Quantcast
Feeds: Email, RSS & Twitter

Get Our Videos By Email

 

8,300 Unique Visitors In The Past Day

 

Powered by Squarespace

 

Most Recent Comments
Cartoons & Photos
SEARCH
« The Last Days Of Lehman Brothers - The Movie | Main | Bernanke's Last Supper And The Return Of Larry Summers »
Thursday
Jan172013

BAILOUT SUPERSTARS: Obama, Jacob Lew And Citigroup

Robert Rubin wins again.

---

By John Titus, creator of the new documentary Bailout.

Obama Keeps Top Bailout Recipient Citigroup In Charge Of U.S. Treasury

President Obama has picked former Citigroup executive Jacob Lew to replace Citigroup minion Timothy Geithner as Treasury Secretary.

Tim seemed to view his job as protecting Citigroup,” said then-FDIC Chair Sheila Bair.

At Obama's Treasury, the “change you can believe in” is apparent only from the difference in roles played by Lew and Geithner with respect to Citigroup: Lew personally benefited from the corporate welfare lavished on Citigroup in the bailouts that began in 2008, whereas Geithner orchestrated the welfare on Citigroup’s behalf.

For 2008, Lew received an enormous bonus--$944,578--shortly after Citigroup posted a loss of $27 billion that year. Despite the unprecedented size of the loss, Citigroup was able to pay Lew’s bonus because it received $45 billion from the TARP program.

In fairness to the much-maligned TARP bailout, it is unclear whether Citigroup paid Lew’s bonus directly out of the $45,000,000,000.00 check it received from the Treasury as part of that program. That’s because Citigroup also received $2.5 trillion in loans from the Federal Reserve—where Tim Geithner worked when the loans began.

The Federal Reserve concealed the loans until a GAO audit forced their disclosure in 2011.

Nor is it clear whether Geithner directed that taxpayers ring-fence $300 billion in Citigroup’s toxic assets as a cushion against Lew’s bonus, which amplified what would have been merely a $27.699 billion loss into the full $27.7 billion loss actually reported by the bank that year.

Whatever the case, Lew felt the $944,578 bonus was enough of an issue that he concealed it from the public until 4 days after filing his ethics disclosure to join the White House.

It would not be the last of Lew's financial disclosure problems, which continued when Lew became Obama's budget director.

"Lew, as the president's budget director, appeared before Congress and continued to insist that President Obama's budget-which Lew had crafted-would not add to the debt of the United States," [Senator] Sessions said.

Historians expect Lew to ascribe blame for his fiscal obfuscation to the popular Turbo Tax software when he appears before the Senate.

If confirmed, Lew would be the most recent additon to a long line of Robert Rubin protégés in the Obama Administration and indeed controlling the White House itself.

***

John Titus has practiced law in federal courts for more than 15 years.

 

Watch a Trailer for BAILOUT

 

Related from Titus:

Why Is The S.E.C. Concealing Massive Citigroup Fraud?

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (19)

Nice job John. I had been planning a Jacob Lew links post so I will dump some of them here.
Jan 10, 2013 at 11:50 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
As a former aide to the late House Speaker Tip O’Neill, a Massachusetts Democrat, and a two-time director of the Office of Management and Budget, Lew has experience on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue.

He’s spent most of his career in government, with a brief detour to Wall Street, where he worked as a managing director for Citigroup from July 2006 until joining the administration as deputy secretary of state for management and resources when Obama first took office in early 2009.

Lew served as Obama’s director of the Office of Management and Budget from November 2010 to January 2012. He held the position previously from July 1998 to January 2001, in President Bill Clinton’s administration.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-09/obama-said-to-name-lew-tomorrow-as-choice-to-replace-geithner.html
Jan 10, 2013 at 11:52 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Below are just a few excerpts from Woodward's book, "The Price of Politics":

[Brett] Loper [House Speaker John Boehner's policy director] found Lew obnoxious. The budget director was doing 75 percent of the talking, lecturing everyone not only about what Obama's policy was, but also why it was superior to the Republicans'.

