Elizabeth Warren On TARP & The Auto Bailouts (Bloomberg, Sep. 9)
TARP COP and Harvard Professor, Dr. Elizabeth Warren sat down with Bloomberg this afternoon to discuss the status of taxpayer investments in bailed-out auto manufacturers Chrysler and GM. Warren, who chairs the Congressional Oversight Panel, made news earlier Wednesday with the release of September's report, TARP Funds In The Auto Industry.
Treasury Tough Negotiator, but Unlikely to Recover Full Investment
Recommends Placing Chrysler, GM Shares in Independent Trust
WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Congressional Oversight Panel today released its September oversight report, "The Use of TARP Funds in Support and Reorganization of the Domestic Automotive Industry." In protecting the interests of taxpayers, the Panel found Treasury negotiated aggressively with all the players in the automotive industry. While Treasury has conceded that it is unlikely to recover the entire amount invested, other goals also influenced Treasury's overall strategy.
Even before last year's financial crisis, the American automotive industry was facing severe strains. In 2008, U.S. automotive sales fell to a 26-year low. By the end of the year, a long-term slump became an acute crisis, with Chrysler and General Motors (GM) unable to secure credit and facing reduced consumer demand. Without new financing, they faced collapse, a potentially crippling blow to the American economy that could eliminate nearly 1.1 million jobs. Facing this prospect, the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) was used to provide American automotive companies with short-term financing and additional loans to finance the bankruptcy reorganizations of Chrysler and GM.
American taxpayers now own 10 percent and 61 percent of the new Chrysler and GM companies respectively. Treasury's support for the automotive industry differed significantly from its assistance to the banking industry. The bulk of the funds were available only after the companies had filed for bankruptcy, wiping out their old shareholders, cutting their labor costs, reducing their debt obligations and replacing some top management. The government's role raises serious oversight issues, particularly Treasury's conflict between competing objectives.
The Panel recommends that, to mitigate the potential conflicts and political issues inherent in owning Chrysler and GM shares, Treasury should take exceptional care to explain its decision making and provide a full, transparent picture of its actions. The Panel also recommends that Treasury consider placing its GM and Chrysler shares in an independent trust that would be insulated from political pressure and government interference.
Given the questions about whether Treasury had the authority to use of TARP funds to aid the ailing domestic automotive industry, Treasury should provide a legal analysis justifying this decision. The Panel found that further questions about the propriety of the bankruptcy proceedings--accusations of illegal behavior and allegations that statutory bankruptcy priorities were overturned--are overblown and inaccurate.
The Congressional Oversight Panel was created to oversee the expenditure of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) funds authorized by Congress in the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA) and to provide recommendations on regulatory reform. The Panel members are: former Securities and Exchange Commissioner Paul S. Atkins, Congressman Jeb Hensarling (R-TX), Richard H. Neiman, Superintendent of Banks for the State of New York, Damon Silvers, Associate General Counsel of the AFL-CIO and Elizabeth Warren, Leo Gottlieb Professor of Law at Harvard Law School.
Reader Comments (5)
http://www.nydailynews.com/money/2009/09/09/2009-09-09_taxpayers_face_losses_on_significant_part_of_81b_auto_bailout.html#ixzz0QfhyCWVn
http://cop.senate.gov/reports/library/report-090909-cop.cfm
COP Field Hearing on the Auto Industry
http://cop.senate.gov/hearings/library/hearing-072709-detroithearing.cfm
http://dailybail.com/display/Search?searchQuery=elizabeth+warren&moduleId=4521698
Some of people's concerns have grown out of bogus claims spread by those whose only agenda is to kill reform at any cost. The best example is the claim made not just by radio and cable talk show hosts, but by prominent politicians, that we plan to set up panels of bureaucrats with the power to kill off senior citizens. Now, such a charge would be laughable if it weren't so cynical and irresponsible. It is a lie, plain and simple.
Yeah, I kinda felt the same way when he was bitchin' about the auto bondholders a while back -- it would be laughable if they weren't subsidizing the BANK bondholders for HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS, IF NOT TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS. Crazy me, but it just seemed a tad inconsistent. You know, if you thought about it.