Quantcast
Feeds: Email, RSS & Twitter

Get Our Videos By Email

 

8,300 Unique Visitors In The Past Day

 

Powered by Squarespace

 

Most Recent Comments
Cartoons & Photos
SEARCH
« Glenn Hubbard Practices For The Role Of Fed Chairman | Main | Debt Owed To Foreign Countries Now $47,495 Per Family »
Wednesday
Oct242012

REPORT: Fast & Furious, DEA And The Sinaloa Cartel

How The Feds Work With Mexican Cartels To Traffic Drugs Into The U.S.

Business Insider

Leaked emails from the private U.S. security firm Stratfor cite a Mexican diplomat who says the U.S. government works with Mexican cartels to traffic drugs into the United States and has sided with the Sinaloa cartel in an attempt to limit the violence in Mexico.

Many people have doubted the quality of Stratfor's intelligence, but the information from MX1—a Mexican foreign service officer who doubled as a confidential source for Stratfor—seems to corroborate recent claims about U.S. involvement in the drug war in Mexico.

Most notably, the reports from MX1 line up with assertions by a Sinaloa cartel insider that cartel boss Joaquin Guzman is a U.S. informant, the Sinaloa cartel was given carte blanche to continue to smuggle tons of illicit drugs into Chicago, and Operation Fast and Furious was part of an agreement to finance and arm the Sinaloa cartel in exchange for information used to take down rival cartels.

"The major routes and methods for bulk shipping into the US" from Ciudad Juárez, right across the border from El Paso, Texas, "have already been negotiated with US authorities" and that large shipments of drugs from the Sinaloa cartel "are OK with the Americans."

Continue reading...

 

Related:

Source: Fast & Furious Was Meant To Supply Guns To Sinaloa Cartel

 

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (24)

DEA: Mexican Cartels In Chicago Are 'Hiding In Plain Sight' As They Run The City's Drug Game

http://www.businessinsider.com/mexican-cartels-in-chicago-2012-9#ixzz28J0znYTb
Oct 4, 2012 at 1:37 AM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
How Sinaloa cartel boss 'El Chapo' Guzmán got U.S. agents to help him become Mexico’s most powerful drug lord

http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/01/29/el-chapo-guzm-n-mexico-s-most-powerful-drug-lord.html
Oct 4, 2012 at 1:38 AM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
High Ranking Cartel Member Says Operation Fast And Furious Was Meant To Supply Guns To The Sinaloa Cartel

http://www.businessinsider.com/fast-and-furious-guns-sinaloa-cartel-2012-8#ixzz28J1jzaVu
Oct 4, 2012 at 1:38 AM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Quelle surprise. So what else is new? The CIA runs the world drug business, the DEA is the enforcement arm, everyone else involved, is there because when you play in the dirt, you get dirty. We haven't a chance to overcome, short of a revolution, but the American people are too busy watching their T.V. and who's on first, while eating high fructose laced junk food and playing the X-box, proclaiming how bad they are.
Oct 4, 2012 at 3:33 PM | Unregistered CommenterNorman
MERS,Fast& Furious, NDAA,etc. Are we no longer a country of laws & the enforcement same? Is this the end of America or is it just my crazy thinking.
Oct 4, 2012 at 10:59 PM | Unregistered CommenterTR
"High Ranking Cartel Member Says Operation Fast And Furious Was Meant To Supply Guns To The Sinaloa Cartel"

I stated that when this first broke, I believe it was a balance of power play against the Los Zeta's, not that I think it is right...

I did not think training the Los Zeta's at Fort Benning Georgia was right either though, but then, what do I know.
Oct 5, 2012 at 1:54 AM | Unregistered CommenterS. Gompers
Here's more on Zetas at Ft. Benning

http://www.newsnet14.com/?p=107945
Oct 5, 2012 at 4:16 AM | Unregistered CommenterDailyBail
Norman

Good to see you around. Been a long time.
Oct 5, 2012 at 4:17 AM | Unregistered CommenterDailyBail
Great article Steve.
Oct 5, 2012 at 5:15 AM | Unregistered CommenterS. Gompers
Hello D.B., yes a long tyme. Have had lots of mynd bending situations turn up for quite a while. What a ride. When the hell are the real people going to get it together? There is no free lunch, you have to earn your keep, whether or not you like it. Corruption in the U.S.A. today seems to know no bounds. I wonder, if one counts every person, male/female who have served in the military, especially those who can't find a job, lost their home, loved ones, don't have a pot to pee in or a window to throw it out of, will get together, even train those so called warriors of the X-box, and right the wrongs, that the present idiots have set the country on? Don't get me wrong here, for I'm not political, but when I see what's going on today, I shake my head in disgust. Where are the real people who care? Are they sitting on their ass while their brothers & sisters are hurting? Lest everyone forgets, we are all in this together, regardless of who, what, where your heads at. When our government believes that the people are expendable like just so much trash, forging wars all over the M.E., building the Empire, while we here at home slide into poverty so some jerk can count his bucks, then it's either stand up or bend over. I may not be long for this world, because of age, but it's going to be a cold day in hell before I dishonor my service as. honorably discharged U.S.M.C. Vet. What the hell did we fight for?
Oct 5, 2012 at 7:09 AM | Unregistered CommenterNorman
Gomp, here is an update about the drug lab snafu here..

