New York Fed President William Dudley On Bernanke's Reappointment, MBS Purchases, Inflation & Quantitative Easing
CNBC's Steve Liesman had a 2-part interview (lovefest) this morning with New York Federal Reserve President William Dudley. Dudley came to the New York Fed from Goldman Sachs, and his appointment to Treasury Secretary Geithner's previous position was incestuous and controversial, as detailed recently in the WSJ. Even the reigning king of corporate cronyism, GE's Jeff Immelt (a NY Fed board member), was said to be unnerved by the appointment.
Warning: watching this clip will likely cause unrelenting indigestion.
Part 1 (4:27)
Part 2 (4:42)
Fears of inflation because of the Federal Reserve's massive quantitative easing measures are overblown, because the Fed has the ability to pull the liquidity out of the market fast enough to prevent price rises, William Dudley, New York Fed president, told CNBC Monday.
Since the onset of the financial crisis, the Fed has cut interest rates near zero and injected about $1 trillion in the markets to prevent credit from freezing up. Many analysts have warned the measures carry a high risk of inflation and on Monday a survey of economists in the National Association for Business Economics showed that 41 percent of them believed the measures to be inflationary.
"My view is that we have tools to manage our balance sheet so that we'll not have an inflation outcome," Dudley told CNBC. "We're far along in terms of having the interest on excess reserves and, just in case, developing other means of pulling out the excess reserves."
"Some of the exit strategies are already happening," Dudley said, explaining that lots of liquidity facilities were introduced with penalty interest rates and as the economy is recovering, firms return the liquidity to escape the punishment of high rates.
The Fed is also looking into the idea of banks depositing excess reserves with the Fed on a term basis, and into that of launching repo operations – selling securities to the market and withdrawing liquidity that way, Dudley said.
But he said it was too early to speak about launching the exit strategy, as the economy still isn't growing fast and unemployment is high.
"My own personal view is, I think it's a little premature to be so confident that you want to pull all these things back right now," Dudley said.
"I'm totally committed to taking away the punch bowl at the right time," he said during the same interview.
It is possible that inflation could decline for a while because of the slack in economy and the banking system will take time to heal itself, Dudley added.
Reader Comments (14)
http://www.cnbc.com/id/32624655
There's no chance of this ending badly
http://www.eschatonblog.com/2009/08/wheeeeeeeeeeeeee.html
Rep. Ron Paul said he has a commitment from the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, Barney Frank, to advance the Texas Republican's legislation opening the Federal Reserve to broader federal audits.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125167261849670795.html
Oh, and did he just let the cat out of the bag that essentially the Fed is loaning money to the banks so they can prop up the Treasury market (3:10)? And this, like paying interest on those reserves, isn't "a subsidy to the banking system" as Steve Liesman asks?
It's ALL a freakin' subsidy to the banking system -- we've re-engineered our entire monetary and fiscal policy so that it helps out individual (large) banks. Tough stuff if you're a small, community bank -- no one is going to bail out your Fannie and Freddie shares, but the bondholders -- they get whatever they want. Plus, the govt isn't going to give you taxpayer money and call you "well capitalized," thereby reducing your FDIC assessment.
http://www.quantcast.com/dailybail.com?userView=Public
Keep up the great showing, Steve!
http://letthemfail.us/archives/1884
Bring on the Amero. By then, they'll have another name for sovereign default because "sovereign" simply will no longer apply.
-WM
I think everyone can see, except Gobias, that the ENTIRE Government is only interested in saving those who got us into this mess to begin with. As “they” are where the campaign contributions come from...
Prepare to “go to ground”, as things are poised to get ugly, because only the “poor, innocent, rich criminals, matter to our Government. You must trust yourselves not your leaders, you see who they represent.
Good post AB.
Good point on sovereignity Wil, this has been a long term Goal of the "in" crowd for generations. They will "create" the "problem" to make their "solution ","palatable".
"We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office."
Aesop
http://letthemfail.us/archives/1884
Wil.
At 2:15 of the clip Dudley admits the Fed is monetizing the debt...listen for yourself and there is the proof it's happening.
Is this the part where he says "We, might actually make money"? I was confused by that -- did he mean the banks, or did he mean FRBNY or what? I thought he meant that the banks were borrowing at next to zero and buying treasuries, but are you suggesting that the Fed is simply buying Treasuries outright (i.e. monetizing the debt)? I'll admit to being a newbie on the workings of the Federal Reserve system.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1233197344&play=1
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1233243210&play=1
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1233316264&play=1
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1233344749&play=1
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1235276396&play=1
The problem is that we have no idea how much exactly they are purchasing in this manner...at least Dudley admitted its happening...
Bill Dud. -- I don't think it was monetizing the debt... to any significant degree... We were trying to ease financial conditions.
This has all the reassurance of someone saying, "No, I wouldn't say I'm still smoking crack...to any significant degree... I'm just trying to ease some symptoms I've been having."
FAQs: Purchasing Direct Obligations of Housing-Related GSEs
http://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/gses_faq.html
"What type of GSE direct obligations will the Federal Reserve purchase under the program?
The Federal Reserve purchases fixed-rate, non-callable, senior benchmark securities issued by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banks. Prior to August 31, 2009, purchases were focused on off-the-run securities in that category. Going forward, purchases will include on-the-run securities in that category."
What's new here is that the securities purchased will be NEW issues rather than ones already sold into the market. Ostensibly there are technical reasons for doing this, but this is monetization nonetheless.
(ht: everyone's favorite purveyor of edgy caps and t-shirts)
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/fed-will-now-monetize-most-recently-issued-agencies