Step it up, guys. That's a pretty obvious FAIL.
Apr 19, 2013 at 7:32 PM | Unregistered CommenterThe Grammar Police

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.