Quantcast
Feeds: Email, RSS & Twitter

Get Our Videos By Email

 

8,300 Unique Visitors In The Past Day

 

Powered by Squarespace

 

Search The Archive Of 15,000 Videos

SEARCH THE DAILY BAIL

 

 

Hank Paulson Is A Criminal - Pass It On

"The Federal Reserve Is A Ponzi Scheme"


Get Our Videos By Email

THE FED UNDER FIRE: Must See Clip

Bernanke's Replacement: Happy Hour In Santa Cruz

Must See: National Debt Road Trip

"Of Course We're Not Going To  Payback the Chinese."

Dave Chappelle On White Collar Crime

Carlin: Wall Street Owns Washington

SLIDESHOW - Genius Signs From Irish IMF Protest

SLIDESHOW - Airport Security Cartoons - TSA

Most Recent Comments
Cartoons & Photos
SEARCH
« BOMBSHELL REPORT: Hillary Clinton's Email Hacked By Russia, Kremlin War Erupts Over Whether To Release 20,000 Stolen Emails | Main | When You Owe $20 Trillion, It's The Interest That'll Kill You »
Tuesday
May102016

Judicial Watch President Updates Clinton Email Case

COURT AGREES WITH JUDICIAL WATCH

President Tom Fitton on the latest in the FOIA battle for Hillary's emails. Judicial Watch had another victory last week in the courts, as Fitton writes in an editorial published today. This case is separate from the FBI investigation, and is one of two cases Judicial Watch has before the courts, both related to Hillary's email server.

Here's the Judicial Watch op-ed:

State Department Hid Key Clinton Email from Judicial Watch

 

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (15)

LOOK OUT HUMA: Hillary's Top Aides Ordered To Give Depositions In Email Case

http://dailybail.com/home/look-out-huma-hillarys-top-aides-ordered-to-give-depositions.html
May 4, 2016 at 4:12 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
18 usc 2071 Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; AND SHALL FORFEIT HIS OFFICE AND BE DISQUALIFIED FROM HOLDING ANY OFFICE UNDER THE UNITED STATES!

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2071
May 4, 2016 at 5:58 PM | Unregistered Commenterdesertspeaks
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/local_coverage/2016/05/scott_brown_mitt_romney_thinks_trump_will_beat_clinton

Tonight at 11 Brown will be interviewed and the VP possibility will be brought up.
May 4, 2016 at 7:33 PM | Unregistered Commenterjohn
Scott Brown wonders if Elizabeth Warren is ‘drunk tweeting’

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2016/05/04/scott-brown-elizabeth-warren-tweeting
May 4, 2016 at 7:35 PM | Unregistered Commenterjohn
US judge says Clintom may have to testify in Email matter

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0XV2RT
May 4, 2016 at 8:14 PM | Unregistered Commenterjohn
Ruh-roh.

"In the process of mining data from the Blumenthal account, Lazar [aka Guccifer] said he came across evidence that others were on the Clinton server."

"'As far as I remember, yes, there were … up to 10, like, IPs from other parts of the world,' he said."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/05/04/romanian-hacker-guccifer-breached-clinton-server-it-was-easy.html
May 4, 2016 at 8:42 PM | Unregistered CommenterCheyenne
Cheyenne, here is the Guccifer protective order.

http://cryptome.org/2016/04/lazar-guccifer-018-019.pdf
May 4, 2016 at 8:48 PM | Unregistered Commenterjohn
Jesus, john, Trump would have to be out of his fucking mind to tap the bailout-loving kneepad-wearing bankster whore known as Scott Brown as his running mate imo. I mean, why not just paint a target on your back?

The career criminals on Wall Street LOVE Brown and HATE Trump. The assassin's math here is a slam dunk even for a midget like Rubio.

I'd take just about ANY of the 21 other names on this list of potential veeps...

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article75500237.html
May 4, 2016 at 8:54 PM | Unregistered CommenterCheyenne
Dude, did you LOOK at that protective order?! I did a double-take and stopped reading when I saw THIS in the case caption:

"Trial: September 12, 2016"

You know how fucking insane that would be? Holy shit! A cult rock-star criminal defendant offering testimony in open court that could criminally implicate a presidential candidate who's standing for election in 2 months?! If Tom Clancy or John Grisham wrote that script it would be rejected as too far-out.

There is NO WAY that trial goes forward as scheduled.
May 4, 2016 at 9:01 PM | Unregistered CommenterCheyenne
Yeah, this is a big story. Drudge has it as his Big headline.. The Clinton camp is freaking out. This reads NOTHING like their typical denial of a story. They are panicked.

"In response to Lazar’s claims, the Clinton campaign issued a statement Wednesday night saying, "There is absolutely no basis to believe the claims made by this criminal from his prison cell. In addition to the fact he offers no proof to support his claims, his descriptions of Secretary Clinton's server are inaccurate. It is unfathomable that he would have gained access to her emails and not leaked them the way he did to his other victims.”"
May 4, 2016 at 9:51 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
"The Clinton camp is freaking out. This reads NOTHING like their typical denial of a story. They are panicked."

I kind of got the same feeling. Just the fact that someone could have hacked her account in the way he described looks bad. Team Tump will have fun with this, I'm sure.
May 4, 2016 at 10:05 PM | Unregistered Commenterpitchfork
Words like 'unfathomable' will usually only appear in a denial when it is in fact, quite fathomable. This is a dead giveaway that they are worried.
May 4, 2016 at 10:25 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Good eye, fellas. Clinton's defense does reek of panic. How ridiculous is this one? "He offers no proof."

No shit. He's in fucking JAIL. Where's he supposed to stow his trove of proof?
May 4, 2016 at 10:47 PM | Registered CommenterCheyenne
AND he's in a "prison cell," so you know he's not credible. There were discussions on including that language -- you don't just throw that out there unless you've had discussions about "how do we respond to this?". If it's just some Romanian nutjob in a prison cell, you ignore it or simply say the accusations have no basis. You don't go out of your way to discredit a Romanian nutjob hacker sitting in a prison cell, unless you're rattled. That's my read, anyway.
May 4, 2016 at 10:53 PM | Unregistered Commenterpitchfork
Federal judge opens the door to Clinton deposition in email case

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/278702-judge-leaves-open-door-for-clinton-deposition-in-email-probe

This ruling happened Wednesday.
May 5, 2016 at 4:20 AM | Registered CommenterDailyBail

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.