Wednesday
Jul112012
Aussie Family Slugged With 'Carbon Tax' -- For Funeral... 'Even The Dead Don't Escape' (LINKS)
- IRS to hire thousands more agents to collect new health care taxes
- Lawyers Have Already Drafted 13,000 Pages of Regulations for Obamacare
- It's Official! - Spain to Cede Bank Control for Bailout Bucks - WSJ
- Texas rejects key provisions of Obamacare
- Lawsuits And LIBOR: NYT Analysis
- Family slugged with 'carbon tax' for funeral... 'Even the dead don't escape'
- French president: zero growth so far this year
- Vatican posts $19 million deficit, worst in years
- Worst TB outbreak in 20 years kept secret
- Lobbyists Hold 'White Trash Reception' on Capitol Hill
- Jordanian MP pulls a gun during live TV debate
Jul 11, 2012 at 12:58 PM
Reader Comments (7)
Violation of my
Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Central Lincoln PUD
P.O. Box 1126
Newport, OR 97365
board members,
PRESIDENT Ron Benfield..rbenfield@newportnet.com
VICE PRESIDENT Curt Abbott cabbott@peak.org
SECRETARY Judy Matheny jjmatheny@q.com
TREASURER Tom Tymchuk ttymchuk@cencoast.com
DIRECTOR Larkin Kaliher lkaliher@cencoast.com
Introduction to this letter of violation of my and all legal Americans 4th amendment, born rights
Final Episode of Freedom Watch: When the Government Fears the People, There Is Liberty
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zhdNRbrR2E&feature=share
I do not participant in violation of our ,yours and my 1st, 4th,10th ,16th ETC>> amendment of Constitutional born rights.
I do NOT VOLUNTARY COMPLY with any Smart meters or any other devices that are in , VIOLATION OF our 4TH Amendment rights
APPLIED
Consent search - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Overview|
Other parties|
Revoking consent and exceptions|
References
... conducting the consent search does not necessarily have to be identified as a law enforcement officer, and the person granting consent need not be the person police ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consent_search - Cached
I would like to thank pud for not putting an smartmeter on my home.
..In Helping the Elected and public employees unions members All NON_PROFITS, Public utility commissioners,{ Destroying Ours, yours , present and future grandchildren FREE use of public lands and all common law right of ways.. http://www.patriotnetwork.info/Citizens_rule_book.htm
The posiblity of new sickness of our community thast could be related from any said smart meter aim..etc,, volition of your 4th amendment rights.
www.kjonline.com/news/Lawsuit-targets-CMP-smart-meters.html
2.7-14
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any state or territory, subjects or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.(Civil Rights) 42 U.S.C. 1963.
wiki.answers.com/Q/How_do_remedies_at_law_differ_from
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_remedy
So If you trespass other then reading the meter I have right now meter number 56088,,,,95601441,
Remedy, 20lbs 99.9 pure gold in one ounce pieces and $500,000.00 Cashiers check. To the strawman account of edwand malone johnston or to his trust, My Clan Name Is Boyd.
If you trespass and violate my 4th amendment.
two weeks after violation installation.
The Board members our each liable for all court and lawyer fees/under .
.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Due_process
SAY NO TO HOME INVASION
I would like to thank Lincoln county pud board for not installing an smart-meter tracking device on my home.
Please educate yourself on the real purpose possibility's of the smart meters and the elected and public employees pre-crime bill. commercial codes agents for personal gain
The possibility of new unidentified sickness of our community that could be related from any said smart meter aim..etc,,
some links
www.kjonline.com/news/Lawsuit-targets-CMP-smart-meters.html
http://stopsmartmetersirvine.com/
www.refusesmartmeters.com
Smart Meter Nausea - YouTube,
Radiation Sickness: Smart Meter and Animals? - Detect Energy
In my opinion in violates your constitutional rights.
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any state or territory, subjects or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.(Civil Rights) 42 U.S.C. 1963.
Minority Report' Precrime for Real? House Bill Would Have ...
[Aug 8, 2011] in ' Minority Report,' Tom Cruise played a member of a police ' precrime' unit, arresting people for crimes they had not yet committed. A bill in Congress proposes ... ( 11 Comments )
abcnews.go.com/Technology/minority-report-precrime-real...
Remember it is possible for anyone could be allege committing a crime in your home from this device,
volition of your 4th amendment rights.
7.44-47
Judges are not immune from criminal sanctions under the Civil Rights Act. ex parte Virginia (1879), 100 U.S. 339.
8.59-65
By the great weight of authority it is acknowledged that generally "public officials" are not immune from suit when they allegedly violate the civil rights of citizens, and that a "public official's" defense of immunity is to be sparingly applied in these kinds of cases. James v. Ogilvie, 1970, DC Ill., 310 F. Sup. 661, 663.
Stop Smart Meters, Orange County, CA
Messages In This Digest (1 Message)
1a.
Important Info on Smart Meter Opt Out for SCE and SDG&E Customers From: melissa levine
View All Topics | Create New Topic
Message
1a.
Important Info on Smart Meter Opt Out for SCE and SDG&E Customers
Posted by: "melissa levine" Melissalevine@cox.net melissalevine1
Thu Apr 19, 2012 11:05 pm (PDT)
I posted this on web site. It has info for getting one's analog meter
back, which I highly recommend (even if they are charging).
Melissa
http://stopsmartmet ersirvine. com/2012/ 04/19/free- at-last-cpuc- approves- smart-meter- opt-out-for- sce-and-sdge- dr-neil-cherry- rfs-effect- on-neurotransmit ters-public- space-increasing ly-irradiated/
Free at Last: CPUC Approves Smart Meter Opt Out for SCE and SDG&E; Dr.
Neil Cherry: RF's Effect on Neurotransmitters; Public Space
Increasingly Irradiated
Posted onApril 19, 2012
<http://stopsmartmet ersirvine. com/2012/ 04/19/free- at-last-cpuc- approves- smart-meter- opt-out-for- sce-and-sdge- dr-neil-cherry- rfs-effect- on-neurotransmit ters-public- space-increasing ly-irradiated/>
Good News. :)
Today the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) approved a
smart meter opt out option for both Southern California Edison and San
Diego Gas and Electric customers. Please share this information with
friends and neighbors.
From the SCE press release: /"Starting May 9, customers may opt out by
calling 1-800-810-2369. For customers already on the delay list,
calling the number will enable them to enroll in the opt-out program and
keep their current meters. Customers who have a smart meter, but would
like to opt out, can have their meter exchanged for the type (i.e.
electro-mechanical analog meter or non analog, non-smart digital meter)
that was previously in place."
/San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E) has not yet announced the date
their opt out will go into effect, but they need to offer it within
twenty days. Their contact number is 1-800-411-7383 .
Even though the CPUC has given the utilities permission to charge (price
gouge?) California rate payers to opt out (a 75 dollar initial fee even
if you already have an analog and a ten dollar additional monthly fee) I
recommend that people still go for it. They don't want you to. (They
have many plans--financial incentives-- for their smart grid including
feeding your information to third party vendors). *Inactivate their
"smart" meter program by refusing to participate! * Also, when you opt
out you can send a note that you are paying the opt out fee "under
protest." See also the Northern Californian web site Stop Smart
meters! for othersuggestions
<http://stopsmartmet ers.org/2012/ 04/10/we- are-not-opting- out-we-are- refusing- to-opt-in- theres-a- difference/>to
challenge the fees.
Besides
Besides the satisfaction of not going along with the big utility
monoliths, there are, of course, other reasons to opt out of a "smart"
meter. It is extremely easy for all of us to be inattentive to the
possible effects of non ionizing radiation--as it is invisible, has no
taste or smell, etc. You can only tell if you are being irradiated if
you have a special meter/analyzer or if you happen to be
electrohypersensiti ve.
However, there are too many studies, including WHO's designation of it
as a carcinogen, which show (even as it becomes so ubiquitous in our
society) that Radio Frequency electromagnetic radiation may have adverse
health effects. Arecent Yale study
<http://www.nature. com/srep/ 2012/120315/ srep00312/ full/srep00312. html>involving cell
phones and mice, for example, showed cognitive changes from non
ionizing radiation. Also, even though you may not be able to
immediately feel the effects radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation is
having on you, your cells are still responding. As the lateDr.Neil
Cherry has said in a radio interview
<http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=ROUOrl- GvnM&feature= relmfu> /"Our brain
is an electromagnetic organ. [In] our central nervous system, every cell
communicates with its neighbors to see how they are--using
electromagnetic signals." /One effect radio frequency electromagnetic
radiation has is to disrupt the calcium ions in our brains. . Says Dr.
Cherry/"calcium ions control the neurotransmitters in the brain. . .
.//If you expose the brain to these frequencies- you alter the calcium
ions--you alter the brain patterns. That's what Ross Adey in California
showed; repeated by the EPA; Carl Blackman; and it's been repeated in
about 10 or 12 laboratories in the world--that calcium ions are changed
by these signals. That's pretty well established. Frequencies match and
cells react and change the behavior which changes the brain pattern, the
reaction time."/
To stay updated about the ins and outs of the Smart Meter rulings,
please see the following web sites and Facebook pages Burbank Action
<http://burbankactio n.wordpress. com/2012/ 04/19/sce- smart-meter- opt-out-program- what-does- it-mean-for- you/>,
StopOCSmartMeters, <http://www.stopocsm artmeters. com/>Stop Smart Meters
Now (Facebook)
<http://www.facebook .com/pages/ Stop-Smart- Meters-Now/ 146643745375104>,
Center for Electrosmog Prevention
<http://www.electros mogprevention. org/>, EMF Safety Network
<http://emfsafetynet work.org/ ?p=7444>,Stop Smart Meters!
<http://stopsmartmet ers.org/> and Eon3emfblog <http://eon3emfblog. net/>.
among others. There continue to be many issues with the smart meter opt
out option (and the smart grid in general): it doesn't allow businesses
to opt out; doesn't address multiple co-located smart meters; the soon
to come (useless for you but lucrative for them) gas and water "smart"
meters, etc.
My web siteStop Smart Meters Irvine
<http://stopsmartmet ersirvine. com/> also has archived articles, links
and occasional updates. I am not able to update it regularly, but the
entire wireless issue (that is the complete irradiation of our public
spaces) continues to advance.
*Just FYI, Here are Some Mainly Local Examples*:
1.Wi Fi on OCTA Buses. The metal buses create what Dr. George Carlo
calls a resonant cavity (increasing the radiation level); it's like
riding in a traveling microwave oven. (For a funny take on the
"microwave oven" idea, seeStephen Colbert's video
<http://tpmlivewire. talkingpointsmem o.com/2011/ 06/colbert- cell-phone- radiation- aint-so-bad- i-use-it- to-cook-burritos -video.php>where
he puts an Amy's burrito between himself and his cell phone).
2. Wi Fi In Medical Clinics. In Irvine, medical clinics now offer
irradiation services for free (no co pays) not in the radiology
department but in the waiting room: The Kaiser Permanente medical
clinic in Woodbridge, Irvine, frequented by newborns, people with
pacemakers and others with various illnesses is now fitted with
radiation emitting wi fi--because their administrator told me "their
members wanted it."
3 The Irvine libraries have routers right above the reference desk so
the employees are exposed to this all day long. Bonjour? I recommend
they brush up on their French and call the National Library of
France-where Wi Fi was completely removed because librarians became
active and protested the health effects.
