Quantcast
Feeds: Email, RSS & Twitter

Get Our Videos By Email

 

8,300 Unique Visitors In The Past Day

 

Powered by Squarespace

 

Search The Archive Of 15,000 Videos

SEARCH THE DAILY BAIL

 

 

Hank Paulson Is A Criminal - Pass It On

"The Federal Reserve Is A Ponzi Scheme"


Get Our Videos By Email

THE FED UNDER FIRE: Must See Clip

Bernanke's Replacement: Happy Hour In Santa Cruz

Must See: National Debt Road Trip

"Of Course We're Not Going To  Payback the Chinese."

Dave Chappelle On White Collar Crime

Carlin: Wall Street Owns Washington

SLIDESHOW - Genius Signs From Irish IMF Protest

SLIDESHOW - Airport Security Cartoons - TSA

Most Recent Comments
Cartoons & Photos
SEARCH
« NY Attorney General Facing Intense Pressure From Obama Administration On Bank Foreclosure Fraud Deal: "Wall Street Is Our Main Street And We Have To Make Sure We Are Doing Everything We Can To SUPPORT Them" | Main | Giuliani Tells Don Imus: 'I Wouldn't Lock Up Jamie Dimon, Huge Wall Street Bonuses Are Wonderful, They Helped Me Balance My Bloated Budget' »
Tuesday
Sep062011

FHFA Lawsuit Supporter Rep. Brad Miller: "Not Suing Big Banks Over Fraudulent Mortgages Would Be Tantamount To A Second Bailout"

WSJ

A federal housing regulator’s lawsuits against large financial institutions seeking billions of damages in mortgage investments that led to losses for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac has sparked a debate over whether regulators are now too zealously attacking banks.

The 17 lawsuits, which are seeking unspecified damages on $196 billion in mortgage-backed securities that Fannie and Freddie bought during the housing bubble, illustrate the tension facing regulators over their response to the financial crisis.

On the one hand, regulators have tried to restore lending in order to get the economy moving. But they are also charged with protecting taxpayers and recouping recoverable losses that have stemmed from the massive bailouts of 2008. The central tension, it seems, is this: Should potential misdeeds by banks and other firms be excused because the banking sector is too important to the broader economy, or because Fannie and Freddie knew what they were doing?

A number of analysts made that point on Tuesday. Fannie, Freddie and their regulator “are acting in their own self interest as opposed to that of the broader U.S. economy,” wrote FBR Capital Markets analyst Paul Miller in a note to clients Tuesday. A hefty settlement for any damages will pull away capital from the banking system and cause banks “to overly tighten credit standards, which pushes potential homebuyers onto the sidelines,” Miller said.

The FHFA fired back in a statement on Tuesday: "The nation’s financial system cannot function if sellers of securities fail to fulfill a legal responsibility to accurately represent the characteristics of certain investments."

It continued:

Some have claimed that these suits will disrupt economic recovery, or endanger the targeted banks, or increase their cost of capital. While everyone is concerned with these important issues, the long-term stability and resilience of the nation’s financial system depends on investors being able to trust that the securities sold in this country adhere to applicable laws.

Though banks have argued that Fannie and Freddie were large and sophisticated buyers of mortgage securities, the FHFA noted that “the actual mortgages backing many of the securities had characteristics that differed in a material way from what had been represented in securities filings.”

In a conference call with reporters on Tuesday, Rep. Brad Miller (D., N.C.) argued that 'not pursuing lawsuits against the financial industry for issuing shady mortgage securities would be tantamount to another bailout.'

  • “I do not want them to look the other way and let taxpayers, once again, subsidize that industry,” he said. “Not pursuing a legitimate claim would be a subsidy.”

---

From the FHFA release, comes more color on the size of the final settlement:

  • At this time, it would be premature and potentially misleading to estimate the size of any potential recoveries. However, press reports that FHFA is seeking nearly $200 billion in damages or recoveries are excessive; such numbers reflect the original amount of such securities purchased, not the losses incurred or the potential recoveries at the end of this process. In particular, use of original unpaid principal balance as a measure of potential recoveries is incorrect as it does not equate with the losses incurred and it does not reflect the repayments of principal that have already occurred or the remaining value of the securities.

 

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (5)

"Fraud As a Business Model"
Janet Tavakoli.President, Tavakoli Structured Finance

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/janet-tavakoli/fraud-as-a-business-model_b_950806.html?ref=tw
Sep 7, 2011 at 8:19 AM | Unregistered Commenterjohn
Thank John.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/07/ge-lawsuit-general-electric-mortgage_n_951963.html

General Electric Plans To 'Vigorously Contest' Mortgage-Backed Securities Lawsuit from FHFA
Sep 7, 2011 at 11:32 AM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
I agree it is bad to pull the money out of the banks which are already weak. But we have to hold the bank leadership accountable. Therefore let us do some things which do not pull money out of the banks. For starters, if the banks are still that weak, despite the bailout, the leadership must be incompetent. Therefore bring their salaries in line with those imposed on UAW workers. That would have the additional benefit of bringing money back into banks instead of taking it away. Next, criminal prosecution. If we assume the bank leadership is competent and their immense salaries and bonuses justified, then they knew what they were doing when they sold bad investments to pension funds and set up robo signing operations. If they knew what they were doing then they had fraudulent intent. Therefore they are criminals, send them to jail.
Sep 7, 2011 at 2:38 PM | Unregistered CommenterHarry Johnson
I agree it is bad to pull the money out of the banks which are already weak.

---

I don't agree Harry. Why not pull your money out of the fraudulent TBTF banks and contribute to their collapse. We don't need them. They are a scourge. Put your money in US Bancorp or PNC Financial, or even better, a local credit union.
Sep 7, 2011 at 2:59 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.