Feeds: Email, RSS & Twitter

Get Our Videos By Email


8,300 Unique Visitors In The Past Day


Powered by Squarespace


Search The Archive Of 15,000 Videos




Hank Paulson Is A Criminal - Pass It On

"The Federal Reserve Is A Ponzi Scheme"

Get Our Videos By Email


Bernanke's Replacement: Happy Hour In Santa Cruz

Must See: National Debt Road Trip

"Of Course We're Not Going To  Payback the Chinese."

Dave Chappelle On White Collar Crime

Carlin: Wall Street Owns Washington

SLIDESHOW - Genius Signs From Irish IMF Protest

SLIDESHOW - Airport Security Cartoons - TSA

Most Recent Comments
Cartoons & Photos
« Donald Trump And Nigel Farage | This Is Really Bizarre | Main | New Device Helps Crooked Climb The Stairs... »

Debate Commissioner Declares: 'Mark Cuban Will Not Be Sitting In The Front Row'


Debate commission chair Frank Fahrenkopf tells Smerconish on CNN they will not allow 'people like Mark Cuban to sit in front row to distract the candidates.' The interview is from Saturday morning, before Gennifer Flowers accepted Trump's offer to attend with a tweet marked with a giant red lipstick kiss.

Twitter erupted as Buzzfeed confirmed the story. CNN and other networks were then forced to explain Gennifer Flowers to their millennial audience. So Trump won round one, but it would be a colossal mistake for the campaign to follow through and put Flowers front and center. Yeah, it has fired up the rabid base and it would make fascinating television, but it could also threaten recent momentum with women, as the media spins Clinton into a sympathetic victim. That's what they do. That's how this works, and Kelly Conway must understand that.

Trump trolls Clinton...

Gennifer accepts...


PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (122)

Hah! Michael Moore sums up Trump perfectly:

Oct 26, 2016 at 12:55 PM | Unregistered Commenterpitchfork
Doubtful Pitch, he is one man who will have the GOP and Demoncrats in Congress and the Senate both aligned against him seeking sabotage. This will most likely look more like the man made oil shortage under Carter only on a grander scale since both parties will be out to make him look bad. Unlike his tv show, "your fired!" is not going to do the job against the elected good ole boy club.
Oct 26, 2016 at 9:57 PM | Unregistered CommenterS. Gompers
Most here already know Rothschild MEANS Red Shield,
banker to the Pope--there's nothing anti Cath anti J
about it--it's just an historic event.

The Wahabbi's are Rothschilds.

This is why Netanyahy lives in Caesaria and Riyadh
is the most rigid nation insisting on division male centrism
and, frankly, killing naturally occurring gays.

These things reversed the events that were the basis
of Lincoln (and John Kennedy) and even improvised on
ancient naivety by creating the role of Coulter instead of
simply someone seeking equality (opinion as to her--I better
do that for all I know her lawyers can pierce this.)

There's simply no not including all these elements.

The fraud runs from one Napoleon, through Hitler, to
one or other identifier presently--it could be Trump, what
appears Coulter's hero.

However, the Democrats have an opportunity to remake JFK
Oct 28, 2016 at 8:47 PM | Unregistered CommenterAnthonyWieniewienie
Hey Skin, been pondering your Asian Friend, HO LEE FUK! Can this woman who has spent her entire life preparing to run for President, be taken down by a man who spent his entire life building an empire? Maybe, Maybe not. At the end of the day, it is all ABOUT A WEINER
Oct 29, 2016 at 8:33 AM | Unregistered CommenterBackgammonn
Hey Skin, been pondering your Asian Friend, HO LEE FUK! Can this woman who has spent her entire life preparing to run for President, be taken down by a man who spent his entire life building an empire? Maybe, Maybe not. At the end of the day, it is all ABOUT A WEINER
Oct 29, 2016 at 8:34 AM | Unregistered CommenterBackgammonn
What I do contemplate is why a Muslim woman would marry a Jewish man. Maybe she saw something that she liked. And what about their child? Anyway, when Weiner went about NY looking for votes, he encountered some Jewish people who were not at all happy that he married outside the religion. One may get away with that elsewhere, but I would not think that would be the case in New York. I think I saw that vid within that documentary they did on him when he went running again. He must have pissed someone off to have this subject constantly dog him like this. To think that the problems with wimmen haunting the Great Trumpkin would come back to haunt Count Skankula is pretty hillaryious.
Oct 29, 2016 at 9:23 AM | Unregistered Commenterskinflint
The reopened FBI investigation is BY FAR the biggest story of the year. That's not blood you're smelling in the water, it's a freshly-stuffed crematorium. 650 THOUSAND emails? Ummmmm, that number sounds like Huma the Nitwit unwittingly sync'd up her Outlook from Hillary's private email server with the Pervert's computer. If that's right, the FBI is sitting on the fucking el Dorado.