Lew was incredulous when he considered the Republican proposal as a whole. The changes they were considering sounded simple. But the speaker's office was laying down general principles and looking to apply them to extremely complex programs. The devil was always in the details.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/13/jack-lew-obama-chief-of-staff_n_1879360.html
Jan 10, 2013 at 11:55 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
President Obama’s choice to be the government’s chief budget officer received a bonus of more than $900,000 from Citigroup Inc. last year — after the Wall Street firm for which he worked received a massive taxpayer bailout.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jul/28/omb-nominee-got-900000-after-citigroup-bailout/
Jan 11, 2013 at 12:08 AM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Jan 11, 2013 at 12:10 AM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
In total, Citigroup received $476.2 billion in cash and guarantees. (Not counting the Fed)

http://www.cnbc.com/id/42099554/Citigroup_Tops_List_of_Banks_Who_Received_Federal_Aid
Jan 11, 2013 at 12:20 AM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
For the uninitiated, Lew is replacing Geithner as president. Obama has as much power in the White House as the cigar store Indian has in the smoke shop.

http://dailybail.com/home/dylan-ratigan-with-author-ron-suskind-tim-geithner-ran-the-w.html
Jan 11, 2013 at 12:27 AM | Registered CommenterCheyenne
Jesus, DB, I hadn't seen CNBC's bailout total of $0.48 trillion in handouts and other gifts for Citigroup. When you add in the interest-free loans Citi got from the Fed, the total is $3 trillion--more than the GDP of France. Mon Dieu.

And yet Citigroup STILL had to declare a 1-for-10 reverse stock split to stay over $5 a share.

When reality caught up to Lehman Brothers, its balance sheet had a $600 billion hole in it. What is the real number for Citigroup? But no worries. Ponzi schemes last forever.
Jan 11, 2013 at 12:55 AM | Registered CommenterCheyenne
Flashback

CIT Files for Bankruptcy, First Loser in Government Bailout

snip

Seeking Alpha’s Eli Hoffman puts yesterday’s CIT bankruptcy filing–the fifth largest in US history–in context:
CIT Group (CIT) filed for bankruptcy protection Sunday with broad support from its debtholders, but taxpayers will lose the $2.3B invested in CIT, marking the first definitive loss in the government’s rescue of the financial system.
Nearly 90% of CIT’s bondholders voted in favor of the prepackaged bankruptcy, which CIT says will enable it to reduce total debt by $10B, significantly reduce its liquidity needs over the next three years, enhance its capital ratios and accelerate its return to profitability. Bondholders will receive about $0.70 on the dollar, a number that could have fallen as low as $0.06 had CIT entered a freefall bankruptcy. With $71B in assets and $65B in liabilities, CIT’s bankruptcy ranks among the largest in corporate history.

http://www.businesspundit.com/cit-files-for-bankruptcy-first-loser-in-government-bailout/

Flashback

Bailed-Out Banks Donating To Obama's Inauguration

Citibank executives, who are expected to ask for another billion-dollar federal bailout on top of the $45 billion in rescue funds they received in November, are trying to buy the goodwill of Barack Obama -- or they just want to help the president-elect throw the best inauguration party in history.

Of the hundreds of banks and firms which have received bailout money, Citibank
employees have contributed the most to Obama's inauguration fund -- at least $113,000 as of Wednesday.

Among those contributions is $50,000 from Ray McGuire, Citi's co-head of global investment banking, and $50,000 from Louis Susman, the recently-retired vice chairman of Citigroup.

more

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/14/bailed-out-banks-donating_n_157960.html

What Recession? The $170 Million Inauguration

snip

Best Seats in the House

The biggest group of donors were none other than the recently bailed-out Wall Street executives and employees.

"The finance sector is well represented, despite its recent troubles," Ritsch said. "Those who worked in finance still managed to pull together nearly $7 million for the inauguration."