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/2012/10/05/defendants-face-release-lab-scandal/ulnH8anFO9kjcDcsV6xqsJ/story.html

http://reason.com/blog/2012/10/04/it-looks-like-cocaine-to-me

[snip]

She sometimes would take 15 to 25 [drug] samples and instead of testing them all, she would test only five of them, then list them all as positive. She said that sometimes, if a sample tested negative, she would take known cocaine from another sample and add it to the negative sample to make it test positive for cocaine....

One co-worker told state police he never saw Dookhan in front of a microscope. A lab employee saw Dookhan weighing drug samples without doing a balance check on her scale.

In an interview with state police late last month, Dookhan acknowledged faking test results for two to three years. She told police she identified some drug samples as narcotics simply by looking at them instead of testing them, a process known as dry labbing. She also said she forged the initials of colleagues and deliberately turned a negative sample into a positive for narcotics a few times.

Dookhan was arrested last week and charged with obstruction of justice for lying about test results and pretending to have a master's degree in chemistry. The Post says "co-workers began expressing concern about Dookhan's work habits several years ago, but her supervisors allowed her to continue working." According to Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley, "the only motive authorities have found so far is that Dookhan wanted to be seen as a good worker." CBS News reports that "Dookhan tested more than 60,000 drug samples involving 34,000 defendants during her nine years at the lab."



This is going to be a huge financial disaster for Massachusetts as not only were innocent people charged, some were sent to
prison. In other cases some real 'bad guys' are going to get out.
Oct 5, 2012 at 5:30 PM | Unregistered Commenterjohn
That is incredible John.
Oct 6, 2012 at 1:03 AM | Unregistered CommenterS. Gompers
John

Great story, I posted it earlier today, thanks.

Norman

Really enjoyed reading your comment. Thanks.
Oct 9, 2012 at 2:56 AM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
The least this woman could have done is the sniff test.
Oct 9, 2012 at 7:46 AM | Unregistered CommenterSKINFLINT
Should U.S. Government Pay Americans’ Drug Rehab Costs—If the Government Is Helping–Cartel(s) Import Illegal Drugs?

If The latest revelations are true, mentioned in the October 5, 2012 New American article “Stratfor Sources: U.S. Troops in Mexico as Feds Aid Cartels” that U.S. Government supports certain drug cartels as “first reported by Narco News”, after WikiLeaks released hacked e-mails from Stratfor, it would appear to confirm accusations made last year by a top Sinaloa operative Jesus Vicente Zambada-Niebla, that U.S. government offered his criminal syndicate virtual immunity to import multi-ton quantities of drugs across the border.

If U.S. government is helping the Sinaloa Cartel criminal racketeering enterprise or other Cartel import tons of drugs into the United States—Americans injured by those illegal drugs should not hesitate to file Civil Racketeering Lawsuits against the U.S. Government and the law enforcement agencies that participated in helping Cartels import illegal-drugs.

U.S. criminal courts order defendants as a condition of probation, to attend and pay for expensive private and non-profit drug rehab programs creating a $12-Billion dollar industry. If e.g. the Sinaloa Drug Cartel is the predominant importer of drugs into the United States because of U.S. Government support, shouldn’t the U.S. Government pay the drug rehabilitation costs of American drug users? It would appear Californians injured by a Cartel’s illegal-drugs that U.S. Government helped import into the United States, could sue U.S. Government and any law enforcement agency that assisted the Cartel import illegal-drugs under The California Drug Dealer Liability Act Effective January 1997. In brief the “Act” provides a civil remedy for damages to persons in a community injured as a result of the use of an illegal controlled substance. These persons include parents, employers, insurers, governmental entities, and others who pay for drug treatment or employee assistance programs, as well as infants injured as a result of exposure to controlled substances in utero (" drug babies"). This “Act” enables them to recover damages from those persons in the community who have joined the marketing of illegal controlled substances. A further purpose of this Act is to shift, to the extent possible, the cost of the damage caused by the existence of the market for illegal controlled substances in a community to those who illegally profit from that market.

Consequently if U.S. Government supports the Sinaloa Cartel or other Cartel that import illegal-drugs into California, victims of illegal-drug use should be able to sue the U.S. Government along with all other participants.