4. Buy your Daisy Sour Cream. Irradiate your Head! If you shop at the
local grocery stores, you can be irradiated as you do your grocery
shopping (Albertson's Campus store, dairy section; look above you on
the wall--the spider like device is a high powered router. (There is Wi
Fi in Ralphs and Gelsons, also.)
5. Mission Viejo Library: Special teen only section with cool
irradiating spider: The irradiating "spider" is also affixed to a wall
at the Mission Viejo Library near the children's area.
6. RF Chips Credit Cards: Also besides not holding (as neurosurgeon Dr.
Keith Black recommends) your cell phone to your brain, you might think
twice about stashing your new credit card in your pocket or bra--because
the credit companies are now installing RF chips in these, which creates
not only health but security risks. See this you tube video for the
security issues <http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=lLAFhTjsQHw& sns=em>.
Note: If your company sends you such a card, you can punch the RF chip
out with a hole puncher.)
I will not comply with an With
Radio-frequency identification
Rfid Technology Tracking Devices - Video Results
Play VideoRFID Medical Device Kit Tracking Play Video5 of 8- RFID: The Rise of the Mark of the Beast- Billy Crone Play VideoRFID Hospital Inventory Management - WaveMark
spychips.com - how RFID will compromise privacy, security ...
... where global corporations like IBM, Procter & Gamble, and Wal-Mart's technology partner NCR plan to equip every product with a tracking device and use a network of RFID ...
www.spychips.com - Cached
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=scZLv5pUr40&feature=endscreen
S0 I could be track by credited card SSI number,, .
NEW DRIVERS LICENSE(.YOUR FIRST TRACKING DEVICE ...
NEW DRIVERS LICENSE(.YOUR FIRST TRACKING DEVICE) ... 2:51 Add to US confirms ( RFID) high- tech driver's licences by norfid 15,757 ...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=dw4GBzB5Y3w
By smart meter anyone in the USA could be track in anyone private,{YOU AT ALL TIMES ANY WERE IN THE COUNTRY} are commercial industry.. If you do anything that the elected and public employees unions or any financial not for profit gain on your strawman account
Is it possibly I heard this from Lars Larson on his talk show in feb 2012,,, Please ask him If I'm correct, ::{{Become I my self have been falsely accused in the past}} , As I will emailed to him this as well..,, As I was saying I believe I heard him said on his talk show then If you don't won't to comply smart meters spying or other new job development spying on one anther,{turning you neighbor so there assets can be Confiscated by public employes,family and friends speeding your wealth and assets.. other and it possible medical trauma as-well devices of pre-crime,,,,you don;t need,life ,subsistence food of GOD,Electricity,water ,firewood heat off public lands , What a Christen, If you don't pay your corporation strawman , if you don;t comply , Americans of hundred years are more of all races should starve and dehydrate not have the right to travel.DRIVERS LICENSE VS RIGHT TO TRAVEL
Lars there our responsible Americans why should we give up are freedom for the stockholders of the elected and public employees
.
.en.wikipedia.org/...Final_Settlement_With_Respect_to_Germany
Lars I hope I'm wrong in this please correct me,,
wiki.answers.com/Q/How_do_remedies_at_law_differ_from
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_remedy
www.prisonplanet.com/pre-crime-technology-to-be-used-in
Why are DHS and ICE stockpiling ammo? - YouTube
The US Department of Homeland Security and the Immigrations and Customs Enforcement Office have placed an order for 450 million rounds of .40 caliber ...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lw64vE0HXQ - Cached
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_ to_the_United..
my opinion PLEASE DON"T TAKE THIS WRONG anyone, , To me you are saying to all LEGALLY BORN AMERICANS BORN WHO OUR TRULY BORN ON USA. SOIL HAVE TO COMPLY WITH MARITIME LAWS. OF THE STRAWMAN ACCOUNT >>>..Of those who don't have GOD given rights of Country...YouTube - Republic vs Democracy
if you do not comply in giving up your 4th amendment,"",This includes drug testing of the innocent for profits is a violations wears our compensation from commerce for the lost of our born rights"",Civil Rights) 42 U.S.C. 1963.2.7-14..www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/ uscode42/usc_sec_42..
In My opinion how can any American can deprived life from GOD almighty,, of Subsistence food hunting and fishing off of the coast lines and public lands,, Eclectic, Water, medical ,public service,,,,,,oathkeepers.org/oath/about
PLEASE SIR LARS I HOPE I"M NOT misquoting YOU in any way>> IF I AM PLEASE EXCEPT MY APOLOGIES RIGHT KNOW>>KNOW IN GOD ALMIGHTY S NAME<<I DO APOLOGIZE NOW IF I"M WRONG>>>I personally know what that is like when some one else puts wrongs in ones mouth,, I personally try never to do that,.....
In my opinion would consider this treason to real legal Americans.
oathkeepers.org/oath/about
evergreen15317.org/met.php?irk=bush- signs...treaty-2006
I believe this is commerce agreements
www.yourstrawman.com
German-American Relations - President George Bush ...
President George Bush. September ... to ratification, the Treaty on the Final Settlement with Respect to Germany and a Related Agreed Minute, signed ...
usa.usembassy.de/etexts/ga6-900925.htm - Cached
What is Sovereign Citizenship? - American Patriot Network
ARTICLE #1: What is Sovereign Citizenship? by Scott Eric Rosenstiel What is Sovereign Citizenship? Sovereign Citizenship is the status held by our forefathers.
This means That the legal Americans you do not have signed his or her rights away to the corporation of the elected and public employes unions members or any other unknown corruption we all have no rights this includes you as well.. With respect here ..your are entering in a Maritime law contract . Apply only to legal American
employ .... SO WHY SHOULD I BE.,,,, like most ., Physically disabled and elderly, an legal American worker we have rights by
.http://www.oregontrackers.com/Civil_Rights.html
Despite those who don't believe we DO have rights..
Our Legal American for-fathers since 1970 when the debt further on ones strawman for the service we have today,,
where's the countability,and bank statements from our elected and public employees member corporation agency's from the last 70 years of existence...
As you personally know that Americans across the states our still denied countability of taxes and budget figures , local bank statements , That I believe is call local control of separation from church and state.., from our local union and city cooperation.. {{{This exclude private unions the our paid for bay direct tax dollars. so we and our children today don;e have to live in fear of legal AMERICANS,,, the value of their know what is gowning and what is written off on the strawman.... www.yourstrawman.com..
gift to www.oregontrackers.org
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Three_of_the_United_States_Constitution
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treason
Pending Cases
http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/pge-sued-over-smart-meters-slows-down-bakersfield-deployment/
http://www.smartmeters.com/the-news/690-pgae-smart-meter-problem-a-pr-nightmare.html
http://ppjg.me/2012/01/14/smart-meters-pge-blinks-after-lawsuit-is-filed/
http://www.kjonline.com/news/Lawsuit-targets-CMP-smart-meters.html
By installing thous meter on any Legal American violate his or her GOD GIVEN RIGHTS UNDER GOD::{{ NOT THE DEVIL||||<< YOUR GOD GIVEN rights.. That Adolf Hitler and democracy.. YouTube - Republic vs Democracy .wont you to live this way.. Our LEGAL AMERICANS Grand parent and siblings. went and fought the
,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Revolution,,en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_ Wa.
Civil war To my understanding my Ancestry fought for.Republic Separation from church and state..Live's were sacrificed in the belief so we would not have to pay the slavery taxes to the elected and public employes of Federal state state local employes.,property, local,excise taxes.,1776 revolutionary, , Civil, war, war of 1812,
WWI, WWII answers.yahoo.com/question/ index?qid=20111026194608AAoN74M
for FREEDOM FROM THE DEVIL< Democracy is willing to destroy your own Constitutional born rights and your legal bloodline children's freedom to live on yours, our their owned land or rented, .
www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/freedom
YouTube - The American Dream By The Provocateur Network
..This I would call treason to our for father and mothers that gave for you to live with your constitutional rights of,,, http://www.patriotnetwork.info/Citizens_rule_book.htm....DRIVERS LICENSE VS RIGHT TO TRAVEL
,,, please allow other legal Americans to live with out your guilt, pain, and ,.. there is no reason to pass it on to legal American for generations to come,
Is this what you wont for yourself and children,,
'Minority Report' Precrime for Real? House Bill Would Have ...
[Aug 8, 2011] in 'Minority Report,' Tom Cruise played a member of a police ' precrime' unit, arresting people for crimes they had not yet committed. A bill in Congress proposes ... ( 11 Comments )
abcnews.go.com/Technology/minority- report-precrime-real...
http://www.refusesmartmeters.com/
in violation of mine and you constitutional born rights,An denied our Constitutional legal rights, The elected and public employees unions and federal states county and city won;e you to sign your rights,,, over so they can claim you asset for their our god of choice.
Maritime Admiralty Law - YouTube
Maritime Admiralty Law Jordan Maxwell PLEASE CLICK on the AD to the RIGHT of THIS VIDEO by doing this you will help me to raise my Channel. You DO NOT have ...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZqb0TW15EE - Cached
.Play Video
More results from youtube.com »
Smart meter - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Overview|
Purpose|
Implementation examples|
Imminent implementation
A smart meter is usually an electrical meter that records consumption of electric energy in intervals of an hour or less and communicates that information at least ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_meter - Cached
More results from en.wikipedia.org »
Stop Smart Meters! | Fighting for your health, privacy, and ...
You can certainly blame your utility and state and federal regulatory agencies for those headaches—both real and figurative—since the smart meter went in.
stopsmartmeters.org - Cached
Smart Meters - YouTube
Use the letter below to forbid smart meter installation (or modify the letter to demand the meter be removed). From: Energy Customer's Name Street Address ...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JNFr_j6kdI - Cached
.Play Video
More results from youtube.com »
Smart Meters - Smart Meter News and Information
Smart Meters are an innovative and advanced utility meter that records a business or consumers energy, water or gas usage in real time and in greater detail than ...
www.smartmeters.com
please give a gift for the disable
in helping them
www.oregontrackers.org
http://www.youtube.com/embed/nA3LtXnNIto?feature=player_embedded
Have more if interested..
here's some info what do you think...
pass on you like..
What happened in Freetopia? A video fable about modern America - NaturalNews.tv
YouTube - Republic vs Democracy
DRIVERS LICENSE VS RIGHT TO TRAVEL
SUI JURIS - THE TRUTH IN THE RECORD - Gaston
How public schools are nothing more than prisons that train slaves (video), page 1
YouTube - The American Dream By The Provocateur Network
YouTube - illegal seizure , 4th amendment violation
http://www.naturalnews.com/035032_hypochondriacs_drug_marketing_pills.html
,,, please allow other legal Americans to live with out your guilt, pain, and ,.. there is no reason to pass it on to legal American for generations to come,
Is this what you wont for yourself and children,,
'Minority Report' Precrime for Real? House Bill Would Have ...
[Aug 8, 2011] in 'Minority Report,' Tom Cruise played a member of a police ' precrime' unit, arresting people for crimes they had not yet committed. A bill in Congress proposes ... ( 11 Comments )
abcnews.go.com/Technology/minority- report-precrime-real...
I'm disabled denied service, I was injured on the job, Recorded in oregon,
can afford to pay permits and other device like hunting and fishing odfw tags,
I'm disabled denied food to gather my self, no transportation for up coming court cases or doctors appointments, our enjoying the day at the river, We see if one dose not pay the privilege to live, we you get it, read on,
Wear's our money the legal American stock holders for generation ,we need all bank accounts to all public agency's and non-profits who reserved money for taxpayers,
Even the elected offices filed numoures complaint against me, Including ,
this.
my house has been intruded this missing. still denied freedom of information,
2006 inspectors generals report. that some did not believe I was really disabled from work related and transportation injuries.
on www.oregontrackers.org
My Claims before the Workers Compensation Board
A letter to Congresswoman Hooley
My Case before the State Court of Appeals
Key medical and procedural docs
Appeal Before the Workers Compensation Board - Part 1 and Part 2
Letter to Judge Ogawa
1.Workmans' Compensation Act, 1914 - Social Work and Social ...
