The Fed's $2 Trillion Dollar Secret
Federal Reserve Files Appellate Motion To Protect $2 Trillion In Bailout Secrets
This was not unexpected as the Fed continues its struggle. against overwhelming public opinion, not to mention Bloomberg, Fox and a host of other news organizations, to keep details of it's lending and support programs (more than $2 trillion) hidden from public view. The Bloomberg authors believe Bernanke and the Fed are attempting to drag the process out long enough through the court system (the Fed will appeal all the way to the Supreme Court) that the information is no longer wanted.
Inglorious bastards.
-----
Jan. 11 (Bloomberg) -- The Federal Reserve asked a U.S. appeals court to block a ruling that for the first time would force the central bank to reveal secret identities of financial firms that might have collapsed without the largest government bailout in U.S. history.
The U.S. Court of Appeals in Manhattan will decide whether the Fed must release records of the unprecedented $2 trillion U.S. loan program launched after the 2008 collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. In August, a federal judge ordered that the information be released, responding to a request by Bloomberg LP, the parent of Bloomberg News.
“This case is about the identity of the borrower,” said Matthew Collette, a lawyer for the government, in oral arguments today. “This is the equivalent of saying ‘I want all the loan applications that were submitted.’”
Bloomberg argues that the public has the right to know basic information about the “unprecedented and highly controversial use” of public money. Banks and the Fed warn that bailed-out lenders may be hurt if the documents are made public, causing a run or a sell-off by investors. Disclosure may hamstring the Fed’s ability to deal with another crisis, they also argued. The lower court agreed with Bloomberg.
‘Right to Know’
“The question is at what point does the government get so involved in the life of the institution that the public has a right to know?” said Charles Davis, executive director of the National Freedom of Information Coalition at the University of Missouri in Columbia. Davis isn’t involved in the lawsuit.
The ruling by the three-judge appeals panel may not come for months and is unlikely to be the final word. The loser may seek a rehearing or appeal to the full appeals court and eventually petition the U.S. Supreme Court, said Anne Weismann, chief lawyer for Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics, a Washington advocacy group that supports Bloomberg’s lawsuit.
New York-based Bloomberg, majority-owned by Mayor Michael Bloomberg, sued in November 2008 after the Fed refused to name the firms it lent to or disclose the amounts or assets used as collateral under its lending programs. Most were put in place in response to the deepest financial crisis since the Great Depression.
‘Almost Two Years’
“Bloomberg has been trying for almost two years to break down a brick wall of secrecy in order to vindicate the public’s right to learn basic information,” Thomas Golden, an attorney for the company with Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, wrote in court filings. He said the Fed may be trying “to draw out the proceedings long enough so that the information Bloomberg seeks is no longer of interest.”
The Fed’s balance sheet debt doubled after lending standards were relaxed following Lehman’s failure on Sept. 15, 2008. That year, the Fed began extending credit directly to companies that weren’t banks for the first time since the 1930s. Total central bank lending exceeded $2 trillion for the first time on Nov. 6, 2008, reaching $2.14 trillion on Sept. 23, 2009.
Continue reading at Bloomberg >>
Jan 11, 2010 at 6:12 PM
Reader Comments (6)
The New York Times reports that former Alaska governor Sarah Palin has been signed as a contributor to Fox News.
Funny, the Fed's lawyers think they're making a case AGAINST disclosure. Personally, I'd pay good money to see both a bank run and the Fed unable to "deal with another crisis."
“Bloomberg has been trying for almost two years to break down a brick wall of secrecy in order to vindicate the public’s right to learn basic information,” Thomas Golden, an attorney for the company with Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, wrote in court filings. He said the Fed may be trying “to draw out the proceedings long enough so that the information Bloomberg seeks is no longer of interest.”
It is our money, you just can't make this shit up. Truth is stranger than fiction.
---------------
i find myself torn this way as well...i do not wish ill-will upon my country but i think sometimes another crisis is the only way we can get change...
--------------------
http://dealbreaker.com/2009/04/david-kellerman-was-under-rele.php
-------------------
gobias...i don't know anderson cooper...i asked bloomberg reporter mark pittman about this story for you once, and he hadn't heard anything...sorry that i can't help...