UPDATE: What Does Guccifer Know About Hillary's Email And Why Did He Get Such A Sweet Deal From Prosecutors?
COULD GUCCIFER'S DEAL HELP TAKE DOWN HILLARY?
Romanian hacker Guccifer struck a deal with prosecutors and pleaded guilty in Federal court recently. What does that mean for the FBI's case on Hillary Clinton? And what information does Guccifer hold that allowed him to strike such a quick agreement?
Here's Guccifer's Plea Deal... (PDF)
At least two different sets of sealed documents were filed in the case against Romanian hacker Marcel Lehel Lazar, who goes by the moniker Guccifer.
An examination of the federal court docket for his case by LawNewz.com revealed two new entries that were both filed under seal. The fact that the documents were kept secret could be an indication that they contain information related to his plea deal that the feds or a judge wanted to keep under wraps.
Reader Comments (11)
http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/secret-documents-filed-in-case-against-guccifer-who-says-he-hacked-clinton-server/
http://observer.com/2016/05/corruption-is-catching-up-to-the-clintons-and-their-associates/
A $120,000 donation from a Chinese businessman, Wang Wenliang, made through U.S.-based businesses, raised red flags with investigators—along with several other donations, like the $2 million he gave the Clinton Foundation.
=======
http://www.factcheck.org/2015/06/where-does-clinton-foundation-money-go/
http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/05/24/why-i-am-neverhillary/
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-23/banks-are-ordered-by-court-to-defend-libor-antitrust-lawsuit
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2016/05/26/royal-bank-canada-ruin-us-court_n_10132406.html
OIG on Clinton E-Mails
http://cryptome.org/2016/05/state-oig-clinton-emails.pdf
Guccifer Change of Plea
http://cryptome.org/2016/05/lazar-guccifer-027.pdf
Guccifer Plea Agreement: Statement of the Facts
http://cryptome.org/2016/05/lazar-guccifer-027.pdf
Hillary Clinton’s Team Lost a Laptop Full of Her Emails in the Actual Mail
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/09/02/hillary-clinton-s-team-...
The problem is that the parent Company of TDB (IAC) has a very 'special' board member....Chelsea Clinton.
http://iac.com/about/leadership/board-directors/chelsea-clinton
http://nypost.com/2016/09/01/tax-dollars-went-toward-clinton-foundation-...
Taxpayers helped foot the bill for Hillary Clinton’s private email server and helped financially support the Clinton Foundation, a new report finds.
The Politico report, based on government records disclosed under the Freedom of Information Act, revealed that yearly payments of $10,000 from the federal government helped purchase IT equipment — including servers — and helped fund aides who serviced that equipment.
Justin Cooper, one of the aides who helped set up Hillary Clinton’s controversial email system, was at times on the government payroll between 2011 and 2013. Cooper has also done work with the Clinton Foundation and Teneo, the corporate consultancy founded by Clinton aides Doug Band and Declan Kelly.
Band himself even received taxpayer funds until 2013, the report finds. His top-flight firm Teneo launched in 2011.
Politico also finds that the Clinton Foundation’s chief operating officer, Laura Graham, was on the government payroll as well.
On Sept. 16, 2011, the government purchased a $7,707.98 Dell server. On Aug. 2, 2011, the government purchased an Apple Mac mini with Lion Server for $1,284.95. Both were shipped to the Clinton Foundation, according to invoices.
Former presidents are provided $96,600 per year by the US government for staffing expenses. The money is spent at the discretion of the ex-president.
The Clinton Foundation states on its website that “All Foundation employees are paid for work through the Foundation payroll. As a former President, President Clinton has separately allocated funding for a private office and for associated costs (rent, utilities, and salaries and benefits for staff). No Foundation staff are paid for Foundation work with taxpayer dollars.”
But this latest report suggests that is not true.