Workmans' Compensation Act, 1914. Employers ... federal legislation in 1914. The Act eliminated the workers' right to sue employers, and instead provided compensation ...
www.socialpolicy.ca/cush/m3/m3-t17.stm - Cached
2.The Workers' Compensation Act
The Maryland General Assembly first enacted the Workers’ Compensation Act in 1914. The purpose of the Act was to provide relief to the increasing number of workers in ...
www.mdcomplaw.com/info/industry/workers-compensation-act - Cached
3.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/94069345/New-but-Old-Knowledge
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 - Wikipedia, the free ...
•Titles of the ADA|
•Major life...|
•Opposition to the...|
•Quotations
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) is a law that was enacted by the U.S. Congress in 1990. It was signed into law on July 26, 1990, by President George ...
en.wikipedia.org/.../Americans_with_Disabilities_Act_of_1990 - Cached
1.WebAIM: United States Laws - Overview of the Rehabilitation ...
Introduction. The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 was the first major legislative effort to secure an equal playing field for individuals with disabilities.
webaim.org/articles/laws/usa/rehab - Cached
2.Johnston v. City of Toledo et al :: Justia Dockets & Filings
Oregon District Court - Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights - Johnston v. City of Toledo et al - Justia Federal Dockets and Filings
dockets.justia.com/docket/oregon/ordce/6:2007cv06302/85536 - Cached
Search results
1.CAFR1 Home Page - Collective Government's True Wealth exposed
Collective Government's True wealth shown. CAFR1 Home Page Collective Government's True Wealth exposed CAFR1 Walter Burien taxation Government Wealth The Biggest Game ...
cafr1.com - Cached
2.1940's Secret "Corporate" Tactic By Which Government Took All!
1940's Secret "Corporate" Tactic By Which Government Took All! By Walter Burien 05/10/09. Many people have asked for a simple explanation as to the intent behind the ...
cafr1.com/Secret.html - Cached
3.cafr1.com - Walter Burien welcomes you to CAFR1
Walter Burien welcomes you to CAFR1 ... car1.com caf1.com cafr.com cafr1com cafr1.om cafr1.cm cafr1.co afr1.com
twitter-icon.com/site/cafr1.com - Cached
must watch if you have children
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SD5-xfbcJI&feature=share
in violation of mine and you constitutional born rights,An denied our Constitutional legal rights, The elected and public employees unions and federal states county and city won;e you to sign your rights,,, over so they can claim you asset for their our god of choice.
1.Maritime Admiralty Law - YouTube
Maritime Admiralty Law Jordan Maxwell PLEASE CLICK on the AD to the RIGHT of THIS VIDEO by doing this you will help me to raise my Channel. You DO NOT have ...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZqb0TW15EE - Cached
.Play Video
More results from youtube.com »
1.Smart meter - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
•Overview|
•Purpose|
•Implementation examples|
•Imminent implementation
A smart meter is usually an electrical meter that records consumption of electric energy in intervals of an hour or less and communicates that information at least ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_meter - Cached
More results from en.wikipedia.org »
2.Stop Smart Meters! | Fighting for your health, privacy, and ...
You can certainly blame your utility and state and federal regulatory agencies for those headaches—both real and figurative—since the smart meter went in.
stopsmartmeters.org - Cached
3.Smart Meters - YouTube
Use the letter below to forbid smart meter installation (or modify the letter to demand the meter be removed). From: Energy Customer's Name Street Address ...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JNFr_j6kdI - Cached
.Play Video
More results from youtube.com »
4.Smart Meters - Smart Meter News and Information
Smart Meters are an innovative and advanced utility meter that records a business or consumers energy, water or gas usage in real time and in greater detail than ...
www.smartmeters.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wd07OdxwQQQ&feature=relmfu
Have more if interested..
here's some info what do you think...
pass on you like..
What happened in Freetopia? A video fable about modern America - NaturalNews.tv
YouTube - Republic vs Democracy
DRIVERS LICENSE VS RIGHT TO TRAVEL
SUI JURIS - THE TRUTH IN THE RECORD - Gaston
we need you help the elected and public employees, protect our consitutional rights and protect your own homes.
2012 could The end of the world is
Indivisual freedom,
Drones over US to get weaponized – so far, non-lethally
http://www.setyoufreenews.com/2012/05/24/drones-over-us-to-get-weaponized-so-far-non-lethally/
Radiation bay seafood ban extended
The Press Association
A ban on gathering seafood and bait from a beach which has radioactive particles present has been extended. It became an offence earlier this month for seafood to be collected at Dalgety Bay in Fife after an emergency order was put in place.
See all stories on this topic »
How public schools are nothing more than prisons that train slaves (video), page 1
YouTube - The American Dream By The Provocateur Network
YouTube - illegal seizure , 4th amendment violation
http://www.naturalnews.com/035032_hypochondriacs_drug_marketing_pills.html
What is treason, read on, if this could be applied what would you, do.
Juvenile Court have no constitutional bearing in the US - this is a court designed after Great Britain. We are living in the USA!
Our opinion of Immigration
US Code - Laws regarding Business
Gun Control Act of 1968 compared to the Gun Control Act of 1938
ABC News Report on gun confiscation
A example of Gun Confiscation In New Orleans
Peace Officer's statement from Australia
Is the Real ID for real?
Family Court and Parenting in New Zealand
Are Taxes Constitutional
and Fairly Enacted?
Watch America Freedom to Fascism
by Aaron Russo
Recommendations for political actions in 2009: "One Year Later but Still Not too Late" by LaRouche
Our Nations Principles in times of Economic downturn: "1932: Speak Not of Parties But of Universal Principles" by LaRouche
Immigration and the Future: "A First Hand View of the U. S Border" by State Rep. Jeff Krupf
Think this reporter is mad???
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1lJd2eLG0M&feature=youtu.be
Remember NAFTA
WAKE UP PEOPLE..your home is now with smartmeters
Austin Government Officials Seize Man’s Home because he had a Bunker
http://offgridsurvival.com/governmentofficialsseizebunkerhome/
New World Order's Population Reduction Plan Pt.2 [www.keepvid.com].mp4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1t81Edhl2Y&feature=related
Search results
1.1 MILLION pounds of Food on 3 acres. 10,000 fish 500 yards ...
Interested in aquaponics? Go here to grow up to 10 times the plants, in half the time, while the "fish" do all the work! http://thelocalwebsolution.com ...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=jV9CCxdkOng - Cached
.Play Video
The President who told the Truth about illuminati Vlad TV
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=20KDBELD20I&NR=1
SO I could LOSE MY HOME TO THE ELECTED AND PUBLIC EMPLOYEES UNIONS MEMBERS FOR NOT PAYING MY TAXES, WHEN I WAS DISABLED ON A COMMERCIAL EMPLOYMENT ON THE JOB. SO WHERE'S THE FINDING MONEY THAT HAS BEEN PAID FOR ON ALL THREE SIDES IN TAX REVENUE,INSURANCE premiums,{WHEN AN NATIONAL DISASTER HAPPENS HOW COME PREMIUMS GO UP. TO PAY FOR WHAT HAS ALREADY BEEN PAID FOR HOW COME COMPANY'S US TO GET 2-4 PCT, GET MUCH MORE TODAY.,NON-PROFIT DEDUCTIONS,FEDERAL ,STATE,COUNTY AND CITY, WHEN WAS PROPERTY TAXES LAW, BY ALL ACCOUNTS OR VOLUNTEER, WHEN DID THE WEST START PAYING PROPERTY TAXES IN THE LAST FORTY YEARS WHERE'S THE INTEREST PAID IN ALL LEGAL AMERICAN FUNDS TO PROTECT OUR CITY S TO OUR COUNTRY, FOR THE DISABLED AND LEGAL AMERICAN ELDERLY WORKING CLASS. SO WE DON'T BECOME HOMELESS;
I HAVE SEVENTEEN BLOWN DICES A CRUSHED LOWER BACK, TWO SPINAL SURGERY'S, OTHER SEVER MEDICAL. AN I'M denied the right to HUNTING FISHING OR TRAVEL, BECAUSE I'M DISABLED AND THOUS AROUND EVEN SAID IT WAS NOT MY FAULT FOR DOING SUCH A JOB, ANY PERSON INJURED ON THECOMMERCIAL JOB NO MATTER WHAT HAS RIGHTS 1914, ARE WE GO BACK TO THE ROMAN DAYS OF SLAVERY, OUR THEIR ANY SIMILARITIES HERE. No coverage from the system/
I ENTITLE TO MY CONSTITUTION RIGHTS AS YOU ARE.
THAT GOD FOR THE UNITED STATES CONDITIONAL AND COMMON LAWS
SEPARATION FROM CHURCH AND STATE.
http://www.patriotnetwork.info/Citizens_rule_book.htm
AS SOME WOULD SAY INCLUDING TALK SHOW HOST GOD GAVE US THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF GOD GIVEN RIGHTS FREEDOM WITH OUT PAYING THE PRIVILEGE TO HAVE WATER AND FOOD SO WHAT IS IT.
AS I UNDERSTAND GOD DIED FOR OUR ,YOUR ,SINS.
CITY'S OUR RAISING WATER RATES 500% WHERE'S , I HAVE REQUESTED THERE ACCOUNTS,WHERES IS ALL LEGAL AMERICAN MONEY PAID INTO THE SYSTEM FOR THE LAST FIFTY YEARS, DID THE BOARDS HAVE A LEGAL RIGHT TO SIGN FOR SUCH DEBT. NO THEY OUR RESPONSIBLE FOR DEBT JUST LIKE YOU ARE FOR YOURS TO MY UNDERSTANDING ONE HAS TO SIGN FOR DEBT, SO MUCH MORE I HAVE TESTIFIED AT NUMEROUS PUBLIC HEARINGS AROUND OREGON STATE OVER THE YEARS..
Romans 13:1-7
New International Version bible (NIV)
Submission to Governing Authorities
13 Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. 2 Consequently, whoever rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves. 3 For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong. Do you want to be free from fear of the one in authority? Then do what is right and you will be commended. 4 For the one in authority is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for rulers do not bear the sword for no reason. They are God’s servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer. 5 Therefore, it is necessary to submit to the authorities, not only because of possible punishment but also as a matter of conscience.
6 This is also why you pay taxes, for the authorities are God’s servants, who give their full time to governing. 7 Give to everyone what you owe them: If you owe taxes, pay taxes; if revenue, then revenue; if respect, then respect; if honor, then honor.
I tesafied agaisnt the senaete as well,
As to my recalection ,, Sen. Peter Courtney,,D, Said were a domarecy let the voters deside,.
http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/greetings-from-the-peoples-republic-of-oregon/blog-249851/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SD5-xfbcJI&feature=share
History of the Bible (Full Documentary)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqarwCKiIe8&feature=related
What do treason mean
Treason - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In individual...|
List of people...|
Related offences|
See also
In law, treason is the crime that covers some of the more extreme acts against one's sovereign or nation. Historically, treason also covered the murder of specific ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treason - Cached
Obama Loses Temper! "Are you Serious?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWhkgRBMzWQ&feature=fvwrel
Public Notice of TREASON
Sovereign Citizen Plaintiff
vs.