The donors will get some of the best seats in the house for the inauguration, as well as admittance to some of the best balls and other events.

in full

http://abcnews.go.com/Business/Inauguration/president-obama-inauguration-cost-170-million/story?id=6665946
Jan 11, 2013 at 1:33 AM | Unregistered CommenterLadyLiberty
Just bend me over. Really. And if you say anything contrary to CNN then you are considered a dangerous person. These people can destroy entire towns, counties and cities. They can launder money for drug cartels and finance gun running. They can steal your money and foreclose on your property. Complete hypocrisy. Then they feign indignity when you call them down on it, all the while they hire armed to the teeth body guards.and enjoy the complete and total immunity from the people that we supposedly elected to SERVE us. We are being serviced alright. What a way to start the day. Don't need paddles for the heart though I may need some sort med to slow my heart down. I think I will go to town and hit one of the open air drug markets. Bought to you by HSBC.
Jan 11, 2013 at 7:27 AM | Unregistered CommenterSKINFLINT
Any body will be better then Geithner. One look at him conferms that!!
Jan 11, 2013 at 6:48 PM | Unregistered CommenterAmerican Patriot
Trillions for the banksters, austerity for the SLAVE SCUM. The people are starting to awake to realize that they are only enslaved with paper and ink. 16 Trillion debt. TO WHO??? Money created from nothing loaned at %.
Gen X says " WE ARE NOT PAYING" " WE ARE NOT PAYING!!!!!" The "Debt" owed to the "FED" goes to ZERO and we Start over WITHOUT the FED. and the INCOME TAX. WE ARE NOT SLAVES. We will not work until we drop and still die in DEBT.
My children are not DEBT SLAVES.
Jan 11, 2013 at 9:59 PM | Unregistered CommenterSteve
Don't know if you guys have seen this already, but here's an interview wtih Valukas and a discussion of the lack of prosecutions in the Lehman fiasco.

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/01/ian-fraser-something-sinister-about-the-lack-of-prosecutions-at-lehman-brothers.html
Jan 25, 2013 at 10:58 AM | Unregistered CommenterDr. Pitchfork
"Don't know if you guys have seen this already, but here's an interview wtih Valukas and a discussion of the lack of prosecutions in the Lehman fiasco."

I did see it but couldn't get the video to load. The post that went along with the video said it was Valukas' first interview since the Lehman bk report. If that's true, then the video was with Steve Kroft of 60 Minutes. But that interview happened in April 2012, so I thought maybe it had something to do with the S.E.C. since that's really the Lehman story in a nutshell: on-site regulators look the other way as Lehman commits accounting fraud and punishes employees who raise questions about accounting fraud.

Criminality and punishing truth tellers who try to do their jobs would certainly tie in with the appointment of Mary jo White to head the S.E.C., but the post scarcely mentioned that, as I recall. Go figure then.
Jan 25, 2013 at 6:25 PM | Registered CommenterCheyenne
Insight: Why Citi wants to rack up U.S. taxes

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/18/us-citigroup-taxes-insight-idUSBRE95H03E20130618


(Reuters) - Over the past few years, Citigroup Inc has been grappling with an unusual problem - how to incur more U.S. taxes.

The third-largest U.S. bank tried to buy the foundering Wachovia Corp in the fall of 2008 in part because the deal would have brought it more taxable domestic income, a person familiar with the matter said.

In February this year, it agreed to buy a portfolio of about $7 billion in credit card loans to Best Buy Co Inc customers from Capital One Financial Corp - and taxes played a role in the bank's decision to do the deal, Chief Executive Michael Corbat said in March.

Citigroup is even reclassifying overseas profit as money that it might bring back to the United States, an odd move in an era in which many American companies try to keep much of their foreign income abroad to avoid paying higher U.S. taxes on the profits.

The bank is not feeling generous — it is just looking to use up $55 billion of tax credits and deductions, known as deferred tax assets, as of the end of March.

It had accumulated them from losses and foreign tax payments largely during and after the financial crisis. About 95 percent of these future tax benefits are in the United States.

Realizing these benefits over time could be worth some $27 billion to Citigroup today, or about $9 per share for a stock that trades at around $50 a share, according to John McDonald, a veteran bank analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein.

Using all these assets will free up more than $40 billion, about one-third, of the bank's capital. Citigroup could then return more capital to shareholders through stock-boosting moves like share buybacks.

Deferred tax assets arise because U.S. companies have to keep two sets of books - one for the financial markets, and a second for the Internal Revenue Service. The bank recognizes items including costs, such as expected losses on loans, at different times on the two books.
Jun 18, 2013 at 8:01 AM | Unregistered Commenterjohn

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.