Dear Bank Of America - This Is Why We Hate You

PHOTO - The Guillotine Used To Behead Marie Antoinette

• Dear Bank Of America - This Is Why We Hate You
• Nobel Winner Warns Against Obama Stimulus, Calling It ‘Surprisingly Naïve’
• Why I ditched my big BAD bank!
• NYC Comptroller Says 10,000 finance jobs to vanish from Wall Street
• Is Operation Twist already a failure?
• Herman Cain's 9-9-9 tax plan: Break for the rich?
• UK And U.S. Regulators Look To Crack Down On High-Frequency Trading

Comments

[USA Patriot Citizen]

Just line them up end to end, and don't stop, just a endless supply of heads rolling.

[theo]

Amen. We are sick and tired of the lies, criminal acts, outright theft and corporate welfare. TPTB are scared and desperate. They keep moving the same people around the same positions while things only continue to get worse. Austerity at home, MORE 'aid' for Israel and expanded fake 'terror wars'. Secret 'extrajudicial assassinations' of American citizens without due process or in fact ANY evidence. NO protection under the Rule of Law or the Constitution.
The new electric guillotines are spectacular. A wire becomes superheated and cuts through any appendage like a knife through hot butter. Might as well use technological advances against them.

[Dave]

I'll post this in two here and see if someone agrees with me on my view. I too was with Countrywide so naturally B of A claims to be my lender. The problem is, Countrywide misapropriated money long before the exchange/or transition which have you.

B of A did not so much as speak to me when this occured. They do not have a wet signature and I like so many underwent robo signing through both MERS and copy company called ReconTrust. It was ReconTrust who sold my home back to the bank. However they did so without even having a liccense to work in my state. An issue discovered this year.

In short, among other issues that fall under "An act of god in the eyes of the law" which prevented me from following through with a BK 13 as well blatent denial of mediation via a congressional letter I obatained through my Congresswoman. For the life of me I do not understand how a president has not been set by now?

All that aside the two issues that seem to illude my understanding is, the FTC has done nothing. Yet worse is in our country the last time Digital Due Process was formally addressed was in 1986.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYYjr3XNaGs&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Knowing this as fact, how can anyone think that a wet signature alone is not an issue if not a solid case for such a president to assist people fighting for there homes?

I would love to hear anyone's thoughts on this. I have resigned myself to the belief that it's a great way to keep the legal system flowing with money. Since judges are elected they have to please huge corporations etc. who placed them there. There's poision just about everywhere I've turned. Now I understand the Supreme Court has taken favor with MERS? Again I have trouble believing it could be nothing less.

I can understand Digital Due Process being in question. However Due Process is hurtin for certin. So afraid of Digital Due Process. For me, taking sides in favor of MERS anywhere should in turn acknowledge all the emails I sent to various people as much as a certified letter. And I did all of that in Due Dilligence in order to avoid being lables as negligent. It simply does not add up.

[Texas Dar]

Dave, the only people that are honest today are us on the bottom. The hand full of the good goverment people, "RP", well we can see how thats workin for them.............

This and all the bail outs obama has handed out is whats behind OWS............