Accused
Treason against the United States of America
Violation of Your Sworn OATH of Office
You. as a Public Official, who has Sworn an Oath of Office, to Defend,
Protect, and Preserve the Constitution for the united States of
America against all enemies, both Foreign and Domestic, as well as its
Citizens, and to Honor it as the Supreme Law of the Land; defined by
Law as one owing Allegiance to the United States of America in your
position of Public Trust.
You failure to honor your Sworn Oath (documented by the within named
Plaintiff) fulfills the requirements of an Act of Treason as cited in
the United States Constitution, to wit: "in levying war against them
[the States and "We the People"], or, in adhering to their enemies,
giving them aid and comfort."
TREASON, by law, is
punishable by the Death Penalty.
Thus, any violation one's Oath of Office, by those Sworn and paid to
Honor the Constitution for the united States of America, is an overt
act of treason against "We the People."
Such acts are in contempt of the law, affecting other Public Servants
who may 'go along - to get along,' leading to the loss of confidence
in Government and eventual corruption in Government. If lawlessness
continues un-reported and un-punished, tyranny becomes king and
Government the Master.
If enough citizens, patriots, and Christians understand this
traditional love for Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness,
traditional in America - this will not happen.
You. (the Accused, are now put on notice by this letter, that your
act(s) of Treason are now part of the Public Record.
This letter is delivered to you, the Accused, showing that there is a
legal file being prepared for your prosecution. The responsibility to
document vour Act(s) of Treason rests with the Plaintiff. The
Plaintiff has a legal obligation to make your Act(s) of Treason known
to Government Officials. (18 USC Section 4) and the moral
responsibility to post this Notice in public places near your piace of
business, or in the areas of your residence, as a Public Service. All
local media will, also, in this process, be fully informed.
For vour information, this letter will be entered as a Court Exhibit,
in addition to other evidence, to document your Act(s) of Treason
against "We the People," when formal charges and proceedings are filed
against you. An Act of Treason against one individual, by another - is
an act against all American Citizens.
Signature:______________________
Address:_______________________________________________________
Date:___________
City, State:_____________________________________
STATE OF:
COUNTY OF:
1st witness:__________________________________
2nd witness:__________________________________
3rd witness:__________________________________
I,___________________, a Notary Public, an officer authorized by law
to administer oaths, do hereby certify that the foregoing four
signatories,
1._____________________________2.__________________________________
3.________________________________________
4.___________________________________
did appear before me and sign these documents.
DATED this__________day of_____________, 200
Notary Public:__________________________ in and for the County of
______________, State of ________.
My Commission expires:__________
BLOCKBUSTER REVELATION! - MINI Documentary - Illegal Obama "Propped Up" By Congress!
http://www.youtube.com:80/watch?v=H3aCfR8rmrw
http://gulagbound.com/29684/maritime-attack-law-of-the-sea-treaty-in-us-senate-for-approval/#.T7WzVciD-lU
The Truth About Bottled Water - YouTube
The Truth About Bottled Water ... obsession but tap water is usually safer for you, and often better tasting too. Using a hidden camera, Penn & Teller ...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfPAjUvvnIc - Cached
.Play Video
More results from youtube.com »
truth about bottled water - YouTube
penn and teller reveal it all again ladies and gents so enjoy
www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdvJOF-2mm0 - Cached
.Play Video
District of Columbia Act of 1871 Defacto formed 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPkauG6qE8k
MARITIME ATTACK: Law of the Sea Treaty in US Senate for Approval
May 15, 2012, 1:13 pm By Arlen Williams
The U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs is once again diddling with the ultra-massive U.S. sovereignty and communitarian wealth giveaways known as the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Treaty (UNCLOS or LOST). Whenever one sees “communitarian,” one may think “global communist.”
Neo-Marxist Saboteur Barack Obama‘s State and Defense Departments (including numerous compromised, NATO-head officers) are pressuring the Senate to adopt this travesty after years of resistance dating back to Ronald Reagan’s presidency. If the committee goes forward with it, they could choose either of two paths: 1. the honorable and traditional congressional method of holding hearings, or 2. “fast-track” it, in order to slip voting through with as little light of day or time for the People to react, as possible.
The Senate is still Harry Reid’s crypto-Marxist Senate, and this committee’s chairman is John Kerry, so LOST may pop up for a vote like a rapist plunging from behind the bushes in the dark, within the next few days.
Recent and upcoming reports may be found at Heritage.org: “heritageaction.com/tag/law-of-the-sea-treaty.” Gulag Bound will also continue to monitor: “gulagbound.com/tag/un-convention-on-the-law-of-the-sea-unclos-or-lost.”
For other sources, see in Investors.com, “Obama Seeks Sovereignty Surrender Via LOST Treaty,” May 8, 2012; in U.S. News & World Report, “Kill the Law of the Sea Treaty,” May 10; and at Breitbart, Daily Caller, or American Thinker, “American Sovereignty: LOST at Sea?” by Ken Blackwell and Bob Morrison, May 14.
Perhaps the most thorough of the most recent articles is found at Liberty News Online, “The Creature from the Ocean’s Floor – the Law of the Sea Treaty,” by John W. Wallace, May 15. We hope Mr. Wallace does not mind our excerpting it at length.
The Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) was first conceived in the early 1980’s by the United Nations as a method for them to gain control of most of the activities on, over, and beneath the ocean’s surface. The fundamental premise of the Law of the Sea Treaty is that the resources on the ocean’s floor belong to all of the people of the world and those resources should be protected and controlled by an international organization like the United Nations. Although that may sound like a noble goal, in order to achieve this goal, the United Nations has created a multinational, bureaucratic creature called the International Seabed Authority (“ISA”) and charged this entity with regulating and controlling the world’s mineral resources in the oceans.
When President Reagan was president, he objected to several of the treaty’s provisions that would have resulted in surrendering our nation’s sovereignty and refused to sign it, but that didn’t stop the proponents of world government and the New World Order. In 1994, the “progressives (a nice term used to describe communists) at the United Nations decided to keep moving forward with their plans by creating a diversion they called an “Agreement of Implementation” that was supposed to address the concerns of the United States and other industrialized nations. It didn’t change anything. This new agreement was all smoke and mirrors, but our Oxford educated, globalist president Bill Clinton signed it anyway. The Senate, however, refused to ratify it, as required by the U.S. Constitution.
Proposed regulations in the new Law of the Sea Treaty will require private companies that want to conduct exploration and mining operations in international waters to submit substantial application fees to the UN’s International Seabed Authority (ISA), which in turn would allow the ISA to use these application fees to partially pay for its own mining efforts through its own mining subsidy, called the Enterprise. Corporations from member nations operating in international waters would have to pay annual fees and even be taxed to pay a percentage of their profits to the ISA. These corporations would also be expected to share their mining and navigational technology with third world countries to ensure that opportunities aren’t restricted to more technologically advanced. This is insane. The decision to grant or to withhold mining permits in international waters would now be decided by unelected, globalist bureaucrats at the United Nation’s International Seabed Authority (ISA).
The Treaty would essentially give the United Nations, a notoriously corrupt, anti-American, anti-capitalist and un-democratic organization, the power to assert control over 70% of the earth’s surface.
Using the regulations issued by the ISA, the United Nations would now be given the power to levy international fees and taxes on American companies. Mining approvals would be highly politicized and could discriminate against American operators. The United Nations would be given the power to regulate ocean research, exploration, fishing, marine environmental protection and navigation. They could even impose production quotas and licensing requirements on American fishermen operating in international waters.
The United Nations, through the ISA, would be given the power to create an international court system to render and enforce its judgments! This new system would lie outside the jurisdiction of the U.S. legal system and the U.S. Constitution, leaving American citizens and businesses at the mercy of international tribunals whose corrupt UN bureaucrats could subject them to Sharia Law or other non-Western legal traditions.
The Treaty calls for prosperous member nations like the United States to provide financial and technical assistance not only to developing countries, but also to “people who have not attained full independence or other self-governing status” (codeword for groups such as the Palestinians).
The Treaty would do irreparable harm to U.S. military and intelligence operations and would force the United States to hand over proprietary technology to less developed third-world countries, many of whom are actively hostile to U.S. interests. Giving up the U.S. Navy’s long established primary mission of “maintaining freedom of the seas for all” and handing it over to a historically corrupt organization like the United Nations should be unthinkable.
The most important objection concerns Article 314 of The Law of the Sea Treaty (located in Part XVII) that empowers the LOST member Assembly, dominated by nations of the developing world, to amend the terms of the treaty over the objection of any individual member state. In other words, the terms of the treaty could be changed significantly and the United States would have to abide by those changes without the U.S. Senate having the opportunity to consent to the changes. This undermines U.S. sovereignty and is clearly unconstitutional.
The Law of the Sea Treaty creates a new United Nations’ worldwide bureaucracy that will create a whole new restrictive system of destructive environmental regulations that would be costly and counter-productive to American businesses, while at the same time, handing over the hard-earned, American taxpayer money to many of our enemies.
The socialists, Marxists, globalists and other supporters of the New World Order keep pushing for this treaty. Senator Harry Reid has indicated that he might reintroduce the treaty in the Senate for a vote in the near future and Barack Obama, our socialist President, who is a long term advocate of the Law of the Sea Treaty, has indicated that he will sign it if passed by the Senate.
The Coalition to Preserve American Sovereignty has brought an open letter to the senate, coordinated by Frank Gaffney, with the signatures of nineteen notables. This letter is featured in The Minority Report, which would also expose a separate, false-hood front group calling itself The American Sovereignty Campaign, purporting itself as pro-sovereignty while lobbying for LOST. The American Sovereignty Campaign – interesting – almost as if someone’s email or telephone conversations were caught. Oh well. It is a common practice for immoral Marxists and other ideological movements sponsored by the kleptocratic central bank complex to either attempt to control their opposition, or to set up an operation posing as a faction of it.
Sen. Kerry summoning a political jiu-jitsu pose
It is again time for immediate and forcefully amassed communications to U.S. Senators of all kinds, even their numerous Fabianists. A two-thirds majority is required to approve a treaty, but these people are being heavily pressured by the kleptocracy and their globalist co-conspirators.
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations members
Leaders
John F. Kerry (MA-D) Chairman
Richard G. Lugar (IN-R) Ranking Member – rank globalist traitor on the GOP side, exiting by recent popular vote
Democrat majority members
Barbara Boxer (CA)
Robert Menendez (NJ)
Benjamin L. Cardin (MD)
Robert P. Casey (PA) – isn’t he okay? isn’t he pro-life? </sarcasm>
Jim Webb (VA) – the conflicted one
Jeanne Shaheen (NH)
Christopher Coons (DE) – self described former “bearded Marxist;” now shaves
Richard J. Durbin (IL) – designated neo-Marxist spinmeister following in Joseph Biden’s footsteps, often comic, always dangerous
Tom Udall (NM)
Republican minority members (to be contacted and watched with no less diligence)
Bob Corker (TN)
James E. Risch (ID)
Marco Rubio (FL)
James M. Inhofe (OK)
Jim DeMint (SC)
Johnny Isakson (GA)
John Barrasso (WY)
Mike Lee (UT)
Another response, though typically of lesser impact, a petition to the senate is being sponsored by conservative PAC, Right March.
Following is notable and extensive analysis from the recent past.
