SIGTARP Report Says Geithner Is Lying To Taxpayers About AIG, 'Hiding $40 Billion In Losses'
A tax-challenged Treasury Secretary fudging the numbers.
---
Creative accounting from Tim Geithner
By Mary Williams Walsh
The United States Treasury concealed $40 billion in likely taxpayer losses on the bailout of the earlier this month, when it abandoned its usual method for valuing investments, according to a report by the special inspector general for the .
“In our view, this is a significant failure in their transparency,” said Neil M. Barofsky, the inspector general, in an interview on Monday.
In early October, the issued a report predicting that the taxpayers would ultimately lose just $5 billion on their investment in A.I.G., a remarkable outcome, since the insurance company was extended $182 billion in taxpayer money in the early months of its rescue. The prediction of a modest loss, widely reported as A.I.G., the Federal Reserve and the Treasury rushed to complete an exit plan, contrasted with an earlier prediction by the Treasury that the taxpayers would lose $45 billion.
“The American people have a right for full and complete disclosure about their investment in A.I.G.,” Mr. Barofsky said, “and the U.S. government has an obligation, when they’re describing potential losses, to give complete information.”
An official of the Treasury disputed Mr. Barofsky’s conclusions, saying the department appropriately used different methods for different purposes. He said the smaller loss was a projection of future events, and the larger one was the result of an audit, which includes only realized gains and losses.
“If a private company filed information with the government that was just as misleading and disingenuous as what Treasury has done here, you’d better believe there would be calls for an investigation from the S.E.C. and others,” said Representative , the senior Republican on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. He called the Treasury’s October report on A.I.G. “blatant manipulation.”
Senator of Iowa, the senior Republican on the Finance Committee, said he thought “administration officials are trying so hard to put a positive spin on program losses that they played fast and loose with the numbers.” He said it reminded him of “misleading” claims that had paid back its rescue loans with interest ahead of schedule.
Mr. Barofsky said he had written to the Treasury secretary, , in mid-October, after widespread reports in the news media about the possibility that the Treasury could wind down its position in A.I.G. with just a $5 billion loss. He recommended that the Treasury correct the October report, perhaps by adding a footnote saying the methodology for calculating its losses had changed.
He said the Treasury’s statements tended to contribute to a “widespread, but mistaken, belief that TARP is at or near its end.”
##
---
3 excellent Barofsky links:
Oct 5, 2011 at 4:10 PM
Reader Comments (9)
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN2624110020101026
The report...actually not too long...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/25/false-hope-federal-audito_n_773681.html
http://letthemfail.us/archives/6320
http://letthemfail.us/archives/6320
http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=183445
http://www.counterpunch.org/2011/10/05/obama-did-it-all-by-himself/
[snip]
“Change We Can Believe In.” Those fine words fooled a lot of people in 2008. Now they stick in the craw even of Obama apologists for whom all the hopes dashed over the past three years are the fault of Tea Party-Republican obstructionists. Expect to hear a billion dollars worth of that malarkey between now and next November.
But even those who hold Obama blameless must concede that, in every way that matters, his first term has been continuous with George Bush’s second. Yes, there have been small, mainly cosmetic changes; changing circumstances made that inevitable. And there has been a change in style. Where once there stood an inarticulate Buddy Ebsen wannabe — a living reproach to Phillips Andover, Yale, and the Harvard Business School – there is now a silver-tongued orator of whom Columbia and Harvard can be proud. But as for a change of course, a change for the better – forget it! This not even Obama’s cheerleaders can deny.