Bernie Sanders On What Banking Should Be: "It's Clear Bernanke's Magic Money Printing Is Working, It's Just Unclear For Whom"
Video - Sanders with Ratigan - Feb. 9, 2011
Excellent discussion. It's been a while since we've heard from the Vermont Senator, as he offers his views on Bernanke, inflation, the economy and jobs.
Below is an editorial penned by Sanders in December of 2010.
--
A Real Jaw Dropper at the Federal Reserve
By Senator Bernie Sanders
At a Senate Budget Committee hearing in 2009, I asked Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke to tell the American people the names of the financial institutions that received an unprecedented backdoor bailout from the Federal Reserve, how much they received, and the exact terms of this assistance. He refused. A year and a half later, as a result of an amendment that I was able to include in the Wall Street reform bill, we have begun to lift the veil of secrecy at the Fed, and the American people now have this information.
It is unfortunate that it took this long, and it is a shame that the biggest banks in America and Mr. Bernanke fought to keep this secret from the American public every step of the way. But, the details on this bailout are now on the Federal Reserve's website, and this is a major victory for the American taxpayer and for transparency in government.
Importantly, my amendment also required the Government Accountability Office to conduct a top-to-bottom audit of all of the emergency lending the Fed provided during the financial crisis to be completed on July 21, 2011, which will take a hard look at all of the potential conflicts of interest that took place with respect to this bailout. So, in many respects, details that the Fed was forced to divulge on Wednesday about the $3.3 trillion in emergency loans that until now were totally kept from public scrutiny, marked the beginning, not the end, of lifting the veil of secrecy at the Fed.
After years of stonewalling by the Fed, the American people are finally learning the incredible and jaw-dropping details of the Fed's multi-trillion-dollar bailout of Wall Street and corporate America. As a result of this disclosure, other members of Congress and I will be taking a very extensive look at all aspects of how the Federal Reserve functions and how we can make our financial institutions more responsive to the needs of ordinary Americans and small businesses.
What have we learned so far from the disclosure of more than 21,000 transactions? We have learned that the $700 billion Wall Street bailout signed into law by President George W. Bush turned out to be pocket change compared to the trillions and trillions of dollars in near-zero interest loans and other financial arrangements the Federal Reserve doled out to every major financial institution in this country. Among those are Goldman Sachs, which received nearly $600 billion; Morgan Stanley, which received nearly $2 trillion; Citigroup, which received $1.8 trillion; Bear Stearns, which received nearly $1 trillion, and Merrill Lynch, which received some $1.5 trillion in short term loans from the Fed.
We also learned that the Fed's multi-trillion bailout was not limited to Wall Street and big banks, but that some of the largest corporations in this country also received a very substantial bailout. Among those are General Electric, McDonald's, Caterpillar, Harley Davidson, Toyota and Verizon.
Perhaps most surprising is the huge sum that went to bail out foreign private banks and corporations including two European megabanks -- Deutsche Bank and Credit Suisse -- which were the largest beneficiaries of the Fed's purchase of mortgage-backed securities.
Deutsche Bank, a German lender, sold the Fed more than $290 billion worth of mortgage securities. Credit Suisse, a Swiss bank, sold the Fed more than $287 billion in mortgage bonds.
Has the Federal Reserve of the United States become the central bank of the world?
The Fed said that this bailout was necessary to prevent the world economy from going over a cliff. But three years after the start of the recession, millions of Americans remain unemployed and have lost their homes, life savings and ability to send their kids to college. Meanwhile, big banks and corporations have returned to making huge profits and paying their executives record-breaking compensation packages as if the financial crisis they started never happened.
What this disclosure tells us, among many other things, is that despite this huge taxpayer bailout, the Fed did not make the appropriate demands on these institutions necessary to rebuild our economy and protect the needs of ordinary Americans.