There is NO WAY Comey reverses himself publicly like that in view of the standing FBI guideline (not "rule;" the guideline says "should," not "shall") against disclosures within T-minus-60 days of an election UNLESS the new info spelled automatic DQ for Hillary as Prez.

Stay tuned, sports fans, 'cuz this one's gonna get UGLY.

And go CUBBIES!!!
Oct 31, 2016 at 9:35 AM | Unregistered CommenterCheyenne
The size of the email cache implies
HA/AW were moles.

HA's Saudi.

Rothschild means Red Shield, banker to the Pope
and the court of the Holy Roman Empire, seated
in Prague. Dollar comes from taler, the Holy Roman

The Wahabbi's are Rothschilds.

Their purpose is intensifying nativistic tribalism
and division. Naive gay as capital status crime
total makes all males submissive lest they do
what's equated with not gay: whatever suits
the leaders and people determined to scapegoat
them gay or not.
Oct 31, 2016 at 11:57 PM | Unregistered CommenterMole Ina Hole
Grand slam and Arrietta works out of a bases loaded jam. Nice piece of work. Go Cubs.
Nov 2, 2016 at 4:56 AM | Unregistered Commenterskinflint
Cheyenne, DB and the rest of you Cubbie fans. Congrats. It's amazing what winning the series can do. After 108 years the sun has risen.
Nov 3, 2016 at 4:48 AM | Unregistered Commenterskinflint
Thanks, skin. That was one of the craziest baseball games I've ever seen. Watching it with over a century's worth of ghosts over your shoulder was an experience like no other. When the Tribe tied it up in the 8th with the help of 2-run wild pitch, which damn near cold-cocked the catcher, I thought I was gonna be sick.

But kudos are really in order not only to the team itself, which is more resilient than any Cub squad I'd seen before, but to Joe Maddon and Theo Epstein, who proved so many hardened skeptics (including this one) wrong.

Nov 3, 2016 at 8:09 AM | Unregistered CommenterCheyenne
Amazing game. Even my wife, who's been a baseball fan for all of like 6 days, stayed up to watch the whole thing.

BTW, maybe I'm just a little slow, but why aren't any of the Podesta emails from HRC herself? Hmm.... Is Comey trying to do CYA, knowing what's likely to happen? You'd be hard pressed to find a harder cynic than me, but I can't for the life of me figure out who benefits from the latest developments.
Nov 3, 2016 at 9:11 AM | Unregistered Commenterpitchfork
Like I said, I'm a little bit slow. I just searched and found 15 from hrod. (Only 15???)
Nov 3, 2016 at 10:26 AM | Unregistered Commenterpitchfork
Interesting... In response to one hrod email on Syria, Podesta replies:

"Yes and interesting but not for this channel."

Maybe not as dumb as we thought. Or was Podesta concerned about classified intel going over (what he knew to be) unsecured email?
Nov 3, 2016 at 10:29 AM | Unregistered Commenterpitchfork
Pitch, I would speculate that HRC has her flying monkeys send the emails instead. She is damn well aware (due to her vast experience) of the problems that could occur if she did it herself.
Nov 4, 2016 at 7:12 AM | Unregistered Commenterjohn
I think john's right, Dr. P. I noticed the same dearth of HRC emails last night slogging through yesterday's Wikidumps. Also, I have to wonder if Podesta is acquainted with the DELETE key given the large amount of spam in his email. Sheesh.
Nov 4, 2016 at 8:37 AM | Unregistered CommenterCheyenne
Are you guys aware of the noise coming out about how the NYPD found the emails and how they were pressured by the DOJ not to disclose them or make any moves? The only named source I could find was Erik Prince (blackwater), but other places have mentioned an anon, "well-placed" source in the NYPD for this. The DOJ threat was to indict another NYPD officer in the Eric Garner case. What a crazy fucking election.

Nov 4, 2016 at 12:02 PM | Unregistered Commenterpitchfork
What's going on is just unbelievable. If stories like the following are true, there's a civil war going on between the DOJ and the FBI right now (even though technically the FBI is part of the DOJ, the FBI directorship is a 10-year appointment, whereas the AG is a regular political appointment; so there's some separation)...