After public anger over a provision in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that allows indefinite detention of American citizens without accusation or trial, Congress has paraded a "new" version that is supposed to overcome this danger. [However, a close reading of the bill reveals that nothing has changed except the addition of assuring phrases without substance. It proves that those who drafted this bill are using deliberate deception.]
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/11381-ndaa-2013-headed-to-full-house-smith-amash-amendment-offered
NDAA 2013 Headed to Full House; Smith/Amash Amendment Offered
After a US federal court blocked NDAA indefinite detention of US citizens the House of Representatives passes the 2013 NDAA which reauthorizes it.
http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2012/05/18/ndaa-2013-congress-reauthorizing-jailing-citizens-trial-134971/
http://gulagbound.com/29684/maritime-attack-law-of-the-sea-treaty-in-us-senate-for-approval/#.T7WzVciD-lU
MARITIME ATTACK: Law of the Sea Treaty in US Senate for Approval
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=zXGi-NnVnHM
ACORN Changes Their Name To SATAN
CPS Drugs 4 Year Olds - Baby LK Report For May 20th 2012
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYmUBDwHKdI&feature=g-all-u
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=7r0c_kfdwQU
Fluoridation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=fvwp&v=hF1akWl1k68&NR=1
Chemtrails
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t52Y_qEyoyo&feature=related
wake up stop the elected and public employees who don't protect your oathkeepers.org
our people alive our a computer.
birds and Fish are now Dying all Around the World | EUTimes.net
UPDATED on March 09, 2011 Massive fish deaths are back! NEW MASS DEATHS reported in California! The story was published on January 6. Update 1 was
www.eutimes.net/2011/01/birds...dying-all-around-the-world - Cached
More reports of dead birds and fish from around the world
More reports of dead birds and fish from around the world ... said penguins, petrels and other seabirds were already dying in large ...
www.newsnet5.com/dpp/weather/weather_news/reports-of... - Cached
History of the Bible (Full Documentary)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqarwCKiIe8&feature=related
Image Detail
TO TRAVEL IS A RIGHT,
YOU DO NOT NEED A GOVERNMENT GRANTED "PRIVILEGE"
you will need to make the hedder but SAY NOTHING BUT PROVE ME GUILTY
1. The issue is whether this Sovereign is required to obey the
provisions in the state statutes. It is the contention of this
Sovereign that because he is a Free and Natural Person who has given
up none of his "RIGHTS." That the legislative enactments and statutes
do not apply to him. It is also the contention of this Sovereign that
travels upon the streets or highways in any state of America by this
Sovereign is an unalienable "RIGHT." Being this, is not subject to
regulation or legislation by any "State" of the united States.
2. Let us first consider the contention of this Sovereign that
travels upon the streets or highways in America is a "RIGHT." Various
courts have ruled on this issue. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled:
2.1 The "RIGHT" to travel is a part of the liberty of which the
Citizen cannot be deprived without due process of the law under the
5th Amendment. (Emphasis added) See: Kent v. Dulles, 357 U.S. 116,
125
3. The Supreme Court of Wisconsin stated in 1909:
3.1 The term "public highway," in its broad popular sense, includes
toll roads -- any road which the public have a "RIGHT" to use even
conditionally, though in a strict legal sense it is restricted to
roads which are wholly public. (Emphasis added). See: Weirich v.
State, 140 Wis. 98.
4. The Supreme Court of the State of Illinois ruled:
4.1 Even the legislature has no power to deny to a Citizen
the "RIGHT" to travel upon the highway and transport his property in
the ordinary course of his business or pleasure, through this "RIGHT"
might be regulated in accordance with the public interest and
convenience. (Emphasis added) See: Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago,
169 N.E. 22
5. "Regulated" here means traffic safety enforcement, stop lights,
sign, etc., NOT a privilege that requires permission, i.e.;
licensing, mandatory insurance, vehicle registration, etc..
6. PRIVILEGE OR RIGHT?
6.1 The use of the highway for the purpose of travel and
transportation is NOT a mere PRIVILEGE, but a "COMMON AND FUNDAMENTAL
RIGHT" of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be
deprived. (Emphasis added) See: Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago,
supra; Ligare v. Chicago, 28 N.E. 934; Boone v. Clark, 214 S.W. 607;
American Jurisprudence 1st Ed., Highways 163
6.2 Citizen's "RIGHT" to travel upon public highways includes right
to use usual conveyances of time, including horse-drawn carriage, or
automobile, for ordinary purposes of life and business. (Emphasis
added) See: Thompson v. Smith (Chief of Police), 154 S.E. 579, 580
6.3 The "RIGHT" of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and
to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by
automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or
permit at will, but a "COMMON RIGHT" which he has under the "RIGHT"
to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. (Emphasis added) See:
Thompson v. Smith, supra.
7. It could not be stated more conclusively that Sovereigns of the
states have a "RIGHT" to travel, without approval or restriction,
(license), and that this "RIGHT" is protected under the U.S.
Constitution. After all, who do the roadways belong to anyway? The
People-At-Large. Here are other court decisions that expound the same
facts:
7.1 .... [T]he streets and highways belong to the public, for the use
of the public in the ordinary and customary manner. See: Hadfield v.
Lundin, 98 Wn. 657; 168 P. 516;
7.2 All those who travel upon, and transport their property upon, the
public highways, using the ordinary conveyance of today, and doing so
in the usual and ordinary course of life and business. See: Hadfield,
supra; State v. City of Spokane, 109 Wn. 360; 186 P. 864.
7.3 The "RIGHT" of the Citizen to travel upon the highways and to
transport his property thereon, in the ordinary course of life and
business, differs radically and obviously from that of one who makes
the highways his place of business and uses it for private gain ....
(Emphasis added) See: State v. City of Spokane, supra.
7.4 ...... [F]or while a Citizen has the "RIGHT" to travel upon the
public highways and to transport his property thereon, that "RIGHT"
does not extend to the use of the highways, either in whole or in
part, as a place of business for private gain. For the latter
purposes no person has a vested right to use the highways of the
state, but is a MERE PRIVILEGE or license which the legislature may
grant or withhold at its discretion .... (Emphasis added). See:
Hadfield, supra; State v. Johnson, 243 P. 1073; Cummins v. Jones, 155
P. 171; Packard v. Banton, 44 S.Ct. 257, 264 U.S. 140 and other cases
too numerous to mention.
8. The Washington State Supreme Court stated:
8.1 I am not particularly interested about the rights of haulers by
contract, or otherwise, but I am deeply interested in the "RIGHTS" of
the public to use the public highways freely for all lawful purposes.
(Emphasis added). See: Robertson v. Department of Public Works, 180
Wash. 133 at 139
9. The Supreme Court of the State of Indiana ruled in 1873:
9.1 It is not the amount of travel, the extent of the use of a
highway by the public that distinguishes it from a private way or
road. It is the "RIGHT" to so use or travel upon it, not its
exercise. (Emphasis added) See: ? Ind 455, 461
10. 11 American Jurisprudence 1st, has this to say:
10.1 The "RIGHT" of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways
and to transport his property thereon, by horse-drawn carriage,
wagon, or automobile, is NOT a mere PRIVILEGE which may be permitted
or prohibited at will, but a "COMMON RIGHT" which he has under his
right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Under this
constitutional guarantee one may, therefore, under normal conditions,
travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public
places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner,
neither interfering with, not disturbing another's "RIGHTS," he will
be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct.
(Emphasis added) See: 11 American Jurisprudence 1st., Constitutional
Law, 329, page 1123
11. The Supreme Court of the State of Georgia ruled:
11.1 In this connection it is well to keep in mind that, while the
public has an absolute "RIGHT" to the use of the streets for their
primary purpose, which is for travel, the use of the streets from the
purpose of parking automobiles is a privilege, and not a "RIGHT"; and
the privilege must be accepted with such reasonable burdens as the
city may place as conditions to the exercise of the privilege.
(Emphasis added). See: Gardner v. City of Brunswick, 28 S.E.2d 135
12. The Supreme Court of the State of Colorado discussed the issue in
the following way in 1961.
12.1 The Constitution of the State of Colorado, Article II, §3
provides that:
All persons have certain natural, essential and unalienable "RIGHTS,"
among which may be reckoned the "RIGHT" .... of acquiring, possessing
and protecting property; ....
12.1.1 A motor vehicle is property and a person cannot be deprived of
property without due process of law. The term: "property," within
the meaning of the due process clause, includes the "RIGHT" to make
full use of the property which one has the unalienable "RIGHT" to
acquire.
12.1.2 Every Citizen has an unalienable "RIGHT" to make use of the
public highways of the state; every Citizen has full freedom to
travel from place to place in the enjoyment of life and liberty.
(Emphasis added). See: People v. Nothaus, 147 Colo. 210
13. The Constitution of the State of Idaho contains the words:
13.1 All men are by nature free and equal, and have certain
unalienable "RIGHTS," among which are ....; acquiring, possessing,
and protecting property .... (Emphasis added).
14. The words of the Idaho Constitution are to all intents and
purposes identical with those of the North Carolina Constitution. The
Constitution of the State of North Carolina, Article I, §1, states as
follows:
14.1 The equality and rights of persons. We hold it to be self-
evident that all persons are created equal; that they are endowed by
the Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are
life, liberty, the enjoyment of the fruits of their own labor, and
the pursuit of happiness.
14.2 To be that statutes which would deprive a citizen of the rights
of person or property without a regular trial, according to the
course and usage of common law, would not be the law of the land.
See: Hoke v. Henderson, 15 N.C. 15, 25 AM.Dec. 677
15. Since courts tend to be consistent in their rulings, it would be
expected the Idaho Supreme Court would rule in the same manner as the
North Carolina Supreme Court.
16. Other authorities have arrived at similar conclusions:
16.1 The Constitution for the United States of America, Amendment 9:
16.1.1 The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall
not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
17. The Constitution of the State of North Carolina, Article I, §36:
17.1 Other rights of the people. The enumeration of rights in this
Article shall not be construed to impair or deny others retained by
the people.
18. I demand all of my other rights, including the right to travel
upon the public highways and byways in the United States of America.
19. The Constitution of the State of North Carolina, Article I, §2:
19.1 Sovereignty of the people. All political power is vested in and
derived from the people; all government of right originates from the
people, is founded upon their will only, and is instituted solely for
the good of the whole.
20. As member of the Sovereignty of the people, I not only am
entitled to use the highways and byways in the United States of
America, I have an inalienable right to use the highways and byways.
20.1 Highways are public roads which every Citizen has a "RIGHT" to
use. (Emphasis added). See: 3 Angel Highways 3.
20.2 A highway is a passage, road, or street, which every Citizen has
a "RIGHT" to use. (Emphasis added). See: Bouvier's Law Dictionary.
21. I have emphasized the word "RIGHT" because it is a common point
among the authorities listed. The Idaho Code even joins in this
common point:
21.1 49-301 (13) Street or highway. -- The entire width between
property lines of every way or place of whatever nature when any part
thereof is open to the use of the public, as a matter of "RIGHT," for
purposes of vehicular traffic. (Emphasis added.) See: Idaho Code.
22. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that:
22.1 Undoubtedly the "RIGHT" of locomotion, the "RIGHT" to remove
from one place to another according to inclination, is an attribute
of personal liberty, and the "RIGHT," ordinarily, of free transit
from or through the territory of any State is a "RIGHT" secured by
the Fourteenth Amendment and by other provisions of the Constitution.
