Feeds: Email, RSS & Twitter

Get Our Videos By Email


8,300 Unique Visitors In The Past Day


Powered by Squarespace


Search The Archive Of 15,000 Videos




Hank Paulson Is A Criminal - Pass It On

"The Federal Reserve Is A Ponzi Scheme"

Get Our Videos By Email


Bernanke's Replacement: Happy Hour In Santa Cruz

Must See: National Debt Road Trip

"Of Course We're Not Going To  Payback the Chinese."

Dave Chappelle On White Collar Crime

Carlin: Wall Street Owns Washington

SLIDESHOW - Genius Signs From Irish IMF Protest

SLIDESHOW - Airport Security Cartoons - TSA

Most Recent Comments
Cartoons & Photos
« How Citigroup Unraveled On Tim Geithner's Watch | Main | MUST READ: Exposing The Obankster In Obama »

SAYONARA: Whalen & Bair Spank Goodbye To Pandit

Chris Whalen and Sheila Bair on the sacking of Citigroup's $261 million man.


Thoughts On Citigroup Post-Pandit

Guest post submitted by Chris Whalen.

The departure of Vikram Pandit as CEO of Citigroup (C) should come as a relief to the markets, regulators and customers – indeed, just about everybody besides the volatility junkies who like to trade this very liquid, very unstable stock.  Apologies to Jim “Mad Money” Cramer. A couple of points:

First, the mess at C starts with the board of directors.  Pandit was brought in as an emergency hire to replace Chuck Prince, the former C general counsel who pretended to be CEO for a very painful but brief period.  The C board at that time was basically a group of cronies who did whatever former CEO Sanford Weil wanted.  Thus when he was toasted in the WorldCom analyst scandal, there was a huge vacuum left behind.

Prince was seen as acceptable by the C board because he was acceptable to former CEO Sandy Weil and his Chairman and political protector Robert Rubin.  Rubin perhaps more than any other single board member, is responsible for the corporate governance fiasco at C.  Now that Dick Parsons, another Weil crony who IMHO also is deeply culpable in this governance mess, has left the scene, C literally has to rebuild its corporate governance and internal controls from scratch. 

Second, the tenure of Pandit at C is yet another case of rape and pillage by a senior manager with no devotion to growing shareholder value.  Like Prince and Weil, Pandit walks away from the wreckage of C with hundreds of millions in compensation.  When are federal regulators going to demand that executive compensation at banks be tied to financial performance?   If Pandit were compensated proportionate to how he rewarded C shareholders, his compensation would be a tenth of what he has received as CEO.

Third point is that I see the choice of the bank’s European and Middle Eastern division, Michael L. Corbat, as a positive for the bank’s shareholders and customers.  C has not had a CEO with OPERATING SKILLS in more than two decades.  Even John Reed, who was shown the door by Weil after the Raul Salinas scandal, was not an operator of banks.  The markets should give Corbat a chance, but his biggest problem is the dysfunctional C board.

Final point is that we should not look for big changes at C in the near term.  C’s business is much smaller than before the crisis, but that also means less ability to generate revenue.  The cash EPS in Q3 2012, ignoring the “extraordinary” charges, was actually quite miraculous.  C is the only bank that actually expanded net interest margins during the period. 

The most important thing for Corbat is to focus on operating the bank and trying to avoid more of these all-to-frequent “extraordinary” charges to earnings.  Corbat needs to get C through the Fed’s next set of stress tests and then focus on running the remaining as well as possible.  You can judge Corbat’s success by how much he is able to stay out of the news. And of course, we will all be watching.



Sheila Bair on Pandit's Firing: "I'm sure Vikram still blames me"


"I viewed Pandit’s resignation as a positive.  The board is doing its job, by opening up a new chapter for Citigroup.  I take at face value what the board said about his departure.  The Citi board is being responsible to shareholders.  The bank's performance under Pandit was very bad.  Citi's board is opening a potentially new direction, and should be commended."

"I think his departure expressed unhappiness with the way the shares were performing.  He got a big payout when he sold his hedge fund to Citi, in excess of $200 million.  Then within months it had to be closed.  His pay as CEO was based on lackluster performance, and shareholders balked.  Of all the big banks, Citi's performance is the worst of the bunch.  So the board is doing its job.  It's opening a new chapter.  And they've chosen someone they'd had experience dealing with, and whose operating capabilities they've been able to assess."

Continue reading at Fortune...


This is pretty funny:

Jim Cramer and Erin Burnett repeatedly stab a Vikram Pandit voodoo doll because the Henry Paulson model was already sold out.


How Pandit made $261 million in 5 years at Citigroup running an insolvent bank

Want To Talk To Vikram Pandit, CEO Of Citigroup? Here’s His Cell Number


PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (14)

Classic rant. Olbermann annihilates Pandit.

This is the best clip I've seen on Pandit in 4 years of running the Bail. I originally posted it in March 2009. Put away partisanship for a minute and just listen.

Oct 18, 2012 at 2:05 AM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Want To Talk To Vikram Pandit, CEO Of Citigroup? Here’s His Cell Number

Oct 18, 2012 at 2:06 AM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Citi Shares Outstanding Under Pandit: From 500 Million To 3 Billion

Oct 18, 2012 at 2:10 AM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Oct 18, 2012 at 3:05 AM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Keith Olberman and Dylan Ratigan both gone. Wonder if telling the truth gets you thrown into the abyss? Ratigan did say he was working on another project. I guess we will see.
Oct 18, 2012 at 7:20 AM | Unregistered CommenterSKINFLINT
Skin, I hope he just took a little time off. I would have to think that he (Ratigan) is A-OK as I have found nothing to suggest otherwise ( I have been looking after DB mentioned he was MIA and the last communication from Dylan was around June 22.-23 2012). Could be he is working on a project of some sorts and wants to keep things under wraps.

Hopefully we will hear from Dylan soon.
Oct 18, 2012 at 7:37 AM | Unregistered Commenterjohn
Pandit the idiot ruined the bank and screwed all the shareholders. One less crook on wall street.
Oct 18, 2012 at 12:07 PM | Unregistered CommenterSell Short
Bob Rubin deserves the blame, along with Geithner. Too bad shareholders can't sue them for keeping Pandit as CEO.
Oct 18, 2012 at 12:21 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail

I'm sure Ratigan is fine and taking a deserved vacation. He'll pop up soon enough.
Oct 18, 2012 at 12:28 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Not since Bernie madoff (made off) with the loot have we another synchronistic name with vikram pandit (bandit)
Oct 18, 2012 at 1:28 PM | Unregistered CommenterJack Black
Good catch, Jack.

How about wall-street fellating geithner.

Does that rhyme with anything?
Oct 18, 2012 at 4:16 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Anyone know which caste Vikram comes from?
Oct 19, 2012 at 11:37 AM | Unregistered CommenterSKINFLINT
The Bob Rubin And Tim Geithner Saved My Ass Caste
Oct 19, 2012 at 12:09 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
I guess he passed the casteing couch test.
Oct 19, 2012 at 12:32 PM | Unregistered CommenterSKINFLINT

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.