“We’re preparing for many arrests from the top down,” the FBI source said.



DiGenova, who has bureau sources close to the FBI investigation, named Attorney General Loretta Lynch, Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, Assistant Attorney General Peter Kaznick, Assistant Attorney General John P. Carlin, and Assistant Attorney General Leslie Caldwell as senior level staff at DOJ have who have “done something that they are going to regret.”


Of course, regardless of what happens, only the DOJ can prosecute FEDERAL crimes. (Crimes like murder and rape are state law, different story.) So in the end, you’re left relying on Congress to demand the appointment of a special prosecutor.

Place your bets...
Nov 4, 2016 at 1:22 PM | Unregistered CommenterCheyenne
The real obstacle in all of this is the media. I'd bet dollars to donuts that someone in the Executive branch (WH, DOJ, etc.) has let it be known that mainstream reporters are not to be reporting on the Wikileaks releases. (WTF was Chris Cuomo talking about the other day, that it was illegal for people to look at "stolen" emails?!) And seeing as NSA, to say nothing of Google, has all of their comms anyway, as well as porn habits, it would be easy enough to put pressure on most reporters. The reason I say that is the near total lack of reporting on the Wikileaks revelations. It's SO obvious.

A lot of my conservative/Catholic friends are talking about "prudence" and the stability of institutions and whatnot, but I say bring on the Constitutional crisis. I mean, it's not like we're not in the middle of one anyway -- it's just that it's crept up on us like a slow cancer. It's only now that we're in the train-wreck phase (to mix metaphors).

If this story were about Trump, every MSM outfit in the world would be questioning NYPD right now.
Nov 4, 2016 at 3:38 PM | Unregistered Commenterpitchfork
Thanks Pitch for the Erik Prince info. Hillz has been really hot about the King of Morocco. I wrote about that here a couple of years ago in the 'John Kerry comes out swinging about climate change' article I did. The emails ( i go through each one too and my eyes and fingers can't keep up!). Gotta check out the last 2 dumps and will check back in. It's drugs, arms and renewables. I swear on my soul. Same folks....
Nov 4, 2016 at 6:12 PM | Unregistered Commenterjohn
Pitch, With all due respect, this crisis has been pedal to the metal for eight years running. The rampant fraud that has not been prosecuted and all the other crimes that have that co morbidity. The flagrant pay for play for credit ratings agencies to triple A those tranches and on and on. I'm surprised the shit hasn't rolled out as of yet. They must be putting something in the food or water.
Nov 4, 2016 at 6:15 PM | Unregistered Commenterskinflint
The "stability of institutions" is an interesting phrase. If it means the rule of law, sovereignty (national and personal alike), and the constitution, then yeah, I'm all about it. But it can't mean that, because all three (or four) of those things have been seriously eroded over the last 8 years. (If I didn't know any better, I'd think it was by design; it's a good thing I watch TV whenever I'm not siphoning MSM brain fuel into my cranial cavity and thus know better.)

No, what we need isn't stability right now--that's actually the LAST thing we want. Instead we need the restoration of order. At this point, arguing for "stability" is consenting to (1) an entrenched system of cronyism, (2) a two-tiered system of justice run by cronies, (3) the license for cronies to commit crimes, however severe, with total impunity, (4) too-big-to-fail banks, (5) too-big-to-jail bankers, (6) derivatives books that DWARF global GDP despite the total lack of transparency into those bets, (7) "news" organizations that deliver nothing but propaganda so detached from reality that Orwell would roll over in his grave, (8) endless undeclared wars in which the U.S. murders millions of people abroad, (9) no real accounting standards and thus no way to measure how much trouble we or anyone else is in, (10) religion masquerading as "science" so that dissenters can be dismissed and/or punished, (11) a Federal Reserve system under private control, with ZERO real transparency, that's grown increasingly powerful over the last 8 years (having expanded the U.S. money supply from $0.9 trillion to $4.5 trillion in part by taking on worthless assets onto its books so that TBTF/TBTJ crimes are concealed), (12) an increasingly powerful--and lawless--executive branch that has vastly exceeded any abuses meted out by King George III, (13) a president who sees no problem in maintaining lists of people he can kill for no reason at all, (14) secret courts that do not fall under article 3 of the constitution, i.e., star chambers, (15) a labor force participation rate that's been in decline since 2000 and in very serious decline since the bailouts (and which has almost nothing to do with demographics, as Australia's matching demographic and opposite LFPR shows beyond all doubt), (16) "free trade" agreements that rob people of their livelihoods so that a handful of rich slobs get even fatter, (17) a pending free trade agreement--"negotiated" in secret (i.e., dictated by corporations)--that will further eviscerate U.S. sovereignty, (18) VERY shitty movies...