(Emphasis added). See: Williams v. Fears, 343 U.S. 270, 274
23. Thus, there can be little doubt that, when this Sovereign travels
upon the streets or highways in North Carolina, he does so as a
matter of "RIGHT" and not privilege. The authority for such travel is
described variously as a "RIGHT," a "COMMON RIGHT," an "ABSOLUTE
RIGHT," an "UNALIENABLE RIGHT," and a "RIGHT" protected by the
Constitution of the United States. Let us then examine the importance
of these terms to this Sovereign by defining their meaning.
23.1 "RIGHT" -- In law,
(a) an enforceable claim or title to any subject matter whatever;
(b) one's claim to something out of possession;
(c) a power, prerogative, or privilege, as when the word is applied
to a corporation. See: Webster Unabridged Dictionary
23.2 "RIGHT" -- As relates to the person, "RIGHTS" are absolute or
relative; absolute "RIGHTS," such as every individual born or living
in this country (and not an alien enemy) is constantly clothed with,
and relate to his own personal security of life, limbs, body, health,
and reputation; or to his personal liberty; "RIGHTS" which attach
upon every person immediately upon his birth in the kings dominion,
and even upon a slave the instant he lands within the same. (Emphasis
added). See: 1 Chitty Pr. 32.
23.3 "RIGHT" -- A legal "RIGHT," a constitutional "RIGHT" means
a "RIGHT" protected by the law, by the constitution, but government
does not create the idea of "RIGHT" or original "RIGHTS"; it
acknowledges them ..... (Emphasis added). See: Bouver's Law
Dictionary, 1914, p. 2916
23.4 Absolute "RIGHT" -- Without any condition or incumbrance as an
absolute bond, simplex obligatio, in distinction from a conditional
bond; an absolute estate, one that is free from all manner of
conditions or incumbrance .. A rule is said to be absolute when, on
the hearing, it is confirmed. (Emphasis added). See: Bouvier's Law
Dictionary.
23.5 Unalienable -- A word denoting the condition of those things,
the property in which cannot be lawfully transferred from one person
to another. See: Bouvier's Law Dictionary.
24. It shows from these definitions that the State has an obligation
to acknowledge the "RIGHTS" of this Sovereign to travel on the
streets or highways in North Carolina. Further, the State has the
duty to refrain from interfering with this "RIGHT" and to protect
this "RIGHT" and to enforce the claim of this Sovereign to it.
25. Now if this Sovereign has the absolute "RIGHT" to move about on
the streets or highways, does that "RIGHT" include the "RIGHT" to
travel in a vehicle upon the streets or highways? The Supreme Court
of the State of Texas has made comments that are an appropriate
response to this question.
25.1 Property in a thing consists not merely in its ownership and
possession, but in the unrestricted "RIGHT" of use, enjoyment and
disposal. Anything which destroys any of these elements of property,
to that extent destroys the property itself. The substantial value of
property lies in its use. If the "RIGHT" of use be denied, the value
of the property is annihilated and ownership is rendered a
barren "RIGHT." Therefore, a law which forbids the use of a certain
kind of property, strips it of an essential attribute and in actual
result proscribes its ownership. (Emphasis added). See: Spann v. City
of Dallas, 235 S.W. 513
26. These words of the Supreme Court of Texas are of particular
importance in Idaho because the Idaho Supreme Court quoted the
Supreme Court of Texas and used these exact words in rendering its
decision in the case of O'Conner v. City of Moscow, 69 Idaho 37. The
Supreme Court of Texas went on to say further;
26.1 To secure their property was one of the great ends for which men
entered into society. The "RIGHT" to acquire and own property, and to
deal with it and use it as the owner chooses, so long as the use
harms nobody, is a natural "RIGHT." It does not owe its origin to
constitutions. It existed before them. It is a part of the Citizen's
natural liberty -- an _expression of his freedom, guaranteed as
inviolate by every American Bill of "RIGHTS." (Emphasisadded). See:
Spann supra.
27. PROPERTY
27.1 Bouvier's Law Dictionary defines;
27.1.1 Property -- The ownership of property implies its use in the
prosecution of any legitimate business which is not a nuisance in
itself. See: In re Hong Wah, 82 Fed. 623
28. The United States Supreme Court states:
28.1 The Federal Constitution and laws passed within its authority
are by the express terms of that instrument made the supreme law of
the land. The Fourteenth Amendment protects life, liberty, and
property from invasion by the States without due process of law.
28.2 Property is more than the mere thing which a person owns. It is
elementary that it includes the "RIGHT" to acquire, use and dispose
of it. (Emphasis added). See: Buchanan v. Warley, 245 U.S. 60, 74
29. These authorities point out that the "RIGHT" to own property
includes the "RIGHT" to use it. The reasonable use of an automobile
is to travel upon the streets or highways on which this Sovereign has
an absolute "RIGHT" to use for the purposes of travel. The
definitions in Title 49 Chapter 3 of the Idaho Code positively
declare the "RIGHT" of this Sovereign to travel in a vehicle upon the
streets or highways in Idaho.
30. MOTOR VEHICLE OR VEHICLE?
30.1 Motor Vehicle -- Motor vehicle means a vehicle which is self-
propelled or which is propelled by electric power obtained from
overhead trolley wires, but not operated upon rails. See: Idaho Code
49-301 (6)
30.2 Vehicle -- Vehicle means a device in, upon, or by which any
person or property is or may be transported or drawn upon a public
highway, excepting devices moved by human power or horse drawn or
used exclusively upon stationary rails or tracks. See: Idaho Code 49-
301 (14)
30.3 Street or Highway -- Street or Highway means the entire width
between property lines of every way or place of whatever nature when
any part thereof is open to the use of the public, as a matter
of "RIGHT," for purposes of vehicular traffic. (Emphasis added). See:
Idaho Code 49-301 (13)
30.4 The term "Motor Vehicle" may be so used as to include only those
self-propelled vehicles which are used on highways primarily for
purposes of "transporting" persons and property from place to place.
(Emphasis added). See: 60 Corpus Juris Secundum §1, Page 148;
Ferrante Equipment Co. v. Foley Machine Co., N.J., 231 A.2d 208, 211,
49 N.J. 432
30.5 It seems obvious that the entire Motor Transportation Code and
the definition of motor vehicle are not intended to be applicable to
all motor vehicles but only to those having a connection with
the "transportation" of persons or property. (Emphasis added). See:
Rogers Construction Co. v. Hill, Or., 384 P.2d 219, 222, 235 Or. 352
30.6 "Motor vehicle" means a vehicle, machine, tractor, trailer, or
semitrailer propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used on a
highway in "transportation," or a combination determined by the
Commission, but does not include a vehicle, locomotive, or car
operated only on a rail, or a trolley bus operated by electric power
from a fixed overhead wire, and providing local
passenger "transportation" similar to street-railway service.
(Emphasis added) See: Transportation, Title 49, U.S.C.A. §10102 (17)
The Constitutions of the United States and the State of North
Carolina guarantees this Sovereign the "RIGHT" to own property. The
Supreme Courts of North Carolina and Texas have affirmed that
the "RIGHT" to own property includes the "RIGHT" to use it while its
use harms nobody. If that property is an automobile, it is included
in the definitions of vehicle and motor vehicle in the Idaho Code
Title 49 Chapter 3. And in the same Idaho Code Chapter, streets or
highways are defined as the place where vehicles are used by the
public as a matter of "RIGHT." Thus it shows that this Sovereign has
the "RIGHT" to use a vehicle on the streets or highways in North
Carolina.
31. Now if this Sovereign has the "RIGHT" to use a vehicle on the
streets or highways in North Carolina, to what extent can the State
of North Carolina regulate or diminish that "RIGHT?" There are some
who maintain that specific performance is required of every Sovereign
who uses a vehicle upon the streets or highways in North Carolina.
Let us examine this contention in detail.
Contract?
32. Specific performance is a term used to designate an action in
equity in which a party to a contract asks the court to order the
other party to carry out the contract which he has failed or refused
to perform. Thus, if specific performance is expected, a contract
must exist. The question then becomes: What are the terms of the
contract and when was it executed and by whom? Since specific
performance seems expected of every user of a vehicle on the streets
or highways in North Carolina, the user of a vehicle seems one of the
parties to the supposed contract. And since the State seems the party
demanding specific performance, the State is the other party to the
contract. So the supposed contract exists between the user of a
vehicle and the State of North Carolina. When was this contract
executed and what are its' terms? Some contend that when a user of a
vehicle avails himself of the "privilege" of driving on public
thoroughfares that he enters a contract with the State that requires
him to abide with all the laws in the North Carolina General
Statutes. Others contend that the contract is executed when a
driver's license is obtained. We need now to figure out what is a
contract.
33. A contract may be defined as an agreement enforceable in court
between two or more parties, for a sufficient consideration to do or
not to do some specified thing or things. Thus, a contract has four
essential features:
33.1 It must be an agreement.
33.2 There must be at least two parties to the contract.
33.3 There must be a consideration.
33.4 There must be an obligation or thing to be done.
34. Several types of contracts exist, but all must contain the
essential features listed. Contracts can be classified under three
principal categories:
34.1 Express
34.2 Implied
34.3 Quasi
35. Quasi contracts, while being called contracts are not really
contracts, will not be considered in this discussion of contracts but
will be considered in a separation section later.
Unilateral & Bilateral Contracts
36. There can also be unilateral and bilateral contracts that is
presumed can exist under some or all the above headings. Let us
examine each above types of contracts to see if the license obtained
by this Sovereign falls under any of the categories of contract.
36.1 An express contract is one in which the agreement of the parties
is fully stated in words, and it may be either written or oral, or
partly written and partly oral. See: Bergh Business Law 30
36.2 A true implied contract is an agreement of the parties arrived
at from their acts and conduct viewed in the light of surrounding
circumstances, and not from their words either spoken or written.
Like an express contract, it grows out of the intention of the
parties to the transaction and there must be a meeting of the minds.
See: McKevitt et al v. Golden Age Breweries, Inc., 126 P.2d 1077
(1942)
36.3 License -- Authority to do some act or carry on some trade or
business, in its nature lawful but prohibited statute, except with
the permission of the civil authority or which would otherwise be
unlawful. See: Bouvier's Law Dict 37. With these definitions in mind,
let us examine a driver's license to see if it is a contract. The
driver's license itself is a small plastic card approximately 55
millimeters by 86 millimeters in size. It contains the words "North
Carolina Motor Vehicle Driver's license"; the name, address,
signature, and physical description of the user; a pair of
identifying numbers; a photograph; and the signature of the director
of the Department of Law Enforcement. Obviously, this cannot be an
express agreement because there are no statements to constitute an
agreement. Are there two parties to the "contract?" There are two
signatures, but both are copies, thus invalidating the "contract" so
there are no parties to the "contract." Is there a consideration?
What has the State given this Sovereign in return for this
Sovereign's obligation? Some may suggest that the State has given
this Sovereign the privilege of driving on the streets or highways in
North Carolina. But this Sovereign already has the "RIGHT" to drive
on the streets or highways in North Carolina, and the State cannot
require this Sovereign to give up a "RIGHT" to obtain a privilege.
38. An Iowa Statute that requires that every foreign corporation
named in it shall, as a condition for obtaining a permit to transact
business in Iowa, stipulate that it will not remove into the federal
court certain suits that it would by the laws of the United States
have a "RIGHT" to a permit dependant upon the surrender by the
foreign corporation of a privilege secured to it by the Constitution
and laws of the United States. Bouvier's Law Dictionary quoting
Barron v. Burnside, 121 U.S. 186:
38.1 The full significance of the clause law of the land is said by
Ruffin, C.J. to be that statutes that would deprive a Citizen of
the "RIGHTS" of person or property without a regular trial according
to the course and usage of the common law would not be the law of the
land. (Emphasis added). See: Bouvier's Law Dictionary quoting Hoke v.
