Quantcast
Feeds: Email, RSS & Twitter

Get Our Videos By Email

 

8,300 Unique Visitors In The Past Day

 

Powered by Squarespace

 

Most Recent Comments
Cartoons & Photos
SEARCH
« Geithner: "I Never Had A Real Job" (VIDEO) | Main | GOTCHA: Carl Paladino Is A Racist: Tea Party NY Gov Candidate's E-Mails Exposed -- Racism, Porn, Bestiality »
Monday
Apr122010

EXPOSED: 'Crash The Tea Party' Infiltration Effort

Considering our previous story, I reserve equal anger for these bastards.

Check out the Keith Olbermann ass-kiss the founder has on his twitter page.

Feel free to trash this tool's Twitter account.

 

 

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (135)

I must be close, next page....
Apr 17, 2010 at 5:58 PM | Unregistered CommenterZarathustra
Can I get a what what!!!!!
Apr 17, 2010 at 5:58 PM | Unregistered CommenterZarathustra
Excellent posts, none of them.
Apr 17, 2010 at 11:05 PM | Unregistered CommenterRecoverylessRecovery
Zed's Dead, Baby. Zed's Dead.
Apr 18, 2010 at 12:05 AM | Unregistered CommenterZarathustra
Looks like Zara is going for the world record; FOUR full pages of INANE commentary!
Apr 18, 2010 at 4:25 AM | Unregistered CommenterRecoverylessRecovery
@DB

I understand YOU to be more or less in agreement with the original intentions & motives of the ORIGINAL Tea Partyers, comprised mostly (back then at least) by those who wished mainly a return to constitutional rule of law and lesser government. MINIMAL government, in fact. (and PLEASE do correct me if I'm wrong)

In that vein, I'd like to ask you; how many of the regulars here would you say belong to that SAME school of thought vs the "Latter-Day" Partyers?

By "latter day partyers" I mean that largely geriatric movement, ideologically confused to the point of incoherency, and based on anger, ignorance and fear?
Apr 18, 2010 at 4:48 AM | Unregistered CommenterRecoverylessRecovery
RLR i owe you .I didnt realize you were a pro little troll feeding on the emotions people who care .Does it make your little wee
wee stand at attention when you get someone upset .I would say it does .Better watch it you will go Blind.
Oh well i am sure you impress yourself witch is good that keeps you away from real trouble like yelling
at old ladies.
Apr 21, 2010 at 5:19 PM | Unregistered CommenterJTS
Oh brother.
Apr 21, 2010 at 10:05 PM | Unregistered CommenterZarathustra
My apologies to the regulars...i stepped away last week to get my head checked out literally...i've been getting headaches every day for months presumably from staring at a monitor for 12-14 hours every day...the good news is nothing was found and the headaches have stopped...i have some new specs and some eye exercises to do regulary to avoid strain...

i have been following the goldman, sec, abacus story as well as the reform trail....

i will begin posting as usual tonight...i have not read any comments or emails since last week...i will get to everything...

again, my apologies and i hope everyone is well...

steve
Apr 22, 2010 at 11:02 AM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Glad your back DB, Hope all is well with you.
Apr 22, 2010 at 1:14 PM | Unregistered CommenterSagebrush
Good to see you back, quit worrying us like that, 2 MIA's in 2 months.
Apr 22, 2010 at 3:13 PM | Unregistered CommenterS. Gompers
I thought you got too close to the Kellermann investigation, good to see that you are safe.
Apr 22, 2010 at 3:48 PM | Unregistered CommenterZarathustra
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ea9JVnck_-E

Some want the truth out in the open, others want to help hide the truth like Huffington.
Apr 22, 2010 at 5:20 PM | Unregistered CommenterZarathustra
I found DB...no, not in Tahoe...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjhgTnfLFEw&feature=ytn%253Amptnews&playnext_from=TL&videos=tOt2dsT7yhY&playnext=1

this was funny...

i know i've said this before...but simply to remove confusion, RLR is NOT the same commenter as AB...it might be nice if that accusation stopped so that at least one point of contention might be eliminated...

their IP addresses are from different states...