Every year innocent landlords of residential rental property and motels defend their property against Government Civil Asset Forfeiture because unbeknownst to an owner, a tenant or guest at their property is alleged by government to have sold or distributed illegal drugs. It is a conflict of interest for U.S. Government to forfeit real estate from innocent landlords if Government participates is supporting illegal-drug Cartel criminal enterprise to import illegal drugs into America—foreseeable to taint innocent landlords’ property.

Many U.S. Cities have blocks of blighted buildings caused by illegal drug activity that collapsed real estate values and collected property taxes communities depend on to support their infra structure. If U.S. Government is helping the Sinaloa Drug Cartel or other cartel flood America with illegal drugs, cities and counties economically damaged by U.S. Government’s illegal-drug activities should file Civil RICO Suits to recover damages from the U.S. Government and law enforcement agencies that helped a Drug Cartel import illegal drugs into the U.S. See California Drug Dealer Liability Act Effective January 1997, other states passed similar bills.

Illegal-drug distribution in America increasingly corrupts police. If U.S. Government actually offered or actually helped the Sinaloa Drug Cartel or other Cartel import illegal-drugs into the U.S as alleged in numerous reports, what kind of message is U.S. Government sending law enforcement. Almost every week the news reports police arrested for selling illegal drugs, taking bribes, falsifying evidence to arrest U.S. Citizens. Police corruption can only get worse if U.S. Government supports drug-Cartels import illegal-drugs into the United States.

See the October 5, 2012 New American Article at:
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/13118-stratfor-sources-us-troops-in-mexico-as-feds-aid-cartels
Oct 11, 2012 at 10:43 AM | Unregistered CommenterRwolf
http://www.sundance.org/projects/cartel-land
An interesting doc on the drug war vigilantes.
Apr 10, 2016 at 11:28 AM | Unregistered Commenterskinflint
Thank you for sharing. It is infuriating to hear about police being corrupted by this problem. I know they aren't all corrupt, but the number seems to be increasing.
Nov 3, 2016 at 4:40 PM | Unregistered CommenterDesmond Jones
Wild. Good write up. Terrifying stuff.
Dec 29, 2016 at 4:32 PM | Unregistered CommenterBrie
Guess someone from UVA likes fucking folks over...

http://content.law.virginia.edu/news/2012_fall/alumni_election.htm
Dec 29, 2016 at 5:13 PM | Registered CommenterJohn
For some reason, I'm not surprised about any of this. The government has a monopoly on drug violations so I'm sure there are people who monetarily gain off drugs and drug trasnportation.
Jan 26, 2017 at 9:37 AM | Unregistered CommenterJosh Larson
Federal agency makes it clear: Even legal marijuana users can’t buy guns


The ATF raises concerns about Second Amendment rights with a warning that pot is illegal under federal law and users of the drug, even in states where it is legal, can't buy guns.



http://www.centralmaine.com/2017/01/27/federal-agency-makes-it-clear-eve...





The new language, added last week to forms filled out by gun buyers in Maine and nationwide, has raised concerns that the government is unfairly denying cannabis users their Second Amendment right to bear arms. And it has renewed calls from medical and recreational marijuana advocates for a change in federal law to catch up with the country’s changing views on marijuana.



COURT UPHOLDS ATF’S POSITION

While the federal government has so far taken a hands-off approach to states that allow recreational or medicinal use of the drug, the new language on gun purchase forms is intended to send a clear message that the permissive attitude does not extend to gun ownership.

“It’s really a ‘Guys, we mean it’ kind of statement,” David Boyer, who managed the campaign to legalize recreational marijuana in Maine, said of the revision. “It is putting a lot of people in an uncomfortable position by either not letting them own a gun for hunting or self-defense, or lying so they can have a gun for protection or hunting.”

Form 4473 is updated every couple of years. The timing of the new warning on the form is not related to the transfer of power in Washington, D.C., although it comes as marijuana legalization advocates around the country watch to see if the Trump administration will take a more hostile approach to their movement.

The revision was intended to make it clear to individuals who are completing Form 4473 that federal law does not recognize the state issuance of medical marijuana cards, said Christopher Arone, a special agent and public information officer for the ATF Boston Field Division. The warning also applies to non-medicinal marijuana use by adults in states like Maine.
Jan 28, 2017 at 7:42 AM | Unregistered Commenterjohn
Seems like something out of Brave New World. But again, the people who allow this might be getting money out of it somehow.
Apr 27, 2017 at 9:29 AM | Unregistered CommenterJosh Seulgi
Very interesting read! https://www.woodyssmokeshop.com/
Jun 23, 2017 at 12:52 AM | Unregistered CommenterWoody's Smoke Shop

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.