Putin Says Goldman Sachs Behind Leak Of Panama Papers
Photo by William Banzai7
BLOOMBERG -- President Vladimir Putin acknowledged that information in the Panama Papers implicating people in his inner circle to offshore transactions was accurate, but dismissed the leak -- which he tied to Goldman Sachs Group Inc. -- as part of U.S. efforts to influence Russia’s upcoming elections.
“Odd as it may seem, they aren’t publishing false information on offshores,” Putin said during his annual call-in show Thursday. “They’re not accusing anyone of anything specific. They’re just casting a shadow.”
The documents show at least $2 billion in transactions involved people and companies that had ties to Putin, according to reports published this month by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists.
The Russian president said Goldman Sachs owns the parent of the German newspaper that received leaked files from Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca. The newspaper, Sueddeutsche Zeitung, is owned by a Munich publishing family and a German media group that has no corporate affiliations to Goldman Sachs, according to a statement from Stefan Hilscher, the managing director of the paper. The U.S. bank declined to comment.
In 2013, Goldman Sachs signed a three-year agreement to advise the Russian government on burnishing the nation’s image overseas and attracting more institutional investors.
Continue reading at Bloomberg...
---
UPDATE
Now, less than 24 hours later, the Kremlin has issued an apology and explanation for Putin's statement. Great Leader apparently got some bad information from one of his cronies.
Kremlin Backtracks On Goldman Sachs Statement
INVESTING IN RUSSIA IN 2016
Bloomberg analyst discussion from Thursday.
Reader Comments (31)
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-04-15/spanish-minister-jose-manuel-soria-resigns-over-panama-leaks
This just happened a few minutes ago.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-04-14/steve-cohen-has-a-new-firm-that-s-allowed-to-take-outside-money
After being busted by the SEC and banned from the industry.
Here you have Putin claiming that "Goldman Sachs owns the parent of the German newspaper that received leaked files from Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca."
That's about as black and white as it gets. It should be easy for Goldman to just flat-out deny (and, being Goldman, ridicule) Putin's claim as the product of muppet imagination. But instead...
"The U.S. bank declined to comment."
I can think of two reasons Goldman might have taken a pass. EITHER Goldman does own the newspaper, OR Goldman doesn't own the paper but lied to Russia by claiming at one time that it did. The latter possibility is left open by this interesting tidbit from the Bloomberg story:
"In 2013, Goldman Sachs signed a three-year agreement to advise the Russian government on burnishing the nation’s image overseas and attracting more institutional investors."
US-born Ukrainian finance minister may buy country's largest telecom company – reports
http://www.rt.com/business/339648-jaresko-ukraine-telecom-company/
Mikheil Saakashvili is back. Having left his native Georgia after voters repudiated his party and his term as president expired, Saakashvili has revived his political fortunes on a much larger playing field — Ukraine. The former Georgian president has taken Ukrainian citizenship and rapidly emerged as one of the country’s most popular political figures. And with good reason: he has bravado; he is a vast storehouse of energy; and he is tempting Ukrainians with an easy solution to poverty and corruption — namely, him.
http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/01/20/the-case-against-saakashvili-ukraine/
Why, that is simply OUTRAGEOUS! Goldman? Engage in sharp dealing?
"a former State Department employee, is reportedly looking to purchase a company that controls 85 percent of Ukraine's telecom market"
Ugh. No, I hadn't seen any of that.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-04-15/goldman-s-blankfein-said-to-demand-deepest-cost-cuts-in-years
"Blankfein’s reliance on junior bankers has helped contain costs. From 2012 through last year, the number of partners and managing directors decreased 2 percent, while the ranks of analysts, associates and vice presidents increased 17 percent, Blankfein said in the February presentation. Even as its workforce grew 11 percent, the company cut $270 million in compensation, the presentation shows."
It would seem that the current depression continues to munch its way upward, spitting out the elite's countless pretenders in the process. I wonder if Blankfein knows that he's expendable himself--that his status, much like that of a toilet scrubber, hinges on how efficiently he carries out instructions? Or does he really believe his own b.s. about creating jobs and doing God's work and all that?
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/04/15/kremlin-backtracks-on-goldman-sachs-accusation.html
UPDATE
It looks like Putin got bad information from one of his aides.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/04/14/usda-plans-to-bail-out-wild-blueberries.html
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/04/14/a-push-to-create-the-next-great-american-marijuana-town.html
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/04/14/us-consumer-price-index-march-2016.html
Deflation is the much greater worry at this point.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/04/14/stock-rally-is-a-little-extended-jeff-saut.html
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/04/14/russia-unveils-cost-of-keeping-lenin-on-display.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/16/world/middleeast/saudi-arabia-warns-ofeconomic-fallout-if-congress-passes-9-11-bill.html?_r=0
http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/apr/01/hsbc-reform-too-slow-says-report
http://ourfuture.org/20160413/wall-streets-fraud-of-the-week-club
http://www.businessinsider.com/ap-saudi-land-purchases-fuel-debate-over-us-water-rights-2016-3
America has hammers to deal with threats. 15 of 19 9-11 terrorists were Saudi, follow the money, this is something no one wants to do.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-22/u-s-is-hiding-treasury-bond-data-that-s-suddenly-become-crucial
http://www.newstatesman.com/global-issues/2011/03/land-queen-world-australia
"One candidate was paid six-figure sums to give speeches at Goldman Sachs. Another received a Goldman Sachs loan for his Senate campaign and is married to one of its executives."
The writer, of course, is talking about Hillary (who got $675,000 for 3 speeches at Goldman) and Ted Cruz (who got a $1 million loan from Goldman, which HE ILLEGALLY FAILED TO DISCLOSE IN HIS FEDERAL ELECTION FILINGS).
My guess is that the writer left these details out since the article was about Wall Street fraud and he didn't want to distract readers with election-related tidbits. And the piece does make strong cases against both GS and Wells Fargo for fraud.
Interestingly, though, both cases for fraud are grounded in nondisclosure of material information. So aside from taking dirty money, Hillary and Lyin' Ted are also guilty of replicating the very behavior by Goldman that makes its money dirty (read: stolen) in the first place. Hillary is hiding the quid pro quo for the $675,000 by concealing the speech transcripts. Ted got caught lying--by material nondisclosure of the $1MM loan--on his election forms.
Given that, what do you think the odds are that either Hillary or Ted will see to it that Wall Street is prosecuted for ANY future crimes? Exactly, zero.
Of course, the mainstream media and really big alternative media (is there a difference at this point?) don't cover ANY of this.
I won't count on this happening during my lifetime.
Gompers and Cheyene, count me in on that zero no chance in hell. Wall Street owns them both.
Welcome back! Fraud, did someone say something about fraud. Here's that WSJ piece you mentioned on HSBC and the shrimp farmer.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/hsbc-struggles-to-bring-money-laundering-vigilance-up-to-snuff-1459279408
Iranian Miniskirts, Bags of Cash Raise Doubts Over Controls at HSBC
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-22/u-s-is-hiding-treasury-bond-data-that-s-suddenly-become-crucial
---
Great find Gomp, I had not seen this detail before.
And yes, it is good to see Sagebrush.