-----------

mark and james h...give me a link to the tea party pitchfork group...thanks...
Apr 26, 2010 at 1:28 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Welcome back, Steve. Yeah, about that tea party group Mark and I were forming....um, I think I need to run out for some silly string, first. Will keep you updated.

Silly string, notwithstanding, I was/am serious about this. Even just having a web presence will give us legitimacy to speak AS Tea Party-ers on whatever occasion might come up. It's a brand name that's out there and well-known. Most MSM morons don't realize that there are thousands of bank bailout aficionados out there, just itchin' to crack some banskter heads. Being a Tea Party group might help us get the message out.

Seriously, if push comes to shove, maybe I'll just start drafting Daily Bailers and making them part of the group ;-)
Apr 26, 2010 at 2:47 PM | Unregistered CommenterJames H
Think I'll start a cocktail party, because this is definitely NOT my cup-a-tea.
Apr 26, 2010 at 5:57 PM | Unregistered Commenterboerenbedrog
JTS is not the same IP address neither...
Apr 26, 2010 at 6:39 PM | Unregistered CommenterS. Gompers
JTS is not the same IP address either...

-------------

correct...i wasn't aware that anyone had accused JTS...
Apr 26, 2010 at 7:37 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Time to move up a level on the thinking scale.
Apr 26, 2010 at 8:32 PM | Unregistered CommenterZarathustra
All right, maybe I can cave in on the silly string, but not a coherent agenda.
Apr 26, 2010 at 8:38 PM | Unregistered Commentermark mchugh
Mark (if you want to take this to another, SHORTER thread, that would be fine by me),

Nah, we can still do silly string. Esp. if Mr. Funny Money is going to be around. But what are you getting at about the "coherent agenda"? It's the Daily Bail agenda, which is the Tea Party agenda (ostensibly), PLUS actual knowledge about banking and finance, MINUS racism, Bush/Palin worship, torture, etc. Seems pretty simple to me. Again, you should check out some of the smaller tea party groups like Bowling Green, KY or Burlington, VT. They're pretty much focused on fiscal responsibility, small govt. and freedom.
Apr 26, 2010 at 8:55 PM | Unregistered CommenterJames H
Or were you just busting my balls?
Apr 26, 2010 at 8:56 PM | Unregistered CommenterJames H
Not at all, James.

What I meant was, "What is the most important thing? What needs to happen first?"

Suggestions:

Bernanke - Gone?
Geithner - Gone?
End Fannie, Freddie?
Debt ceiling cap?
re-instate Glass-Steagall?
Pull the FDIC backstop from GE?
Break up AIG & Citi?


Baby steps. Rather than be generally pissed-off, select achieveable goals, make demands on incumbents, and vote out anyone who fails to comply. What was great about the anti-Bernanke campaign we ran around here is we got a nice list of Senators who are NOT on our side.

I'm not that interested in ideology.

Here's a thought (I've been meaning to write about this). Elizabeth Coleman, the cross-addicted Inspector General for the Federal Reserve System, who slurred her way through an examination by Alan Grayson last year, proving beyond any doubt that she doesn't know her ass from her elbow. She still has her job, James. Let's get her fired. And let's document how long it took each and every member of congress to respond to that demand and what their official response was. We'll find out who wants to keep their job real fast.

If we could get that sack of shit fired; as small an achievment as that is, we will have accomplished more than all the other "tea party" factions combined thusfar. That's the kind of stuff I want to be part of and that's what I meant by "coherent agenda."

Then we silly-string her ass.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXlxBeAvsB8
Apr 26, 2010 at 10:32 PM | Unregistered Commentermark mchugh
And now that I'm wound up.....

I've noticed that "no handouts" and "no free lunch" are recurrent themes of the so-called tea-partiers. Cool. But I never hear them complaining very loud about the government's MASSIVE intervention in the mortgage market, which keeps their house prices from truly cratering. A 1% increase in interest rate equals about an 11% increase in monthly payment. Considering that the government is responsible for 95% of all new mortgages and rates are being artificially held more than 3 points below historic norms - that's one hell of a free lunch!