That list is top-of-the-head. Anyone who wishes to see those institutions preserved under the hopelessly vague and naive banner of "stability" simply hasn't been paying attention.

ALL of the foregoing problems (except #18, and even that's arguable) can be eradicated under the existing laws, which come from the constitution.
Nov 4, 2016 at 11:20 PM | Unregistered CommenterCheyenne
In every Hillary ad I've seen, she sounds like yippie poodle sniping at Trump's heels. Think about that. She has unlimited money, and yet her ads are relentlessly bad. In large part that's because she has no vision beyond her own eyelids and can't speak worth a shit to boot, which is why no one comes to her minuscule and deflationary "rallies."

This new ad by Trump just CRUSHES her in too many ways to count...

Nov 5, 2016 at 12:45 AM | Unregistered CommenterCheyenne

I think we're on the same page here. The cancer, in my view, started 50 years ago. The train wreck began c. 2008.

BTW, your comment reminds me of the greatest "with all due respect" moment of all time:

Nov 5, 2016 at 8:13 AM | Unregistered Commenterpitchfork

That's exactly what I meant by the cancer. And it's more than a Constitutional crisis -- as you've been saying over the past few years, it's about the total breakdown of the rule of law (order, if you will). But Trump has a potty mouth, so he's Loki.
Nov 5, 2016 at 8:20 AM | Unregistered Commenterpitchfork
That was refreshing. I would like to see more of that in the Congress.
Nov 5, 2016 at 8:30 AM | Unregistered Commenterskinflint
john, I gotta admit, I've stopped slogging through the wikidumps page by page. Ugh. I've started using the search engine, just for simple word searches now.

I wish there was a way to sort the searches (by date for example), but I'll be damned if I can find it.

In view of the zero hedge story about Froman/Citigroup pegging most of Obama's cabinet ahead of the election, I searched "froman" for one batch and was surprised by the (big) number of hits. Right now I'm working on a big video (a documentary, really) about HSBC and don't wanna get too distracted by this stuff.

If Hillary gets elected, though, you damn well know what I'll be looking at for my next video subject (I-M-P-E-A-C-H-M-E-N-T)** and that I'll be wiki-dumpster-diving like a fool. So if you come up with any search tips, lemme know...

** I've done ZERO research on this, but I'm pretty sure that a presidential pardon for crimes doesn't take impeachment off the table. Likewise state crimes stay on the table, and what most people think of as crimes (murder, rape, etc.) are state law, whereas pardons are federal.
Nov 5, 2016 at 9:23 AM | Unregistered CommenterCheyenne

There's a dropdown box where you can select sort by (Wikileaks) release date or by email send date. Also, you can select a range of dates in the advanced search.
Nov 5, 2016 at 10:20 AM | Unregistered Commenterpitchfork
Nov 5, 2016 at 10:24 AM | Unregistered Commenterpitchfork
Robert Gates Leaks.


John, Well, we didn't quite get to Friday before the "official" leaks. Unless I get different guidance from you, I still plan no comments and no confirmations of anything, including a meeting. I have re-done my schedule for Monday at Minot Air Force Base to accommodate a 9:30 a.m. announcement in Chicago. (I will be flying in from the west coast Sunday night.) Because this has inconvenienced a lot of Air Force folks, I hope that plan stays in place. I thought a good meeting yesterday. Hope you all thought so as well. Bob

Note: Bob Gates was Director of Central Intelligence (1991–1993)
Nov 5, 2016 at 11:55 AM | Unregistered Commenterjohn
Pitch, that dropbox is quite handy.

All of Bob Gates e-mails to date:

Nov 5, 2016 at 11:57 AM | Unregistered Commenterjohn
I will agree with the following. How many congressional or other investigations have you ever seen result in indictments since William K Black?

D.C. Attorney Joe DiGenova: Don’t Expect Any Indictments From Clinton Investigations


“There isn’t going to be an indictment because Loretta Lynch, [Sally] Yates and Leslie Caldwell will not permit it. That’s why we are going to have the greatest political crisis in history after this election no matter who wins. It will be worse if she wins, but these people at the Justice Department have been politically corrupt in the department,” DiGenova told The Daily Caller late last week.

