Marshall Auerback Just Called You A Deficit Terrorist
Keynesian loving nonsense follows. You have been warned.
------------
In truth, today’s deficit hawks are nothing more than zealots — poised again to preach their nonsensical theology that government deficits are dangerous and need to be cut, without honestly explaining the full consequences of their recommendations. If households attempt to net save by spending less than they are earning, and businesses attempt to net save (reinvesting less than their retained earnings), then private sector incomes and real output will decline absent an increase in government spending. The danger of premature fiscal tightening was illustrated in the US in 1936-37, when the ending of a war veterans’ bonus and the introduction of Social Security taxes helped push the US back into recession when recovery from the Great Depression was far from complete.
The deficit terrorists only begrudgingly note (if at all) that absent the absorbing role of budget deficits over the last couple of years, we would have had a full Great Depression experience. Government deficits, as Paul Krugman has noted on numerous occasions, saved the world from a much more calamitous experience, yet these deficits are still characterized as something like Norman Bates’s murderous “mother” in the attic of Bates Motel, ready to destroy our helpless population under the nefarious guise of “socialism” or worse. The phobias created by supposedly apolitical organizations such as Pete Peterson’s Concord Coalition or the tea party brigades intimidate policy makers into modifying their fiscal responses to the point where they are insufficient to fill the spending gap left by private sector withdrawal.
----------
Reader Comments (10)
The fact is it's ALREADY 'too late' and America IS ALREADY 'on its knees'. Game over. Remind the last one out to turn off the light before they leave. And if you see Osama Bin Laden, congratulate him on his well-earned victory.
-------------
i think james quinn makes your point here
http://dailybail.com/home/dying-of-debt-a-road-to-perdition-by-james-quinn.html
the numbers are simply too large...
I'm sure Mr. Auerback doesn't read a quality site like this one, but if he does, he should consider the case of someone who maxes out his credit cards for several months just so he can increase his consumption of useless crap. At some point he will have to pay all this back (or default). How's his "personal GDP" going to look then? That's right, it's going to look even worse than it would if Mr. Credit Card had reduced consumption (his "GDP") and saved his money for a while.
i don't know if you were old enough to have been paying attention at the time, but conventional wisdom said george h. bush lost to clinton because he was unwilling to do anything drastic to fight the recession...
in reality he lost because Perot siphoned votes...but my point is that he was the last president to stare into a recession and not fight it...granted, he was upset with greenspan for not lowering rates quickly enough in response, but he did not resort to ridiculous stimulation to attempt to re-start the economy...it was noble, in a way...
http://www.businessinsider.com/robert-rubin-is-back-noooooo-2010-1
----------------------
back to the recession-hating keynesians...i'm guessing auerback is part of the krugman-delong circle and was told to write in favor of more stimulus, deficits be damned...the word went out through the proper keynsian channels and marshall went to work...
It also did not help him that he was one of the greatest gun banners we have ever seen, and the BATF under him were clearly "jack booted nazis".
http://www.nytimes.com/1989/07/08/us/import-ban-on-assault-rifles-becomes-permanent.html?pagewanted=1
http://www.boogieonline.com/revolution/firearms/enforce/nra_thug.html
http://www.paddleking.com/PK2000.htm