Quantcast
Feeds: Email, RSS & Twitter

Get Our Videos By Email

 

8,300 Unique Visitors In The Past Day

 

Powered by Squarespace

 

Most Recent Comments
Cartoons & Photos
SEARCH
« Geithner's Revenge - Elizabeth Warren Might NOT Lead New Consumer Financial Agency: Report | Main | Hypocrisy Watch: House GOP Leadership Suddenly Changes Tune On Fannie, Freddie Overhaul »
Thursday
Dec302010

Ron Paul Does Not Like Elizabeth Warren Or The New Consumer Protection Agency (VIDEO)

Video:  Ron Paul Texas Straight Talk - The banks still win in Washington

This is a difficult issue, and I understand why Congressman Paul and others from the Austrian School do not support the CFPB.  He has no confidence the agency won't eventually be captured by the industry it regulates - the banks.

--

Congressman Ron Paul

The Banks Still Win In Washington

This past week the administration announced its choice for the first credit czar at the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. This bureau was created as part of the supposed Wall Street reform bill recently passed by Congress. This new bureau, which represents nothing more than another layer of useless Washington bureaucracy, will be housed within the Federal Reserve -- one of the most anti-consumer institutions in Washington.

The appointee named to run the bureau is an Ivy League professor. By her own admission she is an academic, not a business person. She has very little real world business experience with the highly complex financial instruments she will oversee. The administration has done nothing to refute her characterization by some in the financial press as an anti-business, ivory tower leftist with an aversion to free market principles.

She also admits to being told, or warned, that the big banks always win in Washington - yet she trumpeted the creation of this new agency as a win against those banks. I would caution her against declaring victory too soon.

Outrageously, she has been appointed as a "special advisor" to design and lead the bureau, but the administration has not disclosed the exact length of her term. There will be no Senate confirmation hearings, nor will the public or the financial industry be allowed to comment on her appointment. We simply are expected to accept the appointment of an enormously powerful regulator without question, and without regard to the constitutional requirement that the Senate advise and consent with regard to her appointment. This means you, as a voter and citizen, effectively have no say whatsoever for the duration of her appointment. In the meantime, she has unprecedented new powers over private business decisions.

The truth is that this new bureau is just more of the same ineffective and damaging regulation we typically get from a crisis. Just as the FDA serves big pharmaceutical companies, not patients, and just as the SEC serves Wall Street, not investors, this agency will end up serving the banks. All regulatory agencies eventually become co-opted by the industries they regulate, and they become chiefly concerned with restricting the entry of new competitors and protecting market share for the big players. This new bureau is not likely to straighten out Wall Street, so much as it will instill a false sense of security in the public about banking and investing again.

No bureaucrat, no federal agency, and no ivory tower academic can replace the regulatory powers of the free market. "Caveat emptor" remains the rule for intelligent investors and depositors. Buyers always need to beware, especially when politicians say they have it all under control.

Real reform starts with transparency and an adherence to the rule of law. The administration would do well to adhere to the law, rather than shoving a new economic czar down our throats without congressional involvement. Real reform would mean taking steps toward restoring sound money and getting back to the Constitution. The Constitution does not allow for favors to special interests, or handing out public money to keep private businesses afloat. The Constitution necessitates a small, impartial government that first and foremost, protects liberty, and sees all citizens as equal. It does not recognize a special banking class.  The fact that measures to achieve these ends are still quashed tells me that indeed, the banks do still win in Washington.

##

 

 

I don't put Paul in this class, as he's obviously no fan of the banking lobby:

---

Must See:

 

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (11)

Sign Waving Across The USA For RON PAUL On Nov. 5th!!!

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=103347796396805
Sep 21, 2010 at 9:49 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Warren Steps Down from Congressional Oversight Panel

http://cop.senate.gov/press/releases/release-091710-warren.cfm
Sep 21, 2010 at 9:51 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Elizabeth Warren issues warning to American people

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iu3it3uLVRs&feature=related

Start watching at 1:40...runs 45 seconds from there...ratigan with henry blodgett...
Sep 21, 2010 at 9:54 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
It's the Spending, Stupid

A chronic voter 'concern' has now exploded into a broad public movement.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703743504575493953591176476.html?mod=loomia&loomia_si=t0:a16:g4:r3:c0:b0
Sep 21, 2010 at 9:57 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Once again I find myself admiring Ron Paul's position.

Elizabeth Warren didn't have the guts to stand up against Bernanke. She appeared on Jon Stewart the night before Bernanke's reconfirmation and chose to stump for this agency and say, "God bless Barney Frank!"

Yeah, after that, I think it would be a real bad idea to give her a free pass.
Dec 30, 2010 at 7:31 PM | Unregistered Commentermark mchugh
There's a huge difference between free markets and the freedom to lie, cheat, and steal which is virtually what the financial sector has done. With so many loopholes and creative legalese, laws are undermined. Protections are typically put in place for those who are most vulnerable to being taken advantage of, yet the free marketeers want the freedom to rip off anyone that they can get away with doing so. Great democracy that we've got here. America is a joke.
Jan 1, 2011 at 10:40 AM | Unregistered CommenterAnonymous
@ Anonymous,
I don't think the term Democracy or Democratic Republic have described the USA for a long time.

I believe America is a de facto corporatocracy. Because government and main street media tend to camouflage the degree to which corporate interests control Congress and the Presidential Addminstration, it's hard to prove it. However many Western governments based on a capitalist system including the USA have been accused of being corporatocracies. Most large corporations contribute generously to political candidates and their causes. The politicians depend on these corporate donations to win elections and keep their power and wealth. To maintain this support the politician essentially becomes an employee of the corporation and not a representative of the people.
The reaction from Congress and two Presidential Administrations during the economic collapse, forcing the American middle class to sacrifice their lifestyle and their future to bailout a criminal and absolutely corrupt financial industry and corporations like General Motors, and others that should have gone bankrupt. Proves my point.
Instead of being fired for incompetence, or fines and prison for the criminals, the people responsible for fraud and the biggest rip-off larceny in American history are making billions courtesy of government and the Federal Reserve while 30 million average americans are out of work and living on unemployment or food stamps.
How does it feel to live in a fascist country?
Jan 1, 2011 at 6:14 PM | Unregistered CommenterSagebrush
How does it feel? Well, for one, the ss bloggers are on power trips.
Jan 1, 2011 at 7:04 PM | Unregistered CommenterLang Syne
Dear Dr. Paul,

Please support Elizabeth Warren. Look at her work before the financial crisis. You'll find her work (e.g., "The Coming Collapse of the Middle Class") sounds nothing like anything you hear from banker/FED economists. You need ALLIES in DC, Dr. Paul, since you're hopelessly outgunned by tax-and-spend Democrats and borrow-and-spend Republicans -- who are all PRO-FED/PRO-BANKER/ANTI-MIDDLE-CLASS. Learn to find HIGHLY MORAL, EDUCATED, ARTICULATE ALLIES where you can, Dr. Paul.

Thank you.
Jan 1, 2011 at 9:48 PM | Unregistered Commenterwunsacon
"No bureaucrat, no federal agency, and no ivory tower academic can replace the regulatory powers of the free market."

Yeah! The old FM did an absolutely great job with the crisis!

How can a sentient being say what RP said? So bizarre it's...bizarre.

RP needs exposure to something - anything - besides mises.org.
Jan 3, 2011 at 1:50 AM | Unregistered Commenterbilln

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.