Henderson, 15 N.C. 15, 25 AM Dec 677
39. It would be foolish for this Sovereign to exchange a "RIGHT" for
a privilege since it would mean giving up valuable property in
exchange for something having less value. Is it possible for this
Sovereign to do such a thing?
39.1 Consent -- In criminal Law. No act shall be deemed a crime if
done with the consent of the party injured, unless it be committed in
public, and is likely to provoke a breach of the peace, or tends to
the injury of a third party; provided no consent can be given which
will deprive the consenter of any unalienable "RIGHT." (Emphasis
added). See: Bouvier's Law Dictionary.
40. Thus, even if this Sovereign wanted to do so, he could not give
up his "RIGHT" to travel on the streets or highways in North Carolina
or exchange it for the privilege of having a driver's license. Thus,
in exchange for the supposed obligation of this Sovereign, the State
has given nothing. Thus, there is no consideration.
41. It may be contended that the seal on the driver's license is
sufficient consideration by the State. It is true that under the
common law, the question of consideration could not be raised
concerning a contract under seal. The seal provided conclusive
presumption of a consideration. Still, North Carolina has abolished
by statute the common law presumption of consideration and this
statute is binding upon all officers and employees of the State. So,
though a seal may be present, it is not evidence of consideration in
North Carolina. Of course, the document in question is a contrived
and copied document and lacks validity in any case as a contract.
42. As to an obligation, since the license contains no statement of
agreement, since there are no parties to any agreement, and since
there is no consideration, there can be no obligation. The driver's
license thus is not a contract since it fails to contain any of the
four essential features of a contract.
43. Can the driver's license be an implied contract? The same
elements must exist in an implied contract as exist in an express
contract. The only difference is that an implied contract is not
written or spoken and the elements of the contract are shown by the
acts and conduct of the parties involved. With respect to this
Sovereign, there was certainly no meeting of the minds else this
brief would not result. It was never the intention of this Sovereign
to give up constitutional "RIGHTS" to accept a privilege from the
State. Such an action would be ridiculous. This could only be done in
a socialistic state. There has been no implied agreement in a free
society. It is possible that there were two parties to the supposed
contract, the State and this Sovereign. There was no consideration in
the implied contract for the same reasons that there was no
consideration in the express contract.
44. An obligation is the thing to be done. It may be to pay money, to
do work, or to deliver goods; or it may be to refrain from doing
something that the person contracting had a "RIGHT" to do. Some may
say that the State was obligated to allow this Sovereign to drive on
the streets or highways in North Carolina and that this Sovereign was
obligated to obey all the Statutes contained in the North Carolina
General Statutes. It would be just as easy to say that the State
could not be obligated to allow this Sovereign to travel on the
streets or highways in North Carolina because they did not have
the "RIGHT" or the power to prevent him from doing so.
45. If the State cannot prevent this Sovereign from his travels on
the streets or highways in North Carolina, they do not have any
discretion in the matter and do not have the choice of whether to
obligate themselves or not. Thus, the obligation of the State cannot
be to grant this Sovereign the privilege of travel on the streets or
highways in North Carolina. The obligation of the State cannot be to
refrain from prohibiting this Sovereign from his travel on the
streets or highways in North Carolina since the State did not have
the "RIGHT" to do this at first.
46. It is the contention of this Sovereign that the only obligation
that this Sovereign incurs when using a vehicle upon the streets or
highways in North Carolina is the Common Law obligation to refrain
from any act that causes another person to lose life, liberty, or
property. In complying with this obligation, this Sovereign does
comply with many Statutes in the North Carolina General Statutes
since they are, for the most part, only common sense rules by which
this Sovereign avoids doing damage to others.
47. Still, this acquiescence to some Statutes of The North Carolina
General Statutes should not be construed as evidence of a contractual
obligation by this Sovereign. Neither should it be construed as
acquiescence to all the Statutes of the North Carolina General
Statutes or to any of them always. Instead, it is merely evidence of
a want of this Sovereign to travel safely and to do harm to no one.
48. Thus, the actions of this Sovereign do not supply unambiguous
evidence of a contract with the State. Instead, the actions can, with
equal weight, be said to be evidence of the fact that this Sovereign
was complying with Common Law requirement that he does harm to no
one. The driver's license is not an implied contract because there is
no consideration, there may be possibly be two parties, but there is
no consideration, and there is not clear evidence of an obligation.
Three of the four elements necessary for a contract are missing.
49. The question now becomes whether the driver's license application
is a contract. In completing this document, the applicant makes
several statements and signs the paper upon which these statements
are written under oath. The statements concern the identity, physical
description, address, ability and experience in operating a vehicle,
and one statement on the physical condition of the applicant. None of
the statements are as an agreement.
50. The application form contains the signature of the applicant and
the signature of the person taking the oath of the applicant. The
reverse side of the Application contains the results of a vision test
and rudimentary physical examination with the results of a driving
test. These results are signed by the examiner and not by the
applicant.
51. Thus the application takes the form of an Affidavit instead of a
contract. But let us see if the elements of a contract are present in
the application.
51.1 There is no agreement.
51.2 There are not two parties.
51.3 There is no consideration.
51.4 There is no obligation.
52. Since none of the necessary elements of a contract are present,
the application does not constitute a contract.
53. The only other document involved in obtaining a driver's license
is the document, part of which is copied to make the actual driver's
license. It contains, besides the information that is used in making
the driver's license, the results of a vision test conducted by the
driver's license examiner.
54. The applicant places his signature upon this form that is then
copied by some photographic process. Other material is added
including a photograph, signature of the Director of the Department
of Law Enforcement and the driver's license is made of this composite.
55. Thus the license itself cannot be a contract because it is a
contrived document. The form from which the driver's license is made
cannot be a contract because, again, none of the elements of a
contract are present. So if none of the documents executed by the
driver when obtaining a license is a contract, then no contract can
exist between the driver and the State as a result of obtaining a
driver's license.
56. But the idea that the driver's license is a contract with the
State is pervasive. It is a belief that is strongly held even by
people in high places. So let us examine the driver's license as if
it were a contract and see if it can withstand scrutiny. Not every
offer made by one party and accepted by the other creates a valid
contract. The outward form of a contract, either oral or written may
exist, and yet the circumstances may be such that no contract was in
reality created. Some circumstances that will cause an apparently
valid contract to be void are:
56.1 Mistake either mutual or unilateral.
56.2 Fraud.
56.3 Duress.
56.4 Alteration.
57. This Sovereign obtained a driver's license upon the
representation by the State that one's travel upon the streets or
highways of the United States of America was a privilege. This
Sovereign accepted this representation as true and did obtain a
driver's license.
57.1 It has been shown, still, that an individual's travel is
a "RIGHT" and not a privilege. Thus, a mutual mistake has been made,
and the "contract" is void. See: Deibel v. Kreiss, 50 N.E.2d 1000
(1943)
58. But the General Assembly of the State who passed the Statutes
contained in the North Carolina General Statutes are knowledgeable
persons, many of whom are lawyers, and they undoubtedly knew at the
time the law was passed that an individual's travel was a "RIGHT" and
not a privilege. If this were the case, then the mistake would be
unilateral. A unilateral mistake known to the other party is
sufficient grounds to void a contract.
59. Fraud
59.1 Fraud may consist in conduct, and may exist where there are no
positive representations, Silence where honesty requires speech, may
sometimes constitute fraud. The rule that a man may be silent and
safe is by no means a universal one. Where one contracting party
knows that the other is bargaining for one thing, he has no "RIGHT"
by silence to deceive him and suffer him to take an altogether
different thing, from that for which he bargains. (Emphasis added).
See: Parish v. Thurston, 87 Ind. 437 (1882)
60. If the driver's license is a contract, a case can be made for the
contention that it was an agreement obtained by the State by fraud.
60.1 Fraud is a generic term which embraces all the multifarious
means which human ingenuity can devise and are resorted to by one
individual to get any advantage over another. No definite and
invariable rule can be laid down as a general proposition defining
fraud, as it includes all surprise, trick, cunning, dissembling, and
unfair ways by which another is deceived. (Emphasis added). See:
Wells v. Zenz, 236 P. 485
61. With respect to contracts, the following statements can be made:
61.1 However, in the field of contracts, there are certain standard
tests for a claim of fraud which make it possible to define fraud, in
connection with a contract as any trick or artifice whereby a person
by means of a material misrepresentation creates an erroneous
impression of the subject matter of a proposed transaction, and
thereby induces another person to suffer damage computable in money.
The misrepresentation may result from a false statement, a
concealment, or a nondisclosure. The elements of a contractual fraud
are the following:
61.1.1 A material misrepresentation, created by a statement, a
concealment, or a nondisclosure.
61.1.2 An intention to defraud.
61.1.3 Reliance on the representation by the defrauded party.
61.1.4 Damage caused to the defrauded party as the result of his
acting upon the representation. See: Bergh Business Law p. 56.
62. In view of the many decisions by high courts, including the
Supreme Court of the United States, that one's travel is a "RIGHT"
and not a privilege, it would be hard to defend the proposition that
the General Assembly of the State of North Carolina was unaware of
these decisions, particularly since many legislators are and were
lawyers knowledgeable in such matters. In fact, when one considers
the definition of streets or highways in Sections of the North
Carolina General Statutes, the Evidence is conclusive that the
legislature knew and knows that ones travels is a "RIGHT."
63. Therefore, the statements in the North Carolina General Statutes
that a travel is a privilege and that a driver's license is necessary
before one can travel constitutes a material misrepresentation of
fact to this possessor of a driver's license. And since the
legislature is and was aware of the fact that an individual's travels
was not a privilege, but a "RIGHT," the statement that one's travels
is a privilege, when applied to this Sovereign, constitutes a willful
intention to deceive, and therefore, to defraud.
64. This Sovereign did rely upon the representations of the
legislature that an individual's travels was a privilege when he
obtained his driver's license, else he would not have obtained one.
65. This Sovereign did suffer damage as a result of his acting upon
the representation of the legislature at least to the extent of the
license fee.
66. In as much as all the necessary elements of fraud are present if
the driver's license is considered a contract, the "contract" is void.
DURESS
67. With respect to duress, Bergh, supra., supplies the following
definition:
67.1 A party must consent to a contract of his own free will; free
consent is an essential element of an agreement. Consequently, if he
is coerced into signing a contract by fear induced by a threat to
cause personal injury to himself or to some close relative, the
contract will not be a real agreement and it will be voidable at his
option. The threat of personal injury must be a threat to inflict
immediate bodily injury or to institute a criminal prosecution
against the person threatened or some close relative.
68. Since it was essential to this Sovereign in pursuing his
occupation of common "RIGHT" to use a vehicle upon the streets or
highways in North Carolina, and since the State of North Carolina
threatens to and does prosecute persons in criminal actions for not
possessing a driver's license, regardless of their status, this
Sovereign did obtain a driver's license under duress. If then the
driver's license is a contract, the contract is unenforceable and
invalid because of this duress.
69. With respect to alterations, Bergh, supra., has the following
comments:
69.1 Any material alteration in a written contract by one party
without the consent of the other party gives this latter the option
of treating the contract as discharged or enforcing it as it stood
before the alteration.
70. If the driver's license is a contract, it is a written contract,
at least to the extent that the Statutes of the North Carolina
General Statutes are written. Each time that the General Assembly
amends or modifies or adds to any of the Statutes of the North
Carolina General Statutes, the terms of the contract are changed.