DiGenova explained, “There isn’t going to be an indictment no matter what Comey says and no matter what the FBI agents say. [The Justice Department] will not permit it. We now have the most politically corrupt Justice Department in the last 100 years.”


Justice search for Hillary comes up empty.

Nov 5, 2016 at 3:02 PM | Unregistered Commenterjohn
Pinata party anyone?

Nov 5, 2016 at 6:54 PM | Unregistered Commenterjohn
The DOW has now jumped 351 points, it would appear the 0.001% got their fix for the presidential election in play and guaranteed. As the Pope doesn't like Trump I doubt even God wouldn't keep Hillary out of the Oval Office now.
Get ready for the upgraded Hill and Bill American pay to play politics yard sale. Wonder how long it will take them to end up with a trillion dollar bankroll, Before or after she's out of office? They made plenty after Bill, and they've learned a lot since then.
Nov 7, 2016 at 2:19 PM | Unregistered CommenterSagebrush
Great horror film idea, Sage, let's make it a reality TV show. Oh, wait...

On the other hand, when I eyeballed this story about Hillary canceling her election night fireworks show, I braced myself when I sorted the comments by Best (one of my favorite features on the whole internet) since the story is posted on TMZ. Holy shit! I can't believe my own eyes. I mean, if you've just lined up a cast of all-star celebrities to go to bat for you for an entire year--as Hillary has done--and yet you still get this kind of referendum on TM fucking Z, for Christ's sake, you are an EPIC PIECE OF DOG SHIT:

Nov 7, 2016 at 2:50 PM | Unregistered CommenterCheyenne
I do believe there are more emails in the works to be forthcoming.

Cryptome ‏@Cryptomeorg 11h11 hours ago
What's up Podesta email dribble? Stalled at 52,992, reportedly >60,000 stashed.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails//get/52993 … + produces "Internal Server Error."
0 replies 3 retweets 12 likes
Nov 7, 2016 at 5:28 PM | Unregistered Commenterjohn
The DNC (and Hillary) are gonna kick their own ass for throwing Scott Foval under the bus! Check out his twitter feed!!!

Nov 7, 2016 at 9:32 PM | Unregistered Commenterjohn
Just returned from voting, and am kinda disappointed, no clown cars anywhere... The events of the last couple of weeks amaze even me (which is pretty hard to do).
Nov 8, 2016 at 10:41 AM | Unregistered CommenterS. Gompers
mrbeercrusher ‏@mrbeercrusher 52m52 minutes ago

#ElectionDay exit polls show Trump winning Maine's 2nd Congressional District by at least 8% to 10%. Voter enthusiasm up!
Nov 8, 2016 at 5:22 PM | Unregistered Commenterjohn
The deranged bereavement on the faces of Her Criminalness's supporters right now is impossible to watch without laughing out loud. The media's anchors and experts look like bratty kids discovering that Santa left them a bag of dogshit next to a handwritten FUCK-YOU card.
Nov 9, 2016 at 1:31 AM | Unregistered CommenterCheyenne
Cheyenne, You know what's great about the internet. You can watch the hilarity over and over again. You can stop the video at that exact moment when they realize that their game has ended. I, for one, will walk around with a lighter step, a song in my heart and though it is raining here, the sun will shine if but for a brief moment.
Nov 9, 2016 at 5:08 AM | Unregistered Commenterskinflint
Indeed Cheyenne! LOL!
Nov 9, 2016 at 5:52 AM | Unregistered Commenterjohn
Dear Canada, I am sorry to inform you that quite a few undesirable folks from the US will be trying to sneak across the border to your country. When they arrive, be advised that we won’t be taking them back!
Nov 9, 2016 at 6:50 AM | Unregistered Commenterjohn
Indeed cheyenne! a song in my heart,, a skip in my step. I had given up on the American people to make a rational decision. To those who voted Trump, I thank you, to those who voted for the Criminal, Screw You. If Trump does 1/4 of his promises, I am happy. Law and Order will hopefully be restored "a little". Can't wait to see the Morning liberal heads spin 180.
Nov 9, 2016 at 7:47 AM | Unregistered CommenterBackgammon
That has absolutely gotta be the most incredible "underdog" victory I have ever seen. Now for the real battle since the Dems and half the Reps in Con-gress will be against him. I think my Governor might have been having chest pains last night.
Nov 9, 2016 at 10:01 AM | Unregistered CommenterS. Gompers

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.