The Next Bailout -- $165 Billion For Union Pensions -- Sen. Casey Defends His Proposal (Watch Your Money Disappear)
Last week it was the $26 billion teachers bailout and this week troubled union pensions are clamoring for some love. Makes you proud to live in the land of freedom -- the freedom to exercise your moral hazard, at the expense of everyone else.
---
Video: Fox News -- A Democratic senator is introducing legislation for a bailout of troubled union pension funds. If passed, the bill could put another $165 billion in liabilities on the shoulders of American taxpayers. The bill, which would put the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation behind struggling pensions for union workers, is being introduced by Senator Bob Casey, (D-Pa.), who says it will save jobs and help people.
---
Is The Government Bailing Out Union Pension Funds To The Tune Of $165 Billion?
---
Video: 'State of the Unions' author Phil Dine argues union workers have already given up some benefits so they shouldn’t have to give up their pensions -- May 25, 2010
---
The Next Bailout -- $165 Billion for Unions
A Democratic senator is introducing legislation for a bailout of troubled union pension funds. If passed, the bill could put another $165 billion in liabilities on the shoulders of American taxpayers.
The bill, which would put the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation behind struggling pensions for union workers, is being introduced by Senator Bob Casey, (D-Pa.), who says it will save jobs and help people.
As FOX Business Network’s Gerri Willis reported Monday, these pensions are in bad shape; as of 2006, well before the market dropped and recession began, only 6% of these funds were doing well.
Although right now taxpayers could possibly be on the hook for $165 billion, the liability could essentially be unlimited because these pensions have to be paid out until the workers die.
It’s hard to say at the moment what the chances are that the bill will pass. A hearing is scheduled Thursday, which will give the public a sense of where political leaders sit on the topic, said Willis.
Just last week President Obama said there would be no more bailouts.
---
Screenshot
Reader Comments (22)
http://mediamatters.org/research/201005250005
Hannity: Sestak job discussion "was almost written for this law."
Media Matters is paid advertising for the Obama Administration.
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/23801
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=161377
"The idea behind each and every Bilderberg meeting is to create what they themselves call the aristocracy of purpose between European and North American elites on the best way to manage the planet. In other words, the creation of a global network of giant cartels, more powerful than any nation on Earth, destined to control the necessities of life of the rest of humanity, obviously from their vantage point, for our own good and in our benefit – the great unwashed as they call us," he said.
Hmmm, sounds like investing in "silver spoons" might have NOT been such a bad idea after all huh?.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKIBF6ylO8M
Bribery is needed to save money. Offering government jobs for dropping out of contested primaries is okay by Obama.
Gibbs on bribery..."Well, I think the leaders of parties have long had an interest in ensuring that supporters didn't run against each other in contested primaries."
REALLY, WHAT IS A BRIBE?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4XT-l-_3y0
America has loved it for so long now, why stop.
"Hmmm, sounds like investing in "silver spoons" might have NOT been such a bad idea after all huh?."
They tend to make ones ass hurt.
What a revolution for coward Zombies on the Web?lol
Not on the streets?lol
Cowards very happy debating what?lol
lol
SCREAM ON, BASH ON, DELETE ON?LOL
CIVIL UNREST IN USA TIME LINE: NOV 2010-2011
AMEN
Just dont pick me up to early i like to drink beer and the hangovers take a little time. ;)
"They tend to make ones ass hurt."
Poor American bastards. They tend to stick EVERYTHING up their asses.
So why should the Obankster even BOTHER to report future bailout plans? ?
It's NOT like someone's going to do something about it or impede his plans to bailout WHOEVER he wants. The American public has already proven it has a prodigious capacity to take it up the ass endlessly & without flinching.
PS: good luck with the Tea-Bagger thingy. You'll need it.
"The situation puts pension funds into a distinct conflict of interest," he said. "The people who run public pension funds are public officials and political officials who want to use their shareholder leverage to get more votes. If the conflict is not managed properly, it could put pensioners at risk."
Verret also states, lobbying efforts are increasing among public pension funds, causing the intermingling of pension funds with politics. This concerns him, he says, because pension funds nationally are underfunded by about $1 trillion.
Public officials in control of pension money is meant for lobbying, not pensions, hmmmm.
http://www.cleveland.com/business/index.ssf/2010/05/ohio_pension_fund_takes_on_hug.html
http://www.cleveland.com/business/index.ssf/2010/04/ohio_pensions_took_480_million.html
http://www.cantonrep.com/news/business/x932344257/Ohio-pension-funds-lost-480-million-in-Lehman-demise
As I have stated before, public officials are destroying public pensions, good public officials, baaaad union…
In Ohio, 480 million was lost in the public pensions when Lehman Brothers collapsed after public officials had the good sense to invest with them. We will now punish Lehman Brothers soundly by electing John Kasich, former congressman and ex Lehman “window dresser” for governor.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96A-t7BOh4g
John Kasich (R) is an affirmed free trader who voted for NAFT, Most favored Nation status for China, outsourcing, and had an F rating by the NRA as a Congressman.
Out of the frying pan and into the fire for Ohio, so I guess in the end the bailout will really be for lobbying, the Bankers Manifesto marches on…
Ping pong anyone?
It is the asset seizure that pays benefits at a reduced rate, if their are no assets to seize, it will be cat food on crackers for your retirement.
You have posted on the public pensions though, besides, the hero John Boehner says no one needs to retire, if they get the S.S. age high enough, everyone will die before being eligible to draw it. Thereby making it a pass through tax to be exploited elsewhere without having to justify it.
Ah the legacy of our parents not minding the store all those years...
Ever see 70 year old construction workers, linemen, tree trimmers, mechanics, police, firefighters, etc. You will have to fight your way through a million greeters just to shop. Do you think Walmart will hire them all, or do you think poverty will become rampant as people can no longer physically do the work but are still to "young" to retire.
Now that is progress...
---
But doesn't Casey's bill ask taxpayers to bailout the PBGC....in the sense that once these pensions are assumed by pbgc then they will be still be massively underfunded and then taxpayers will have to make up the shortfall...that's at least how i've understood it...
"Our financing comes from insurance premiums paid by companies whose plans we protect, from our investments, from the assets of pension plans that we take over as trustee, and from recoveries from the companies formerly responsible for the plans, but not from taxes."
http://www.pbgc.gov/workers-retirees/benefits-information/content/page14090.html
Dig deeper, and follow the money, the pension issue is way more complex and intriguing than the unions who are being pointed at by those who hate, Tyco, Enron, Lehman Brothers, cronyism by the fund managers, deregulation, etc.. You know pensions are getting seized in other countries to pay off government debts don't you.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aVVM93Y37XgA&refer=home
http://www.afn.org/~govern/mcfadden.html
Ah the legacy of our parents not minding the store all those years...
I owe, I owe, so off to work I go...