Since this Sovereign then has the option of considering the contract
as discharged, he then chooses to do so as of the first change in the
North Carolina General Statutes following his application for a
driver's license.
71. If it is contended that the driver's license is an implied
contract, the "Statute of Frauds" comes into play. North Carolina has
enacted a "Statute of Frauds."
72. In the following cases the agreement is invalid, unless the same
or some note or memorandum of it, be in writing and subscribed by the
party charged, or by his agent. Evidence, therefore, of the agreement
cannot be received without the writing or secondary evidence of its
contents:
72.1 An agreement that by its terms is not to be performed within a
year from the making thereof.
72.2 .............
73. Since the term of the driver's license contract is so many years
and the contract is not written, the "Statute of Frauds" does apply
and the contract is unenforceable.
74. The discussion up to this point has been concerned with bilateral
contracts in which each party promises something to the other party.
Is it possible that the driver's license is a unilateral contract? A
unilateral contract is described as:
74.1 A unilateral contract is a one-sided contract in the sense that
only one side makes a promise, and the other side performs an act for
which the promise was given. See: Bergh, supra..
75. Since the act expected by the State is obedience to the Statutes
of the North Carolina General Statutes, what promise has the State
offered in exchange for this act? The only promise that the State
could make this Sovereign is the promise to allow him to travel on
the streets or highways in North Carolina. Since this Sovereign
already can do that as a matter of "RIGHT," the State can promise him
nothing. Thus there is no consideration and a unilateral contract
cannot exist.
76. Having shown that no contract exists between this Sovereign and
the State, let us examine the proposition that a quasi-contract
exists between this Sovereign and the State.
77. Quasi-Contract
77.1 A quasi-contract is an obligation springing from voluntary and
lawful acts of parties in the absence of any agreement. See:
Bouvier's Law Dictionary.
78. In order to establish the existence of a quasi-contractual
obligation it must be shown:
78.1 That the defendant has received a benefit from the Plaintiff.
78.2 That the retention of the benefit by the Defendant is
inequitable. See: Woodward Quasi Contracts 9.
79. Thus, if it is contended that this Sovereign must obey the
Statutes in the North Carolina General Statutes because of a quasi-
contract, it must be shown that this Sovereign has received a benefit
from the State. But one's travels on the streets or highways of the
State is not a benefit received from the State. It was a "RIGHT" that
attached to this Sovereign at the moment of his birth and cannot be
removed by the State. In this respect, no benefit has been received
from the State, and thus a quasi-contractual obligation cannot exist
with respect to this Sovereign.
80. It may be claimed that the Statutes of the North Carolina General
Statutes are made pursuant to the police powers of the State and that
every person in the State is obligated to obey them.
81. The police power is a grant of authority from the people to their
governmental agents for the protection of the health, the safety, the
comfort and the welfare of the public. In its nature, it is broad and
comprehensive. It is a necessary and salutary power, since without
it, society would be at the mercy of individual interest and there
would exist neither public order or security. While this is true, it
is only a power. It is not a "RIGHT?"
82. The powers of government, under our system, are nowhere absolute.
They are but grants of authority from the people, and are limited to
their true purposes. The fundamental "RIGHTS" of the people are
inherent and have not yielded to governmental control. They are not
the subjects of governmental authority. They are subjects of
individual authority. Constitutional powers can never transcend
constitutional "RIGHTS." The police power is subject to the
limitations imposed by the Constitution upon every power of
government; and it will not be suffered to invade or impair the
fundamental liberties of the Sovereign, those natural "RIGHTS" that
are the chief concern of the Constitution and for whose protection it
was ordained by the people.
82.1 To secure their property was one of the great ends for which men
entered into society. The "RIGHT" to acquire and own property, and to
deal with it and use it as the owner chooses, so long as the use
harms nobody, is a natural "RIGHT." It does not owe its origin to
constitutions. It existed before them. It is a part of the Citizen's
natural liberty -- an _expression of his freedom, guaranteed as
inviolate by every American Bill of "RIGHTS."
82.2 It is not a "RIGHT," therefore, over which the police power is
paramount. Like every other fundamental liberty, it is a "RIGHT" to
which the police power is subordinate.
82.3 It is a "RIGHT" which takes into account the equal "RIGHTS" of
others, for it is qualified by the obligation that the use of the
property shall not be to the prejudice of others. But if subject
alone to that qualification, the Citizen is not free to use his lands
and his goods as he chooses, it is difficult to perceive wherein
his "RIGHT" of property has any existence. (Emphasis added). See:
Spann, supra..
83. Where inherent, unalienable, absolute "RIGHTS" are concerned, the
police powers can have no effect. The "RIGHT" to travel on the
streets or highways and the "RIGHT" to own and use property have been
described as inherent, unalienable, and absolute. Thus the police
power cannot regulate this Sovereign's "RIGHT" to use a vehicle on
the streets or highways in North Carolina.
84. If the police power of the State is permitted to regulate the
travels of this Sovereign on the streets or highways in North
Carolina, and if, through the action of these regulations or
Statutes, this Sovereign is denied access to the streets or highways
in North Carolina; a fundamental "RIGHT" of this Sovereign has been
abrogated.
84.1 Where "RIGHTS" secured by the Constitution are involved, there
can be no rule making or legislation that would abrogate them.
(Emphasis added). See: Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491 (1966)
85. The abrogation of unalienable "RIGHTS" by legislation or rule
making is unconstitutional.
86. If further proof is needed to show that this Sovereign need not
be licensed to travel on the streets or highways in North Carolina,
it is provided in the following decisions:
86.1 A license fee is a tax. See: Parish of Morehouse v. Brigham, 6
So. 257
86.2 A state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a "RIGHT"
granted by the Federal Constitution. (Emphasis added). See: Murdock
v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105
87. Since a fee is charged for a driver's license and since one's
travels on the streets or highways in North Carolina is a "RIGHT"
guaranteed by the Federal Constitution, and by the LAW OF NATURE, it
is not constitutional for the State to require this Sovereign to be
licensed to travel.
88. Even the application for North Carolina Driver's License Form
recognizes the "RIGHT" of some persons to travel without a license.
North Carolina General Statutes recognizes categories of persons who
are not required to be licensed in this State. Why is it then that
the first demand made by the law enforcement personnel when making a
traffic stop is:
"Let's see your driver's license, registration, and proof of
insurance,"
and not always politely, when the first question should be;
"What is your status and are you required to have a driver's
license?"
89. Can it be that there is a conspiracy afoot within the State to
reduce all Sovereigns to a status of contract? Why else would a law
enforcement person take a Sovereign to jail without even trying to
discover if that Sovereign is exempt from the requirement of having a
driver's license?
90. The question now becomes whether this Sovereign is required to
obey any of the Statutes in the North Carolina General Statutes? It
has been shown that this Sovereign has a "RIGHT" to travel on the
streets or highways in North Carolina. So, any Statute that describes
driving on the streets or highways as a privilege cannot apply to
this Sovereign. Since the "RIGHT" of this Sovereign to travel cannot
be abrogated, any Statute the operation of which would have the
effect of denying access to the streets or highways to this Sovereign
cannot be applied to this Sovereign.
91. Since violation of any Statue in the North Carolina General
Statutes is classified as a "misdemeanor" that is punishable by a
fine and six months in jail, and since putting this Sovereign in jail
because of his use of the streets or highways that harms nobody would
be an abrogation of his "RIGHT" to travel, none of the Statutes of
the North Carolina General Statutes apply to this Sovereign. These
contentions are supported by the Supreme Court of United States.
91.1 An Iowa statute that requires that every foreign corporation
named in it shall as a condition for obtaining a permit to transact
business in Iowa, stipulate that it will not remove into the federal
court certain suits that it would by the laws of the United States
have a "RIGHT" to remove, is void because it makes the "RIGHT" to a
permit dependent upon the surrender by the foreign corporation of a
privilege secured to it by the Constitution and laws of the United
States. (Emphasis added). See: Bouvier's Law Dictionary quoting
Barron v. Burnside, 121 U.S. 186
92. This decision is consistent with that in Miranda, supra, in which
it was stated that where "RIGHTS" are concerned, there can be no rule
making or legislation that would abrogate them. It is also consistent
with the discussion in the following case. This case is a tax case,
but the discussion on "RIGHTS" that it contains is appropriate.
93. Individual and a Corporation
93.1 There is a clear distinction in this particular between an
individual and a corporation, and that the latter has no "RIGHT" to
refuse to submit its books and papers for an examination at the suit
of the State. The individual may stand upon his
constitutional "RIGHTS" as a Citizen. He is entitled to carry on his
private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited.
He owes no duty to the State or to his neighbors to divulge his
business, or to open his doors to an investigation so far as it may
tend to criminate him. He owes no such duty to the State, since he
receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and
property. His "RIGHTS" are such as existed by the law of the land
long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be
taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the
Constitution. Among his "RIGHTS" are a refusal to incriminate
himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or
seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the
public so long as he does not trespass upon their "RIGHTS." (Emphasis
added.) See: Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43
94. The Emphasized statement is also consistent with North Carolina
Statute. In the Statute reads:
94.1 Common law in force. The common law of England, as far as it is
not repugnant to or inconsistent with the Constitution or laws of the
United States in all cases not provided for in these compiled laws,
is the rule of decision in all courts in this state.
95. Since the Statutes of the North Carolina General Statutes cannot
apply to this Sovereign, he becomes subject to the Common Law that
maintains that he owes nothing to the public while he does not
trespass upon their "RIGHTS."
96. Is it the contention of this Sovereign that because the Statutes
contained in the North Carolina General Statutes do not apply to him
that the Statutes are unconstitutional? Absolutely not. There is a
class of persons in North Carolina to whom these Statutes apply
without reservation. Members of this class include corporations and
those who do the corporation business on the streets or highways in
North Carolina. A corporation is the creation of the State.
96.1 A corporation is a creature of the State. It is presumed to be
incorporated for the benefit of the public. It receives certain
special privileges and franchises and holds them, subject to the laws
of the State and the limitations of its charter. Its "RIGHTS" to act
as a corporation are only preserved to it while it obeys the laws of
its creation. (Emphasis added). See: Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1914
p. 684
97. It is a person in the eyes of the law but it lacks character, no
morals, no conscience. It's every activity must be directed and
supervised by the State. Under the definition of "Due Process of
Law", Bouvier's Law Dictionary states in part:
97.1 The liberty guaranteed is that of a natural person and not of
artificial persons; Western Turf Assn. v. Greenberg, 204 U.S. 359
where it was said "a corporation cannot be deemed a Citizen within
the meaning of the clause of the Constitution of the United States
which protects the privileges and immunities of Citizens of the
United States against being abridged or impaired by the law of a
state." (See also 203 U.S. 243)
98. The Statutes in the North Carolina General Statutes are designed
to direct the activities of the class of persons of which a
corporation is a member. Corporations are absolutely bound by these
Statutes. It is imperative that a conscienceless entity not be
allowed to roam the streets or highways in North Carolina and
jeopardize the Sovereigns. It is for this purpose that the Statutes
of the North Carolina General Statutes were enacted and not for the
control of a Free and Natural Sovereign.
Conclusion
99. There is no Court in this Land that could lawfully execute an
Order that would or could cause, or work to compel, One to become a
servant or slave of any city, county or state without a conviction
and with full Due Process of Law, and for any city, county, or state
to pretend otherwise is an absurdity.