For example, at a time when big banks have nearly a trillion dollars in excess reserves parked at the Fed, the Fed did not require these institutions to increase lending to small- and medium-sized businesses as a condition of the bailout.
At a time when large corporations are more profitable than ever, the Fed did not demand that corporations that received this backdoor bailout create jobs and expand the economy once they returned to profitability.
I intend to investigate whether these secret Fed loans, in some cases, turned out to be direct corporate welfare to big banks that used these loans not to reinvest in the economy but rather to lend back to the federal government at a higher rate of interest by purchasing Treasury Securities. Instead of using this money to reinvest in the productive economy, I suspect a large portion of these near-zero interest loans were used to buy Treasury Securities at a higher interest rate providing free money to some of the largest financial institutions in this country. That is something that we have got to closely examine.
At a time when Wall Street executives are now making more money than before the financial crisis, how many big banks that paid back TARP funds in 2009 to avoid limits on executive compensation received no-strings-attached loans from the Federal Reserve?
At a time when millions of Americans are paying outrageously high credit card interest rates, why didn't the Fed require credit card issuers to lower interest rates as a condition of the bailout?
The four largest banks in this country (Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup) issue half of all mortgages in this country. We now know that these banks received hundreds of billions from the Fed. How many Americans could have remained in their homes, if the Fed required these bailed-out banks to reduce mortgage payments as a condition of receiving these secret loans?
We have begun to lift the veil of secrecy at one of most important agencies in our government. What we are seeing is the incredible power of a small number of people who have incredible conflicts of interest getting incredible help from the taxpayers of this country while ignoring the needs of the people.
##
Editor's Note: Headline quote is from Ratigan, not Bernie Sanders.
Apr 8, 2011 at 8:40 PM
Reader Comments (16)
Bernie Sanders Blasts Wall Street, Government In Wake Of Fed Disclosures (VIDEO)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/23/mike-huckabee-afghanistan_n_827317.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/23/government-funding-talks-dissolve_n_827431.html
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/50021.html
Existing Home Sales Rise, Prices Hit 2002 Low
* * *
"The four largest banks in this country (Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup) issue half of all mortgages in this country. We now know that these banks received hundreds of billions from the Fed."
* * *
Based on C alone ($1.8 trillion) from the first paragraph above, shouldn't "hundreds of billions" really read "trillions"?
Other than that--which may be nothing, if Sanders were only tabulating interest, I suppose--this letter should be voted into the American Rebel Hall of Fame forthwith.
Call me a socialist all day long, I call you swine.
Sanders is a senator, Paul a congressman. Here is a link to the House vote on Audit the Fed from July 2010...
http://www.ronpaul.com/2010-07-01/audit-the-fed-fails-229-198/
Do you have a link showing Sanders' nay vote? I'm not doubting you, as there is seemingly no end to Fed shenanigans, but I couldn't find anything clean. Thanks in advance.
P.S. Readers shouldn't forget that Bloomie's (read: Mark Pittman) suit against the fed went swimmingly in the district court and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fed then petitioned for cert....
These cocky feisty Congress members really get to be good actors on the stage. If they would just come forward and tell us the deep and dark secrets, then maybe we might trust them and believe in their leadership. They know of the corruption, fraud and treason that occurs in their little world. I'm sick of the talk...let's see ya walk the talk Mister.
George Soros looks to establish new global finance system
http://rt.com/news/george-soros-new-world/
Inflation Hits Main Street: Small Businesses Raising Prices
http://www.cnbc.com/id/42493874
Some Banks Should Face Criminal Charges Over Foreclosuregate
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/04/some-banks-should-face-criminal-charges-over-foreclosuregate/236838/
25% being charged on a credit card when the banks are paying what?
What are the banks paying in interest now, 1%/? Less??
So why do people still use credit cards?
Oh yeah, stoopidity!
IF people used cash.... oh never mind.
http://digital.vpr.net/post/bernie-sanders-announce-presidential-run