I wonder how many of those sign-toting ideologues (who are actually welfare cases themselves) would pay off mortgages that would net them hundreds of thousands in losses?
Apr 26, 2010 at 11:25 PM | Unregistered Commentermark mchugh
"The fact is that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have gotten too big and too expensive to the taxpayers." --Sarah Palin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZJbrHof6rs Michele Bachmann
Apr 26, 2010 at 11:49 PM | Unregistered CommenterZarathustra
I coulldn't agree more....

Here's something I want to know. When Geithner made those guarantees, all Fannie and Freddie debt should have been added to the national debt. Does anyone know if they have been?

Shouldn't adding that debt have required and immediate and massive raising of the debt ceiling?

I've poked around a little, but can't find a straight answer as to how the government is treating the Fannie/Freddie debt. Does anyone know?......Bueller.....
Apr 27, 2010 at 12:13 AM | Unregistered Commentermark mchugh
Here's something I want to know. When Geithner made those guarantees, all Fannie and Freddie debt should have been added to the national debt. Does anyone know if they have been?

------

they haven't been added to the totals...and they won't be under obankster...probably won't be added under any president...i have an overall rss alert for fannie & freddie and debt & deficit stories and there has been nothing...they remain off-balance sheet entities...
Apr 27, 2010 at 12:23 AM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
If we could get that sack of shit fired; as small an achievment as that is, we will have accomplished more than all the other "tea party" factions combined thusfar. That's the kind of stuff I want to be part of and that's what I meant by "coherent agenda."

-------------

great agenda mark..i think along the same lines...concrete, positive steps that are potentially achievable...several nights in the past year while trying to fall asleep, i've thought of ways to organize and rid ourselves of liz coleman...so i enjoyed your comment...we can accomplish goals of this sort...i liked your list...

Bernanke - Gone?...no comment...

Geithner - Gone?...he will leave after the fall elctions...probaly head to goldman...

End Fannie, Freddie?...yes, please....

Debt ceiling cap?...keeps going higher...

re-instate Glass-Steagall?...no f*cking way that will happen even though i agree with you...

Pull the FDIC backstop from GE?...that would be a fun campaign to wage...fox and cnn biz news would cover any movement against cnbc/ge...i have a contact at fox whose goal in life is to urinate on cnbc...

Break up AIG & Citi?...sing me up but out of our league...

----------


organization is the way to go...trying to work with blodget, barry rithotz, yves smith, mish, calculated risk, zero hedge and others to push an achievable agenda seems to me to be the best course of action in a general sense...

everyone except blodget might be willing to take a stand and demand that liz coleman be fired for example...
Apr 27, 2010 at 12:31 AM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
mark, do you mean debt (as in money they owe bondholders) or do you mean their potential obligations/liabilities?

As far as I understand it, their losses are off-budget and their total potential obligations are off-balance sheet. Their a massive SIV in essence. I guess that makes Geithner CEO of Citi after all.
Apr 27, 2010 at 12:31 AM | Unregistered CommenterJames H
Thanks for the info, DB (depressing as it was). Dealing with these evil twins should be front and center in any debate. And honestly, I'm not sure what should be done.
Apr 27, 2010 at 12:49 AM | Unregistered Commentermark mchugh
And honestly, I'm not sure what should be done.

---------

i think we need to figure out a way to limit future liabilities...we're stuck with what they own now...but instead of pressuring both to purchase/originate more mortgages of dubious quality, they should be would down and then shut down...in an appropriate timeline...
Apr 27, 2010 at 1:00 AM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
James,

I'm not really sure what I mean. There's going to be losses and liabilities. If you're credit was maxed, you wouldn't be allowed to co-sign a loan for somebody else. Shouldn't some portion of those liabilities be accounted for? somehow?

Allowing people to guarantee things that are completely unprepared to make good on seems like a really bad idea....
Apr 27, 2010 at 1:05 AM | Unregistered Commentermark mchugh
mark, Steve answered your question (while i was still fooling around typing and butchering the English language), but let's just put it this way: They're still lying.
Apr 27, 2010 at 1:29 AM | Unregistered CommenterJames H
Way to go "Crash the Tea Party"......instead of being a team player and a fellow citizen who's interests are to unite people against common causes, you are out there dividing us. I hope someone like the "Anonymous" group CRASHES your little party.
Jan 23, 2013 at 12:54 PM | Unregistered CommenterFreeman1776

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.